Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userAsteroseismic modelling of solar-type stars: internal systematics from input physics and surface correction methods
167
0
0.0
(
0
)
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
Asteroseismic forward modelling techniques are being used to determine fundamental properties (e.g. mass, radius, and age) of solar-type stars. The need to take into account all possible sources of error is of paramount importance towards a robust determination of stellar properties. We present a study of 34 solar-type stars for which high signal-to-noise asteroseismic data is available from multi-year Kepler photometry. We explore the internal systematics on the stellar properties, that is, associated with the uncertainty in the input physics used to construct the stellar models. In particular, we explore the systematics arising from: (i) the inclusion of the diffusion of helium and heavy elements; and (ii) the uncertainty in solar metallicity mixture. We also assess the systematics arising from (iii) different surface correction methods used in optimisation/fitting procedures. The systematics arising from comparing results of models with and without diffusion are found to be 0.5%, 0.8%, 2.1%, and 16% in mean density, radius, mass, and age, respectively. The internal systematics in age are significantly larger than the statistical uncertainties. We find the internal systematics resulting from the uncertainty in solar metallicity mixture to be 0.7% in mean density, 0.5% in radius, 1.4% in mass, and 6.7% in age. The surface correction method by Sonoi et al. and Ball & Gizons two-term correction produce the lowest internal systematics among the different correction methods, namely, ~1%, ~1%, ~2%, and ~8% in mean density, radius, mass, and age, respectively. Stellar masses obtained using the surface correction methods by Kjeldsen et al. and Ball & Gizons one-term correction are systematically higher than those obtained using frequency ratios.
rate research
Read More
Localised modelling error in the near-surface layers of evolutionary stellar models causes the frequencies of their normal modes of oscillation to differ from those of actual stars with matching interior structures. These frequency differences are referred to as the asteroseismic surface term. Global stellar properties estimated via detailed constraints on individual mode frequencies have previously been shown to be robust with respect to different parameterisations of this surface term. It has also been suggested that this may be true of a broader class of nonparametric treatments. We examine systematic differences in inferred stellar properties with respect to different surface-term treatments, both for a statistically large sample of main-sequence stars, as well as for a sample of red giants, for which no such characterisation has previously been done. For main-sequence stars, we demonstrate that while masses and radii, and hence ages, are indeed robust to the choice of surface term, the inferred initial helium abundance $Y_0$ is sensitive to the choice of surface correction. This implies that helium-abundance estimates returned from detailed asteroseismology are methodology-dependent. On the other hand, for our red giant sample, nonparametric surface corrections return dramatically different inferred stellar properties than parametric ones. The nature of these differences suggests that such nonparametric methods should be preferred for evolved stars; this should be verified on a larger sample.
Despite the fact that the initial helium abundance is an essential ingredient in modelling solar-type stars, its abundance in these stars remains a poorly constrained observational property. This is because the effective temperature in these stars is not high enough to allow helium ionization, not allowing any conclusions on its abundance when spectroscopic techniques are employed. To this end, stellar modellers resort to estimating the initial helium abundance via a semi-empirical helium-to-heavy element ratio, anchored to the the standard Big Bang nucleosynthesis value. Depending on the choice of solar composition used in stellar model computations, the helium-to-heavy element ratio, ($Delta Y/Delta Z$) is found to vary between 1 and 3. In this study, we use the Kepler LEGACY stellar sample, for which precise seismic data is available, and explore the systematic uncertainties on the inferred stellar parameters (radius, mass, and age) arising from adopting different values of $Delta Y/Delta Z$, specifically, 1.4 and 2.0. The stellar grid constructed with a higher $Delta Y / Delta Z$ value yields lower radius and mass estimates. We found systematic uncertainties of 1.1 per cent, 2.6 per cent, and 13.1 per cent on radius, mass, and ages, respectively.
Detailed understanding of stellar physics is essential towards a robust determination of stellar properties (e.g. radius, mass, and age). Among the vital input physics used in the modelling of solar-type stars which remain poorly constrained, is the initial helium abundance. To this end, when constructing stellar model grids, the initial helium abundance is estimated either (i) by using the semi-empirical helium-to-heavy element enrichment ratio, (${Delta Y}/{Delta Z}$), anchored to the standard Big Bang Nucleosynthesis value or (ii) by setting the initial helium abundance as a free variable. Adopting 35 low-mass, solar-type stars with multi-year Kepler photometry from the asteroseismic LEGACY sample, we explore the systematic uncertainties on the inferred stellar parameters (i.e., radius, mass, and age) arising from the treatment of the initial helium abundance in stellar model grids . The stellar masses and radii derived from grids with free initial helium abundance are lower compared to those from grids based on a fixed ${Delta Y}/{Delta Z}$ ratio. We find the systematic uncertainties on mean density, radius, mass, and age arising from grids which employ a fixed value of ${Delta Y}/{Delta Z}$ and those with free initial helium abundance to be $sim$ 0.9%, $sim$ 2%, $sim$ 5% and $sim$ 29%, respectively. We report that the systematic uncertainties on the inferred masses and radii arising from the treatment of initial helium abundance in stellar grids lie within the expected accuracy limits of ESAs PLATO, although this is not the case for the age.
Stellar magnetic activity decays over the main-sequence life of cool stars due to the stellar spin-down driven by magnetic braking. The evolution of chromospheric emission is well-studied for younger stars, but difficulties in determining the ages of older cool stars on the main sequence have complicated such studies for older stars in the past. Here we report on chromospheric Ca II H and K line measurements for 26 main-sequence cool stars with asteroseismic ages older than a gigayear and spectral types F and G. We find that for the G stars and the cooler F-type stars which still have convective envelopes the magnetic activity continues to decrease at stellar ages above one gigayear. Our magnetic activity measurements do not show evidence for a stalling of the magnetic braking mechanism, which has been reported for stellar rotation versus age for G and F type stars. We also find that the measured RHK indicator value for the cool F stars in our sample is lower than predicted by common age-activity relations that are mainly calibrated on data from young stellar clusters. We conclude that, within individual spectral type bins, chromospheric magnetic activity correlates well with stellar age even for old stars.
Models of solar-like oscillators yield acoustic modes at different frequencies than would be seen in actual stars possessing identical interior structure, due to modelling error near the surface. This asteroseismic surface term must be corrected when mode frequencies are used to infer stellar structure. Subgiants exhibit oscillations of mixed acoustic ($p$-mode) and gravity ($g$-mode) character, which defy description by the traditional $p$-mode asymptotic relation. Since nonparametric diagnostics of the surface term rely on this description, they cannot be applied to subgiants directly. In Paper I, we generalised such nonparametric methods to mixed modes, and showed that traditional surface-term corrections only account for mixed-mode coupling to, at best, first order in a perturbative expansion. Here, we apply those results, modelling subgiants using asteroseismic data. We demonstrate that, for grid-based inference of subgiant properties using individual mode frequencies, neglecting higher-order effects of mode coupling in the surface term results in significant systematic differences in the inferred stellar masses, and measurable systematics in other fundamental properties. While these systematics are smaller than those resulting from other choices of model construction, they persist for both parametric and nonparametric formulations of the surface term. This suggests that mode coupling should be fully accounted for when correcting for the surface term in seismic modelling with mixed modes, irrespective of the choice of correction used. The inferred properties of subgiants, in particular masses and ages, also depend on the choice of surface-term correction, in a different manner from both main-sequence and red giant stars.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
