Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userReconstruction of the Dark Energy equation of state from latest data: the impact of theoretical priors
60
0
0.0
(
0
)
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
We reconstruct the Equation of State of Dark Energy (EoS) from current data using a non-parametric approach where, rather than assuming a specific time evolution of this function, we bin it in time. We treat the transition between the bins with two different methods, i.e. a smoothed step function and a Gaussian Process reconstruction, investigating whether or not the two approaches lead to compatible results. Additionally, we include in the reconstruction procedure a correlation between the values of the EoS at different times in the form of a theoretical prior that takes into account a set of viability and stability requirements that one can impose on models alternative to $Lambda$CDM. In such case, we necessarily specialize to broad, but specific classes of alternative models, i.e. Quintessence and Horndeski gravity. We use data coming from CMB, Supernovae and BAO surveys. We find an overall agreement between the different reconstruction methods used; with both approaches, we find a time dependence of the mean of the reconstruction, with different trends depending on the class of model studied. The constant EoS predicted by the $Lambda$CDM model falls anyway within the $1sigma$ bounds of our analysis.
rate research
Read More
We develop an efficient, non-parametric Bayesian method for reconstructing the time evolution of the dark energy equation of state w(z) from observational data. Of particular importance is the choice of prior, which must be chosen carefully to minimise variance and bias in the reconstruction. Using a principal component analysis, we show how a correlated prior can be used to create a smooth reconstruction and also avoid bias in the mean behaviour of w(z). We test our method using Wiener reconstructions based on Fisher matrix projections, and also against more realistic MCMC analyses of simulated data sets for Planck and a future space-based dark energy mission. While the accuracy of our reconstruction depends on the smoothness of the assumed w(z), the relative error for typical dark energy models is <10% out to redshift z=1.5.
Non-parametric reconstruction of the dark energy equation of state (EoS) aims to determine the EoS as a function of redshift without invoking any particular dark energy model, so that the resulting EoS can be free of model-induced biases or artifacts. Without proper regularization, however, such reconstruction is often overwhelmed by the noise of poorly constrained modes. An intuitive regularization scheme is to assume a priori the dark energy EoS to evolve at most slowly with time, which may be enforced by a correlation between the EoS at different epochs. Indeed, studies that impose the correlation prior are able to significantly reduce the uncertainties of the reconstructed EoS and even show hints for dynamical dark energy. In this work, we examine the correlation prior using mock datasets of type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia), baryonic acoustic oscillations (BAOs), age-derived Hubble parameter, Hubble constant, and cosmic microwave background. We find that even though the prior is designed to disfavor evolving equations of state, it can still accommodate spurious oscillating features at high significance. Within the 1000 mock datasets of existing observations that are generated for the concordance cosmological model, i.e., the input dark energy EoS $w=-1$, there are 688 (69) cases recovering an EoS that departs from $-1$ by more than $1sigma$ ($2sigma$) in one or more redshift bins. The reconstructed EoS turns up and down markedly in many cases. Moreover, inverting the signs of the randomly assigned errors of the mock data more or less reverses the behavior of the EoS. Spurious results occur even more frequently when idealized SN Ia and BAO data from future surveys are included. Our tests suggest that further studies are needed to ensure accurate reconstruction of the EoS with the correlation prior.
We reconstruct evolution of the dark energy (DE) density using a nonparametric Bayesian approach from a combination of latest observational data. We caution against parameterizing DE in terms of its equation of state as it can be singular in modified gravity models, and using it introduces a bias preventing negative effective DE densities. We find a $3.7sigma$ preference for an evolving effective DE density with interesting features. For example, it oscillates around the $Lambda$CDM prediction at $zlesssim0.7$, and could be negative at $zgtrsim2.3$; dark energy can be pressure-less at multiple redshifts, and a short period of cosmic deceleration is allowed at $0.1 lesssim zlesssim 0.2$. We perform the reconstruction for several choices of the prior, as well as a evidence-weighted reconstruction. We find that some of the dynamical features, such as the oscillatory behaviour of the DE density, are supported by the Bayesian evidence, which is a first detection of a dynamical DE with a positive Bayesian evidence. The evidence-weighted reconstruction prefers a dynamical DE at a $(2.5pm0.06)sigma$ significance level.
This work determines the degree to which a standard Lambda-CDM analysis based on type Ia supernovae can identify deviations from a cosmological constant in the form of a redshift-dependent dark energy equation of state w(z). We introduce and apply a novel random curve generator to simulate instances of w(z) from constraint families with increasing distinction from a cosmological constant. After producing a series of mock catalogs of binned type Ia supernovae corresponding to each w(z) curve, we perform a standard Lambda-CDM analysis to estimate the corresponding posterior densities of the absolute magnitude of type Ia supernovae, the present-day matter density, and the equation of state parameter. Using the Kullback-Leibler divergence between posterior densities as a difference measure, we demonstrate that a standard type Ia supernova cosmology analysis has limited sensitivity to extensive redshift dependencies of the dark energy equation of state. In addition, we report that larger redshift-dependent departures from a cosmological constant do not necessarily manifest easier-detectable incompatibilities with the Lambda-CDM model. Our results suggest that physics beyond the standard model may simply be hidden in plain sight.
In the present paper, we investigate the dark energy equation of state using the Gaussian processes analysis method, without confining a particular parametrization. The reconstruction is carried out by adopting the background data including supernova and Hubble parameter, and perturbation data from the growth rate. It suggests that the background and perturbation data both present a hint of dynamical dark energy. However, the perturbation data have a more promising potential to distinguish non-evolution dark energy including the cosmological constant model. We also test the influence of some parameters on the reconstruction. We find that the matter density parameter $Omega_{m0}$ has a slight effect on the background data reconstruction, but has a notable influence on the perturbation data reconstruction. While the Hubble constant presents a significant influence on the reconstruction from background data.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
