No Arabic abstract
We construct solar models with the newly calculated radiative opacities from the Opacity Project (OP) and recently determined (lower) heavy element abundances. We compare results from the new models with predictions of a series of models that use OPAL radiative opacities, older determinations of the surface heavy element abundances, and refinements of nuclear reaction rates. For all the variations we consider, solar models that are constructed with the newer and lower heavy element abundances advocated by Asplund et al. (2005) disagree by much more than the estimated measuring errors with helioseismological determinations of the depth of the solar convective zone, the surface helium composition, the internal sound speeds, and the density profile. Using the new OP radiative opacities, the ratio of the 8B neutrino flux calculated with the older and larger heavy element abundances (or with the newer and lower heavy element abundances) to the total neutrino flux measured by the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory is 1.09 (0.87) with a 9% experimental uncertainty and a 16% theoretical uncertainty, 1 sigma errors.
We present our results concerning a systematical analysis of helioseismic implications on solar structure and neutrino production. We find Y$_{ph}=0.238-0.259$, $R_b/R_odot=0.708-0.714$ and $rho_b=(0.185-0.199)$ gr/cm$^3$. In the interval $0.2<R/R_odot<0.65$, the quantity $U=P/rho$ is determined with and accuracy of $pm 5$permille~or better. At the solar center still one has remarkable accuracy, $Delta U/U <4%$. We compare the predictions of recent solar models (standard and non-standard) with the helioseismic results. By constructing helioseismically constrained solar models, the central solar temperature is found to be $T=1.58 times 10^7$K with a conservatively estimated accuracy of 1.4%, so that the major unceratainty on neutrino fluxes is due to nuclear cross section and not to solar inputs.
Using reconstructed opacities, we construct solar models with low heavy-element abundance. Rotational mixing and enhanced diffusion of helium and heavy elements are used to reconcile the recently observed abundances with helioseismology. The sound speed and density of models where the relative and absolute diffusion coefficients for helium and heavy elements have been increased agree with seismically inferred values at better than the 0.005 and 0.02 fractional level respectively. However, the surface helium abundance of the enhanced diffusion model is too low. The low helium problem in the enhanced diffusion model can be solved to a great extent by rotational mixing. The surface helium and the convection zone depth of rotating model M04R3, which has a surface Z of 0.0154, agree with the seismic results at the levels of 1 $sigma$ and 3 $sigma$ respectively. M04R3 is almost as good as the standard model M98. Some discrepancies between the models constructed in accord with the new element abundances and seismic constraints can be solved individually, but it seems difficult to resolve them as a whole scenario.
We derive a lower limit on the Beryllium neutrino flux on earth, $Phi(Be)_{min} = 1cdot 10^9 cm^{-2} s^{-1}$, in the absence of oscillations, by using helioseismic data, the B-neutrino flux measured by Superkamiokande and the hydrogen abundance at the solar center predicted by Standard Solar Model (SSM) calculations. We emphasize that this abundance is the only result of SSMs needed for getting $Phi(Be)_{min}$. We also derive lower bounds for the Gallium signal, $G_{min}=(91 pm 3) $ SNU, and for the Chlorine signal, $C_{min}=(3.24pm 0.14)$ SNU, which are about $3sigma$ above their corresponding experimental values, $G_{exp}= (72pm 6)$ SNU and $C_{exp}= (2.56pm 0.22) $ SNU.
We show that uncertainties in the values of the surface heavy element abundances of the Sun are the largest source of the theoretical uncertainty in calculating the p-p, pep, 8B, 13N, 15O, and 17F solar neutrino fluxes. We evaluate for the first time the sensitivity (partial derivative) of each solar neutrino flux with respect to the surface abundance of each element. We then calculate the uncertainties in each neutrino flux using `conservative (preferred) and `optimistic estimates for the uncertainties in the element abundances. The total conservative (optimistic) composition uncertainty in the predicted 8B neutrino flux is 11.6% (5.0%) when sensitivities to individual element abundances are used. The traditional method that lumps all abundances into a single quantity (total heavy element to hydrogen ratio, Z/X) yields a larger uncertainty, 20%. The uncertainties in the carbon, oxygen, neon, silicon, sulphur, and iron abundances all make significant contributions to the uncertainties in calculating solar neutrino fluxes; the uncertainties of different elements are most important for different neutrino fluxes. The uncertainty in the iron abundance is the largest source of the estimated composition uncertainties of the important 7Be and 8B solar neutrinos. Carbon is the largest contributor to the uncertainty in the calculation of the p-p, 13N, and 15O neutrino fluxes. However, for all neutrino fluxes, several elements contribute comparable amounts to the total composition uncertainty.
The recent revision of the solar chemical composition (Asplund, Grevesse and Sauval 2005)is characterized by about 40 per cent decrease of C, N, O, Ne, Ar abundances and by 20 percent decrease of Fe and some other metal abundances. We tested the effect of these modifications on the instability of Beta Cephei models. For the opacities, the newest OP data from the Opacity Project (Seaton 2005) were used. We show that the Beta Cephei instability domain in the Hertzsprung-Russel diagram, when computed with new data for Z=0.012 (revised solar value), is very similar to the instability domain computed earlier using the OPAL opacities for the older solar composition with Z=0.02. Almost all observed Beta Cephei variables are located within the instability domain. Two effects are responsible for stronger instability when using the new data: (i) Metal opacity bump in the OP case is located slightly deeper in the star than that in the OPAL case, which results in more effective driving; (ii) at a fixed Z value, the new Fe-group abundances are higher than the older ones because the Z value is determined mainly by the abundances of C, N, 0, and Ne.