ﻻ يوجد ملخص باللغة العربية
We consider a slowly decaying oscillatory potential such that the corresponding 1D Schrodinger operator has a positive eigenvalue embedded into the absolutely continuous spectrum. This potential does not fall into a known class of initial data for which the Cauchy problem for the Korteweg-de Vries (KdV) equation can be solved by the inverse scattering transform. We nevertheless show that the KdV equation with our potential does admit a closed form classical solution in terms of Hankel operators. Comparing with rapidly decaying initial data our solution gains a new term responsible for the positive eigenvalue. To some extend this term resembles a positon (singular) solution but remains bounded. Our approach is based upon certain limiting arguments and techniques of Hankel operators.
The tt* equation that we will study here is classed as case 4a by Guest et al. in their series of papers Isomomodromy aspects of the tt* equations of Cecotti and Vafa. In their comprehensive works, Guest et al. give a lot of beautiful formulas on and
While 2D Gibbsian particle systems might exhibit orientational order resulting in a lattice-like structure, these particle systems do not exhibit positional order if the interaction between particles satisfies some weak assumptions. Here we investiga
We derive a bound on the total number of negative energy bound states in a potential in two spatial dimensions by using an adaptation of the Schwinger method to derive the Birman-Schwinger bound in three dimensions. Specifically, counting the number
Regarding $N$-soliton solutions, the trigonometric type, the hyperbolic type, and the exponential type solutions are well studied. While for the elliptic type solution, we know only the one-soliton solution so far. Using the commutative B{a}cklund tr
We show that the Cauchy problem for the KdV equation can be solved by the inverse scattering transform (IST) for any initial data bounded from below, decaying sufficiently rapidly at plus infinity, but unrestricted otherwise. Thus our approach doesnt require any boundary condition at minus infinity.