اشترك بالحزمة الذهبية واحصل على وصول غير محدود شمرا أكاديميا
تسجيل مستخدم جديدUsing Computational Essays to Redistribute Epistemic Agency in Undergraduate Science
75
0
0.0
(
0
)
اسأل ChatGPT حول البحث
ﻻ يوجد ملخص باللغة العربية
This article reports on a study investigating how computational essays can be used to redistribute epistemic agency--cognitive control and responsibility over ones own learning--to students in higher education STEM. Computational essays are a genre of scientific writing that combine live, executable computer code with narrative text to present a computational model or analysis. The study took place across two contrasting university contexts: an interdisciplinary data science and modeling course at Michigan State University, USA, and a third-semester physics course at the University of Oslo, Norway. Over the course of a semester, computational essays were simultaneously and independently used in both courses, and comparable datasets of student artifacts and retrospective interviews were collected from both student populations. These data were analyzed using a framework which operationalized the construct of epistemic agency across the dimensions of programming, inquiry, data analysis and modeling, and communication. Based on this analysis, we argue that computational essays can be a useful tool in redistributing epistemic agency to students within higher education science due to their combination of adaptability and disciplinary authenticity. However, we also argue that educational contexts, scaffolding, expectations, and student backgrounds can constrain and influence the ways in which students choose to take up epistemic agency.
قيم البحث
اقرأ أيضاً
Commercial video games are increasingly using sophisticated physics simulations to create a more immersive experience for players. This also makes them a powerful tool for engaging students in learning physics. We provide some examples to show how co
mmercial off-the-shelf games can be used to teach specific topics in introductory undergraduate physics. The examples are selected from a course taught predominantly through the medium of commercial video games.
Smartphones may be seen as miniature toolboxs to perform Physics experiments. In this paper, we present three different optics workbenches mainly based on the light meter of a smartphone. One is aimed at the precise study of Malus law and other effec
ts associated to linearly polarized light, the second allows quantifying the light intensity distribution of diffraction or interference patterns projected on a screen, and the third demonstrates the so-called inverse square law obeyed by the light from a pointlike source. These experiments allow to quantitatively demonstrate three fundamental laws of optics using quite inexpensive equipment.
Encouraging student engagement is a key aim in any educational setting. Allowing students the freedom to pursue their own methods of solving problems through independent experimentation has been shown to markedly improve this. In many contexts, howev
er, allowing students this flexibility in their learning is hampered by constraints of the material itself, such as in the electronics laboratory, where expensive equipment confines the learning environment to the laboratory room. To address this, we present the development of a low-cost, portable electronics learning platform, the WinterLab board and software interface, designed for use in an introductory science undergraduate electronics course. The platform is comparable or lower in cost than a typical textbook, fits in the palm of the hand, connects to the users computer via USB, and incorporates all equipment used in a typical undergraduate electronics laboratory. The WinterLab platform was given to a subset of students in the 2019 edition of an electronics and signal processing second year undergraduate course, who used it to complete the courses laboratory curriculum. Students reception of the board was positive, and several requested to keep the board beyond the end of the semester for use in personal projects. Equipping students with a low-cost test and measurement platform, such as the WinterLab board, that can be used at home and kept after the end of the course represents an accessible avenue for improving engagement in electronics learning at the science undergraduate level.
The rapidly growing quantum information science and engineering (QISE) industry will require both quantum-aware and quantum-proficient engineers at the bachelors level. We provide a roadmap for building a quantum engineering education program to sati
sfy this need. For quantum-aware engineers, we describe how to design a first quantum engineering course accessible to all STEM students. For the education and training of quantum-proficient engineers, we detail both a quantum engineering minor accessible to all STEM majors, and a quantum track directly integrated into individual engineering majors. We propose that such programs typically require only three or four newly developed courses that complement existing engineering and science classes available on most larger campuses. We describe a conceptual quantum information science course for implementation at any post-secondary institution, including community colleges and military schools. QISE presents extraordinary opportunities to work towards rectifying issues of inclusivity and equity that continue to be pervasive within engineering. We present a plan to do so and describe how quantum engineering education presents an excellent set of education research opportunities. Finally, we outline a hands-on training plan on quantum hardware, a key component of any quantum engineering program, with a variety of technologies including optics, atoms and ions, cryogenic and solid-state technologies, nanofabrication, and control and readout electronics. Our recommendations provide a flexible framework that can be tailored for academic institutions ranging from teaching and undergraduate-focused two- and four-year colleges to research-intensive universities.
Current trends suggest that significant gender disparities exist within Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) education at university, with female students being underrepresented in physics, but more equally represented in life sci
ences (e.g., biology, medicine). To understand these trends, it is important to consider the context in which students make decisions about which university courses to enrol in. The current study seeks to investigate gender differences in STEM through a unique approach that combines network analysis of student enrolment data with an interpretive lens based on the sociological theory of Pierre Bourdieu. We generate a network of courses taken by around 9000 undergraduate physics students (from 2009 to 2014) to quantify Bourdieus concept of field. We explore the properties of this network to investigate gender differences in transverse movements (between different academic fields) and vertical movements (changes in students achievement rankings within a field). Our findings indicate that female students are more likely to make transverse movements into life science fields. We also find that university physics does a poor job in attracting high achieving students, and especially high achieving female students. Of the students who do choose to study physics, low achieving female students are less likely to continue than their male counterparts. The results and implications are discussed in the context of Bourdieus theory, and previous research. We argue that in order to remove constraints on female students study choices, the field of physics needs to provide a culture in which all students feel like they belong.
سجل دخول لتتمكن من نشر تعليقات
التعليقات
جاري جلب التعليقات
سجل دخول لتتمكن من متابعة معايير البحث التي قمت باختيارها
