Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userX-ray Galaxy Clusters in NoSOCS: Substructure and the Correlation of Optical and X-ray Properties
75
0
0.0
(
0
)
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
We present a comparison of optical and X-ray properties of galaxy clusters in the northern sky. We determine the recovery rate of X-ray detected clusters in the optical as a function of richness, redshift and X-ray luminosity, showing that the missed clusters are typically low contrast systems when observed optically. We employ four different statistical tests to test for the presence of substructure using optical two-dimensional data, finding that approximately 35% of the clusters show strong signs of substructure. However, the results are test-dependent, with variations also due to the magnitude range and radius utilized.We have also performed a comparison of X-ray luminosity and temperature with optical galaxy counts (richness). We find that the slope and scatter of the relations between richness and the X-ray properties are heavily dependent on the density contrast of the clusters. The selection of substructure-free systems does not improve the correlation between X-ray luminosity and richness, but this comparison also shows much larger scatter than one obtained using the X-ray temperature. In the latter case, the sample is significantly reduced because temperature measurements are available only for the most massive (and thus high contrast) systems. However, the comparison between temperature and richness is very sensitive to the exclusion of clusters showing signs of substructure. The correlation of X-ray luminosity and richness is based on the largest sample to date ($sim$ 750 clusters), while tests involving temperature use a similar number of objects as previous works ($lsim$100). The results presented here are in good agreement with existing literature.
rate research
Read More
We use SDSS data to investigate the scaling relations of 127 NoSOCS and 56 CIRS galaxy clusters at low redshift ($z le 0.10$). We show that richness and both optical and X-ray luminosities are reliable mass proxies. The scatter in mass at fixed observable is $sim$ 40%, depending on the aperture, sample and observable considered. For example, for the massive CIRS systems $sigma_{lnM500|N500}$ = 0.33 $pm$ 0.05 and $sigma_{lnM500|Lx}$ = 0.48 $pm$ 0.06. For the full sample $sigma_{lnM500|N500}$ = 0.43 $pm$ 0.03 and $sigma_{lnM500|Lx}$ = 0.56 $pm$ 0.06. We estimate substructure using two and three dimensional optical data, verifying that substructure has no significant effect on the cluster scaling relations (intercepts and slopes), independent of which substructure test we use. For a subset of twenty-one clusters, we estimate masses from the M-T$_X$ relation using temperature measures from BAX. The scaling relations derived from the optical and X-ray masses are indeed very similar, indicating that our method consistently estimates the cluster mass and yields equivalent results regardless of the wavelength from which we measure mass. For massive systems, we represent the mass-richness relation by a function with the form ${rm ln (M_{200}) = A + B times ln(N_{200}/60)}$, with M$_{200}$ being expressed in units of 10$^{14}$ M$_{odot}$. Using the virial mass, for CIRS clusters, we find A = (1.39 $pm$ 0.07) and B = (1.00 $pm$ 0.11). The relations based on the virial mass have a scatter of $sigma_{lnM200|N200}$ = 0.37 $pm$ 0.05, while $sigma_{lnM200|N200}$ = 0.77 $pm$ 0.22 for the caustic mass and $sigma_{lnM200|N200}$ = 0.34 $pm$ 0.08 for the temperature based mass (abridged).
We used optical imaging and spectroscopic data to derive substructure estimates for local Universe ($z < 0.11$) galaxy clusters from two different samples. The first was selected through the Sunyaev-Zeldovich (SZ) effect by the Planck satellite and the second is an X-ray selected sample. In agreement to X-ray substructure estimates we found that the SZ systems have a larger fraction of substructure than the X-ray clusters. We have also found evidence that the higher mass regime of the SZ clusters, compared to the X-ray sample, explains the larger fraction of disturbed objects in the Planck data. Although we detect a redshift evolution in the substructure fraction, it is not sufficient to explain the different results between the higher-z SZ sample and the X-ray one. We have also verified a good agreement ($sim$60$%$) between the optical and X-ray substructure estimates. However, the best level of agreement is given by the substructure classification given by measures based on the brightest cluster galaxy (BCG), either the BCG$-$X-ray centroid offset, or the magnitude gap between the first and second BCGs. We advocate the use of those two parameters as the most reliable and cheap way to assess cluster dynamical state. We recommend an offset cut of $sim$0.01$times$R$_{500}$ to separate relaxed and disturbed clusters. Regarding the magnitude gap the separation can be done at $Delta m_{12} = 1.0$. The central galaxy paradigm (CGP) may not be valid for $sim$20$%$ of relaxed massive clusters. This fraction increases to $sim$60$%$ for disturbed systems.
Galaxy clusters are widely used to constrain cosmological parameters through their properties, such as masses, luminosity and temperature distributions. One should take into account all kind of biases that could affect these analyses in order to obtain reliable constraints. In this work, we study the difference in the properties of clusters residing in different large scale environments, defined by their position within or outside of voids, and the density of their surrounding space. We use both observational and simulation cluster and void catalogues, i.e. XCS and redMaPPer clusters, BOSS voids, and Magneticum simulations. We devise two different environmental proxies for the clusters and study their redshift, richness, mass, X-ray luminosity and temperature distributions as well as some properties of their galaxy populations. We use the Kolmogorov-Smirnov two-sample test to discover that richer and more massive clusters are more prevalent in overdense regions and outside of voids. We also find that clusters of matched richness and mass in overdense regions and outside voids tend to have higher X-ray luminosities and temperatures. These differences could have important implications for precision cosmology with clusters of galaxies, since cluster mass calibrations can vary with environment.
Galaxy clusters structure, dominated by dark matter, is traced by member galaxies in the optical and hot intra-cluster medium (ICM) in X-rays. We compare the radial distribution of these components and determine the mass-to-light ratio vs. system mass relation. We use 14 clusters from the REXCESS sample which is representative of clusters detected in X-ray surveys. Photometric observations with the Wide Field Imager on the 2.2m MPG/ESO telescope are used to determine the number density profiles of the galaxy distribution out to $r_{200}$. These are compared to electron density profiles of the ICM obtained using XMM-Newton, and dark matter profiles inferred from scaling relations and an NFW model. While red sequence galaxies trace the total matter profile, the blue galaxy distribution is much shallower. We see a deficit of faint galaxies in the central regions of massive and regular clusters, and strong suppression of bright and faint blue galaxies in the centres of cool-core clusters, attributable to ram pressure stripping of gas from blue galaxies in high density regions of ICM and disruption of faint galaxies due to galaxy interactions. We find a mass-to-light ratio vs. mass relation within $r_{200}$ of $left(3.0pm0.4right) times 10^2, h,mathrm{M}_{odot},mathrm{L}_{odot}^{-1}$ at $10^{15},mathrm{M}_{odot}$ with slope $0.16 pm 0.14$, consistent with most previous results.
We present optical images for 9 new clusters of galaxies we have found in a reanalysis of the Einstein IPC images comprising the Extended Medium Sensitivity Survey (EMSS). Based on the presence of a red sequence of galaxies in a color-magnitude (CM) diagram, a redshift is estimated for each cluster. Galaxy overdensities (cluster richnesses) are measured in each field using the B_gc statistic which allows their plausible identification with the X-ray emission. The nature of our X-ray detection algorithm suggests that most of these clusters have low X-ray surface brightness (LSB) compared to the previously known EMSS clusters. We compare the optical and X-ray observations of these clusters with the well-studied Canadian Network for Observational Cosmology (CNOC) subsample of the EMSS, and conclude that the new clusters exhibit a similar range of optical richnesses, X-ray luminosities, and, somewhat surprisingly, galaxy populations as the predominantly rich, relaxed EMSS/CNOC clusters.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
