No Arabic abstract
During supernova explosions, strange stars with almost bare quark surfaces may be formed. Under certain conditions, these stars could be rapidly spun down by the torque exerted by the fossil disks formed from the fall-back materials. They may also receive large kicks and hence, have large proper motion velocities. When these strange stars pass through the spherical ``Oort comet cloud formed during the pre-supernova era, they will capture some small-scale comet clouds and collide with some comet-like objects occasionally. These impacts can account for the repeating bursts as observed from the soft gamma repeaters (SGRs). According to this picture, it is expected that SGR 1900+14 will become active again during 2004-2005.
Soft gamma-ray repeaters (SGRs) and anomalous x-ray pulsars (AXPs) are young and radio-quiet x-ray pulsars which have been rapidly spun-down to slow spin periods clustered in the range 5-12 s. Most of these unusual pulsars also appear to be associated with supernova shell remnants (SNRs) with typical ages <30 kyr. By examining the sizes of these remnants versus their ages, we demonstrate that the interstellar media which surrounded the SGR and AXP progenitors and their SNRs were unusually dense compared to the environments around most young radio pulsars and SNRs. We explore the implications of this evidence on magnetar and propeller-based models for the rapid spin-down of SGRs and AXPs. We find that evidence of dense environments is not consistent with the magnetar model unless a causal link can be shown between the development of magnetars and the external ISM. Propeller-driven spin-down by fossil accretion disks for SGRs and AXPs appears to be consistent with dense environments since the environment can facilitate the formation of such a disk. This may occur in two ways: 1) formation of a ``pushback disks from the innermost ejecta pushed back by prompt reverse shocks from supernova remnant interactions with massive progenitor wind material stalled in dense surrounding gas, or 2) acquisition of disks by a high velocity neutron stars, which may be able to capture a sufficient amounts of co-moving outflowing ejecta slowed by the prompt reverse shocks in dense environments.
We argue that giant flares in SGRs can be associated to the core conversion of an isolated neutron star having a subcritical magnetic field $sim 10^{12}$ G and a fallback disk around it. We show that, in a timescale of $lesssim 10^5$ yrs, accretion from the fallback disk can increase the mass of the central object up to the critical mass for the conversion of the core of the star into quark matter. A small fraction of the neutrino-antineutrino emission from the just-converted quark-matter hot core annihilates into $e^+e^-$ pairs above the neutron star surface originating the gamma emission of the spike while the further cooling of the heated neutron star envelope originates the tail of the burst. We show that several characteristics of the giant flare of the SGR 1806-20 of 27 December 2004 (spike and tail energies, timescales, and spectra) can be explained by this mechanism.
The energy source powering the X-ray emission from anomalous X-ray pulsars (AXPs) and soft gamma-ray repeaters (SGRs) is still uncertain. In one scenario, the presence of an ultramagnetized neutron star, or ``magnetar, with B on the order of 10^{14} - 10^{15} G is invoked. To investigate this hypothesis, we have analyzed archival ASCA data for several known AXPs and SGRs, and fitted them with a model in which all or part of the X-ray flux originates as thermal emission from a magnetar. Our magnetar spectral model includes the effects of the anisotropy of the heat flow through an ultramagnetized neutron star envelope, reprocessing by a light element atmosphere, and general relativistic corrections to the observed spectrum. We obtain good fits to the data with radii for the emitting areas which are generally consistent with those expected for neutron stars, in contrast to blackbody (BB) fits, which imply much smaller radii. Furthermore, the inclusion of atmospheric effects results in inferred temperatures which are lower than those implied by BB fits, but however still too high to be accounted by thermal cooling alone. An extra source of heating (possibly due to magnetic field decay) is needed. Despite the harder tail in the spectrum produced by reprocessing of the outgoing flux through the atmosphere, spectral fits still require a considerable fraction of the flux to be in a power-law component.
Infrared observations of the environment of the two Soft Gamma-ray Repeaters (SGRs) with the best known locations on the sky show that they are associated to clusters of massive stars. Observations with ISO revealed that SGR 1806-20 is in a cluster of giant massive stars, still enshrouded in a dense cloud of gas and dust. SGR 1900+14 is at the edge of a similar cluster that was recently found hidden in the glare of a pair of M5 supergiant stars. Since none of the stars of these clusters has shown in the last years significant flux variations in the infrared, these two SGRs do not form bound binary systems with massive stars. SGR 1806-20 is at only ~ 0.4 pc, and SGR 1900+14 at ~ 0.8 pc from the centers of their parental star clusters. If these SGRs were born with typical neutron star runaway velocities of ~ 300 km/s, they are not older than a few 10$^{3}$ years. We propose that SGR 1806-20 and SGR 1900+14 are ideal laboratories to study the evolution of supernovae explosions inside interstellar bubbles produced by the strong winds that prevail in clusters of massive stars.
In this short note I discuss the hypothesis that bursting activity of magnetars evolves in time analogously to the glitching activity of normal radio pulsars (i.e. sources are more active at smaller ages), and that the increase of the burst rate follows one of the laws established for glitching radio pulsars. If the activity of soft gamma repeaters decreases in time in the way similar to the evolution of core-quake glitches ($propto t^{5/2}$), then it is more probable to find the youngest soft gamma repeaters, but the energy of giant flares from these sources should be smaller than observed $10^{44}$ --$10^{46}$ ergs as the total energy stored in a magnetars magnetic field is not enough to support thousands of bursts similar to the prototype 5 March 1979 flare.