اشترك بالحزمة الذهبية واحصل على وصول غير محدود شمرا أكاديميا
تسجيل مستخدم جديدEmpowering Differential Networks Using Bayesian Analysis
109
0
0.0
(
0
)
اسأل ChatGPT حول البحث
ﻻ يوجد ملخص باللغة العربية
Differential networks (DN) are important tools for modeling the changes in conditional dependencies between multiple samples. A Bayesian approach for estimating DNs, from the classical viewpoint, is introduced with a computationally efficient threshold selection for graphical model determination. The algorithm separately estimates the precision matrices of the DN using the Bayesian adaptive graphical lasso procedure. Synthetic experiments illustrate that the Bayesian DN performs exceptionally well in numerical accuracy and graphical structure determination in comparison to state-of-the-art methods. The proposed method is applied to South African COVID-$19$ data to investigate the change in DN structure between various phases of the pandemic.
قيم البحث
اقرأ أيضاً
There has been increasing interest in modeling survival data using deep learning methods in medical research. In this paper, we proposed a Bayesian hierarchical deep neural networks model for modeling and prediction of survival data. Compared with pr
eviously studied methods, the new proposal can provide not only point estimate of survival probability but also quantification of the corresponding uncertainty, which can be of crucial importance in predictive modeling and subsequent decision making. The favorable statistical properties of point and uncertainty estimates were demonstrated by simulation studies and real data analysis. The Python code implementing the proposed approach was provided.
Differences between biological networks corresponding to disease conditions can help delineate the underlying disease mechanisms. Existing methods for differential network analysis do not account for dependence of networks on covariates. As a result,
these approaches may detect spurious differential connections induced by the effect of the covariates on both the disease condition and the network. To address this issue, we propose a general covariate-adjusted test for differential network analysis. Our method assesses differential network connectivity by testing the null hypothesis that the network is the same for individuals who have identical covariates and only differ in disease status. We show empirically in a simulation study that the covariate-adjusted test exhibits improved type-I error control compared with naive hypothesis testing procedures that do not account for covariates. We additionally show that there are settings in which our proposed methodology provides improved power to detect differential connections. We illustrate our method by applying it to detect differences in breast cancer gene co-expression networks by subtype.
Many time-to-event studies are complicated by the presence of competing risks. Such data are often analyzed using Cox models for the cause specific hazard function or Fine-Gray models for the subdistribution hazard. In practice regression relationshi
ps in competing risks data with either strategy are often complex and may include nonlinear functions of covariates, interactions, high-dimensional parameter spaces and nonproportional cause specific or subdistribution hazards. Model misspecification can lead to poor predictive performance. To address these issues, we propose a novel approach to flexible prediction modeling of competing risks data using Bayesian Additive Regression Trees (BART). We study the simulation performance in two-sample scenarios as well as a complex regression setting, and benchmark its performance against standard regression techniques as well as random survival forests. We illustrate the use of the proposed method on a recently published study of patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
Toxic blooms of Lyngbya majuscula occur in coastal areas worldwide and have major ecological, health and economic consequences. The exact causes and combinations of factors which lead to these blooms are not clearly understood. Lyngbya experts and st
akeholders are a particularly diverse group, including ecologists, scientists, state and local government representatives, community organisations, catchment industry groups and local fishermen. An integrated Bayesian network approach was developed to better understand and model this complex environmental problem, identify knowledge gaps, prioritise future research and evaluate management options.
This paper introduces a general framework for survival analysis based on ordinary differential equations (ODE). Specifically, this framework unifies many existing survival models, including proportional hazards models, linear transformation models, a
ccelerated failure time models, and time-varying coefficient models as special cases. Such a unified framework provides a novel perspective on modeling censored data and offers opportunities for designing new and more flexible survival model structures. Further, the aforementioned existing survival models are traditionally estimated by procedures that suffer from lack of scalability, statistical inefficiency, or implementation difficulty. Based on well-established numerical solvers and sensitivity analysis tools for ODEs, we propose a novel, scalable, and easy-to-implement general estimation procedure that is applicable to a wide range of models. In particular, we develop a sieve maximum likelihood estimator for a general semi-parametric class of ODE models as an illustrative example. We also establish a general sieve M-theorem for bundled parameters and show that the proposed sieve estimator is consistent and asymptotically normal, and achieves the semi-parametric efficiency bound. The finite sample performance of the proposed estimator is examined in simulation studies and a real-world data example.
سجل دخول لتتمكن من نشر تعليقات
التعليقات
جاري جلب التعليقات
سجل دخول لتتمكن من متابعة معايير البحث التي قمت باختيارها
