Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userChandra High-Resolution Spectrum of the Anomalous X-ray Pulsar 4U 0142+61
99
0
0.0
(
0
)
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
We report on a 25 ks observation of the 8.7 s anomalous X-ray pulsar 4U~0142+61 with the High Energy Transmission Grating Spectrometer (HETGS) on the Chandra X-ray Observatory. The continuum spectrum is consistent with previous measurements and is well fit by an absorbed power-law + blackbody with photon index Gamma=3.3+/-0.4 and kT=0.418+/-0.013 keV. No evidence was found for emission or absorption lines, with an upper limit of ~50 eV on the equivalent width of broad features in the 2.5-13 A (0.95-5.0 keV) range and an upper limit of ~10 eV on the equivalent width of narrow features in the 4.1-17.7 A (0.7-3.0 keV) range. If the source is a magnetar, then the absence of a proton cyclotron line strongly constrains magnetar atmosphere models and hence the magnetic field strength of the neutron star. We find no strong features that are indicative of cyclotron absorption for magnetic field strengths of (1.9-9.8)x10^{14} G. This is still consistent with the dipole field strength of B=1.3x10^{14} G (at the polar cap) estimated from the pulsars spindown.
rate research
Read More
The energy source of the anomalous X-ray pulsars is not well understood, hence their designation as anomalous. Unlike binary X-ray pulsars, no companions are seen, so the energy cannot be supplied by accretion of matter from a companion star. The loss of rotational energy, which powers radio pulsars, is insufficient to power AXPs. Two models are generally considered: accretion from a large disk left over from the birth process, or decay of a very strong magnetic field (10^15 G) associated with a magnetar. The lack of counterparts at other wavelengths has hampered progress in our understanding of these objects. Here, we present deep optical observations of the field around 4U 0142+61, which is the brightest AXP in X-rays. We find an object with peculiar optical colours at the position of the X-ray source, and argue that it is the optical counterpart. The optical emission is too faint to admit the presence of a large accretion disk, but may be consistent with magnetospheric emission from a magnetar.
We have searched for pulsation of the anomalous X-ray pulsar (AXP) 4U 0142+61 in the K band ($lambda_{rm eff} = 2.11$ $mu$m) using the fast-readout mode of IRCS at the Subaru 8.2-m telescope. We found no significant signal at the pulse frequency expected by the precise ephemeris obtained by the X-ray monitoring observation with RXTE. Nonetheless, we obtained a best upper limit of 17% (90% C.L.) for the root-mean-square pulse fraction in the K band. Combined with i band pulsation (Dhillon et al. 2005), the slope of the pulsed component ($F_ u propto u^alpha$) was constrained to $alpha > -0.87$ (90% C.L.) for an interstellar extinction of $A_{V} = 3.5$.
We present results obtained from X-ray observations of the anomalous X-ray pulsar (AXP) 4U 0142+61 taken between 2000-2007 using XMM-Newton, Chandra and Swift. In observations taken before 2006, the pulse profile is observed to become more sinusoidal and the pulsed fraction increased with time. These results confirm those derived using the Rossi X-ray Timing Explorer and expand the observed evolution to energies below 2 keV. The XMM-Newton total flux in the 0.5-10 keV band is observed to be nearly constant in observations taken before 2006, while an increase of ~10% is seen afterwards and coincides with the burst activity detected from the source in 2006-2007. After these bursts, the evolution towards more sinusoidal pulse profiles ceased while the pulsed fraction showed a further increase. No evidence for large-scale, long-term changes in the emission as a result of the bursts is seen. The data also suggest a correlation between the flux and hardness of the spectrum, with brighter observations on average having a harder spectrum. As pointed out by other authors, we find that the standard blackbody plus power-law model does not provide the best spectral fit to the emission from 4U 0142+61. We also report on observations taken with the Gemini telescope after two bursts. These observations show source magnitudes consistent with previous measurements. Our results demonstrate the wide range of X-ray variability characteristics seen in AXPs and we discuss them in light of current emission models for these sources.
We report on 10 years of monitoring of the 8.7-s Anomalous X-ray Pulsar 4U 0142+61 using the Rossi X-Ray Timing Explorer (RXTE). This pulsar exhibited stable rotation from 2000 March until 2006 February: the RMS phase residual for a spin-down model which includes nu, nudot, and nuddot is 2.3%. We report a possible phase-coherent timing solution valid over a 10-yr span extending back to March 1996. A glitch may have occured between 1998 and 2000, but is not required by the existing timing data. The pulse profile has been evolving since 2000. In particular, the dip of emission between its two peaks got shallower between 2002 and 2006, as if the profile were evolving back to its pre-2000 morphology, following an earlier event, which possibly also included the glitch suggested by the timing data. These profile variations are seen in the 2-4 keV band but not in 6-8 keV. We also detect a slow increase in the pulsed flux between 2002 May and 2004 December, such that it has risen by 36+/-3% over 2.6 years in the 2-10 keV band. The pulsed flux variability and the narrow-band pulse profile changes present interesting challenges to aspects of the magnetar model.
We report on our Spitzer observations of the anomalous X-ray pulsar 4U 0142+61, made following a large X-ray burst that occurred on 2007 February 7. To search for mid-infrared flux variations, four imaging observations were carried out at 4.5 and 8.0 $mu$m with the Infrared Array Camera from February 14 to 21. No significant flux variations were detected, and the average fluxes were 32.1$pm$2.0 $mu$Jy at 4.5 $mu$m and 59.8$pm8.5$ $mu$Jy at 8.0 $mu$m, consistent with those obtained in 2005. The non-detection of variability is interesting in light of reported rapid variability from this source in the near-infrared, but consistent with the fact that the source already went back to its quiescent state before our observations began, as indicated by contemporaneous X-ray observations. In order to understand the origin of the near-infrared variability, frequent, simultaneous multi-wavelength observations are needed.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
