Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userOn a necessary and sufficient identification condition of optimal treatment regimes with an instrumental variable
89
0
0.0
(
0
)
Added by
Yifan Cui
Publication date
2020
fields
Mathematical Statistics
and research's language is
English
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
Unmeasured confounding is a threat to causal inference and individualized decision making. Similar to Cui and Tchetgen Tchetgen (2020); Qiu et al. (2020); Han (2020a), we consider the problem of identification of optimal individualized treatment regimes with a valid instrumental variable. Han (2020a) provided an alternative identifying condition of optimal treatment regimes using the conditional Wald estimand of Cui and Tchetgen Tchetgen (2020); Qiu et al. (2020) when treatment assignment is subject to endogeneity and a valid binary instrumental variable is available. In this note, we provide a necessary and sufficient condition for identification of optimal treatment regimes using the conditional Wald estimand. Our novel condition is necessarily implied by those of Cui and Tchetgen Tchetgen (2020); Qiu et al. (2020); Han (2020a) and may continue to hold in a variety of potential settings not covered by prior results.
rate research
Read More
There is a fast-growing literature on estimating optimal treatment regimes based on randomized trials or observational studies under a key identifying condition of no unmeasured confounding. Because confounding by unmeasured factors cannot generally be ruled out with certainty in observational studies or randomized trials subject to noncompliance, we propose a general instrumental variable approach to learning optimal treatment regimes under endogeneity. Specifically, we establish identification of both value function $E[Y_{mathcal{D}(L)}]$ for a given regime $mathcal{D}$ and optimal regimes $text{argmax}_{mathcal{D}} E[Y_{mathcal{D}(L)}]$ with the aid of a binary instrumental variable, when no unmeasured confounding fails to hold. We also construct novel multiply robust classification-based estimators. Furthermore, we propose to identify and estimate optimal treatment regimes among those who would comply to the assigned treatment under a standard monotonicity assumption. In this latter case, we establish the somewhat surprising result that complier optimal regimes can be consistently estimated without directly collecting compliance information and therefore without the complier average treatment effect itself being identified. Our approach is illustrated via extensive simulation studies and a data application on the effect of child rearing on labor participation.
Optimal linear prediction (also known as kriging) of a random field ${Z(x)}_{xinmathcal{X}}$ indexed by a compact metric space $(mathcal{X},d_{mathcal{X}})$ can be obtained if the mean value function $mcolonmathcal{X}tomathbb{R}$ and the covariance function $varrhocolonmathcal{X}timesmathcal{X}tomathbb{R}$ of $Z$ are known. We consider the problem of predicting the value of $Z(x^*)$ at some location $x^*inmathcal{X}$ based on observations at locations ${x_j}_{j=1}^n$ which accumulate at $x^*$ as $ntoinfty$ (or, more generally, predicting $varphi(Z)$ based on ${varphi_j(Z)}_{j=1}^n$ for linear functionals $varphi, varphi_1, ldots, varphi_n$). Our main result characterizes the asymptotic performance of linear predictors (as $n$ increases) based on an incorrect second order structure $(tilde{m},tilde{varrho})$, without any restrictive assumptions on $varrho, tilde{varrho}$ such as stationarity. We, for the first time, provide necessary and sufficient conditions on $(tilde{m},tilde{varrho})$ for asymptotic optimality of the corresponding linear predictor holding uniformly with respect to $varphi$. These general results are illustrated by weakly stationary random fields on $mathcal{X}subsetmathbb{R}^d$ with Matern or periodic covariance functions, and on the sphere $mathcal{X}=mathbb{S}^2$ for the case of two isotropic covariance functions.
Inference on vertex-aligned graphs is of wide theoretical and practical importance.There are, however, few flexible and tractable statistical models for correlated graphs, and even fewer comprehensive approaches to parametric inference on data arising from such graphs. In this paper, we consider the correlated Bernoulli random graph model (allowing different Bernoulli coefficients and edge correlations for different pairs of vertices), and we introduce a new variance-reducing technique -- called emph{balancing} -- that can refine estimators for model parameters. Specifically, we construct a disagreement statistic and show that it is complete and sufficient; balancing can be interpreted as Rao-Blackwellization with this disagreement statistic. We show that for unbiased estimators of functions of model parameters, balancing generates uniformly minimum variance unbiased estimators (UMVUEs). However, even when unbiased estimators for model parameters do {em not} exist -- which, as we prove, is the case with both the heterogeneity correlation and the total correlation parameters -- balancing is still useful, and lowers mean squared error. In particular, we demonstrate how balancing can improve the efficiency of the alignment strength estimator for the total correlation, a parameter that plays a critical role in graph matchability and graph matching runtime complexity.
Estimating dynamic treatment regimes (DTRs) from retrospective observational data is challenging as some degree of unmeasured confounding is often expected. In this work, we develop a framework of estimating properly defined optimal DTRs with a time-varying instrumental variable (IV) when unmeasured covariates confound the treatment and outcome, rendering the potential outcome distributions only partially identified. We derive a novel Bellman equation under partial identification, use it to define a generic class of estimands (termed IV-optimal DTRs), and study the associated estimation problem. We then extend the IV-optimality framework to tackle the policy improvement problem, delivering IV-improved DTRs that are guaranteed to perform no worse and potentially better than a pre-specified baseline DTR. Importantly, our IV-improvement framework opens up the possibility of strictly improving upon DTRs that are optimal under the no unmeasured confounding assumption (NUCA). We demonstrate via extensive simulations the superior performance of IV-optimal and IV-improved DTRs over the DTRs that are optimal only under the NUCA. In a real data example, we embed retrospective observational registry data into a natural, two-stage experiment with noncompliance using a time-varying IV and estimate useful IV-optimal DTRs that assign mothers to high-level or low-level neonatal intensive care units based on their prognostic variables.
In order to analyze joint measurability of given measurements, we introduce a Hermitian operator-valued measure, called $W$-measure, such that it has marginals of positive operator-valued measures (POVMs). We prove that ${W}$-measure is a POVM {em if and only if} its marginal POVMs are jointly measurable. The proof suggests to employ the negatives of ${W}$-measure as an indicator for non-joint measurability. By applying triangle inequalities to the negativity, we derive joint measurability criteria for dichotomic and trichotomic variables. Also, we propose an operational test for the joint measurability in sequential measurement scenario.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
