Background: Predicted probabilities from a risk prediction model are inevitably uncertain. This uncertainty has mostly been studied from a statistical perspective. We apply Value of Information methodology to evaluate the decision-theoretic implications of prediction uncertainty. Methods: Adopting a Bayesian perspective, we extend the definition of the Expected Value of Perfect Information (EVPI) from decision analysis to net benefit calculations in risk prediction. EVPI is the expected gain in net benefit by using the correct predictions as opposed to predictions from a proposed model. We suggest bootstrap methods for sampling from the posterior distribution of predictions for EVPI calculation using Monte Carlo simulations. In a case study, we used subsets of data of various sizes from a clinical trial for predicting mortality after myocardial infarction to show how EVPI can be interpreted and how it changes with sample size. Results: With a sample size of 1,000, EVPI was 0 at threshold values larger than 0.6, indicating there is no point in procuring more development data for such thresholds. At thresholds of 0.4-0.6, the proposed model was not net beneficial, but EVPI was positive, indicating that obtaining more development data might be justified. Across all thresholds, the gain in net benefit by using the correct model was 24% higher than the gain by using the proposed model. EVPI declined with larger samples and was generally low with sample sizes of 4,000 or greater. We summarize an algorithm for incorporating EVPI calculations into the commonly used bootstrap method for optimism correction. Conclusion: Value of Information methods can be applied to explore decision-theoretic consequences of uncertainty in risk prediction, and can complement inferential methods when developing or validating risk prediction models.
Download