Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userNon-Hermitian Hamilton operator in open quantum systems
206
0
0.0
(
0
)
Authors
Ingrid Rotter
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
In the Feshbach projection operator (FPO) formalism the whole function space is divided into two subspaces. One of them contains the wave functions localized in a certain finite region while the continuum of extended scattering wave functions is involved in the other subspace. The Hamilton operator of the whole system is Hermitian, that of the localized part is, however, non-Hermitian. This non-Hermitian Hamilton operator $H_{rm eff}$ represents the core of the FPO method in present-day studies. It gives a unified description of discrete and resonance states. Furthermore, it contains the time operator. The eigenvalues $z_lambda$ and eigenfunctions $phi_lambda$ of $H_{rm eff}$ are an important ingredient of the $S$ matrix. They are energy dependent. The phases of the $phi_lambda$ are, generally, nonrigid. Most interesting physical effects are caused by the branch points in the complex plane. On the one hand, they cause the avoided level crossings that appear as level repulsion or widths bifurcation in approaching the branch points under different conditions. On the other hand, observable values are usually enhanced and accelerated in the vicinity of the branch points. In most cases, the theory is time asymmetric. An exception are the ${cal PT}$ symmetric bound states in the continuum appearing in space symmetric systems due to the avoided level crossing phenomenon in the complex plane. In the paper, the peculiarities of the FPO method are considered and three typical phenomena are sketched: (i) the unified description of decay and scattering processes, (ii) the appearance of bound states in the continuum and (iii) the spectroscopic reordering processes characteristic of the regime with overlapping resonances.
rate research
Read More
Information on quantum systems can be obtained only when they are open (or opened) in relation to a certain environment. As a matter of fact, realistic open quantum systems appear in very different shape. We sketch the theoretical description of open quantum systems by means of a projection operator formalism elaborated many years ago, and applied by now to the description of different open quantum systems. The Hamiltonian describing the open quantum system is non-Hermitian. Most studied are the eigenvalues of the non-Hermitian Hamiltonian of many-particle systems embedded in one environment. We point to the unsolved problems of this method when applied to the description of realistic many-body systems. We then underline the role played by the eigenfunctions of the non-Hermitian Hamiltonian. Very interesting results originate from the fluctuations of the eigenfunctions in systems with gain and loss of excitons. They occur with an efficiency of nearly 100%. An example is the photosynthesis.
In part I, the formalism for the description of open quantum systems (that are embedded into a common well-defined environment) by means of a non-Hermitian Hamilton operator $ch$ is sketched. Eigenvalues and eigenfunctions are parametrically controlled. Using a 2$times$2 model, we study the eigenfunctions of $ch$ at and near to the singular exceptional points (EPs) at which two eigenvalues coalesce and the corresponding eigenfunctions differ from one another by only a phase. In part II, we provide the results of an analytical study for the eigenvalues of three crossing states. These crossing points are of measure zero. Then we show numerical results for the influence of a nearby (third) state onto an EP. Since the wavefunctions of the two crossing states are mixed in a finite parameter range around an EP, three states of a physical system will never cross in one point. Instead, the wavefunctions of all three states are mixed in a finite parameter range in which the ranges of the influence of different EPs overlap. We may relate these results to dynamical phase transitions observed recently in different experimental studies. The states on both sides of the phase transition are non-analytically connected.
It is still a challenge to experimentally realize shortcuts to adiabaticity (STA) for a non-Hermitian quantum system since a non-Hermitian quantum systems counterdiabatic driving Hamiltonian contains some unrealizable auxiliary control fields. In this paper, we relax the strict condition in constructing STA and propose a method to redesign a realizable supplementary Hamiltonian to construct non-Hermitian STA. The redesigned supplementary Hamiltonian can be eithersymmetric or asymmetric. For the sake of clearness, we apply this method to an Allen-Eberly model as an example to verify the validity of the optimized non-Hermitian STA. The numerical simulation demonstrates that a ultrafast population inversion could be realized in a two-level non-Hermitian system.
Models based on non-Hermitian Hamiltonians can exhibit a range of surprising and potentially useful phenomena. Physical realizations typically involve couplings to sources of incoherent gain and loss; this is problematic in quantum settings, because of the unavoidable fluctuations associated with this dissipation. Here, we present several routes for obtaining unconditional non-Hermitian dynamics in non-dissipative quantum systems. We exploit the fact that quadratic bosonic Hamiltonians that do not conserve particle number give rise to non-Hermitian dynamical matrices. We discuss the nature of these mappings from non-Hermitian to Hermitian Hamiltonians, and explore applications to quantum sensing, entanglement dynamics and topological band theory. The systems we discuss could be realized in a variety of photonic and phononic platforms using the ubiquitous resource of parametric driving.
The monopole for the geometric curvature is studied for non-Hermitian systems. We find that the monopole contains not only the exceptional points but also branch cuts. As the mathematical choice of branch cut in the complex plane is rather arbitrary, the monopole changes with the branch-cut choice. Despite this branch-cut dependence, our monopole is invariant under the $GL(l,mathbb{C})$ gauge transformation that is inherent in non-Hermitian systems. Although our results are generic, they are presented in the context of a two-mode non-Hermitian Dirac model. A corresponding two-mode Hermitian system is also discussed to illustrate the essential difference between monopoles in Hermitian systems and non-Hermitian systems.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
