No Arabic abstract
Population size estimation based on the capture-recapture experiment is an interesting problem in various fields including epidemiology, criminology, demography, etc. In many real-life scenarios, there exists inherent heterogeneity among the individuals and dependency between capture and recapture attempts. A novel trivariate Bernoulli model is considered to incorporate these features, and the Bayesian estimation of the model parameters is suggested using data augmentation. Simulation results show robustness under model misspecification and the superiority of the performance of the proposed method over existing competitors. The method is applied to analyse real case studies on epidemiological surveillance. The results provide interesting insight on the heterogeneity and dependence involved in the capture-recapture mechanism. The methodology proposed can assist in effective decision-making and policy formulation.
Currently, the high-precision estimation of nonlinear parameters such as Gini indices, low-income proportions or other measures of inequality is particularly crucial. In the present paper, we propose a general class of estimators for such parameters that take into account univariate auxiliary information assumed to be known for every unit in the population. Through a nonparametric model-assisted approach, we construct a unique system of survey weights that can be used to estimate any nonlinear parameter associated with any study variable of the survey, using a plug-in principle. Based on a rigorous functional approach and a linearization principle, the asymptotic variance of the proposed estimators is derived, and variance estimators are shown to be consistent under mild assumptions. The theory is fully detailed for penalized B-spline estimators together with suggestions for practical implementation and guidelines for choosing the smoothing parameters. The validity of the method is demonstrated on data extracted from the French Labor Force Survey. Point and confidence intervals estimation for the Gini index and the low-income proportion are derived. Theoretical and empirical results highlight our interest in using a nonparametric approach versus a parametric one when estimating nonlinear parameters in the presence of auxiliary information.
Population size estimation based on two sample capture-recapture type experiment is an interesting problem in various fields including epidemiology, pubic health, population studies, etc. The Lincoln-Petersen estimate is popularly used under the assumption that capture and recapture status of each individual is independent. However, in many real life scenarios, there is an inherent dependency between capture and recapture attempts which is not well-studied in the literature of the dual system or two sample capture-recapture method. In this article, we propose a novel model that successfully incorporates the possible causal dependency and provide corresponding estimation methodologies for the associated model parameters based on post-stratified two sample capture-recapture data. The superiority of the performance of the proposed model over the existing competitors is established through an extensive simulation study. The method is illustrated through analysis of some real data sets.
With the advent of continuous health monitoring via wearable devices, users now generate their unique streams of continuous data such as minute-level physical activity or heart rate. Aggregating these streams into scalar summaries ignores the distributional nature of data and often leads to the loss of critical information. We propose to capture the distributional properties of wearable data via user-specific quantile functions that are further used in functional regression and multi-modal distributional modelling. In addition, we propose to encode user-specific distributional information with user-specific L-moments, robust rank-based analogs of traditional moments. Importantly, this L-moment encoding results in mutually consistent functional and distributional interpretation of the results of scalar-on-function regression. We also demonstrate how L-moments can be flexibly employed for analyzing joint and individual sources of variation in multi-modal distributional data. The proposed methods are illustrated in a study of association of accelerometry-derived digital gait biomarkers with Alzheimers disease (AD) and in people with normal cognitive function. Our analysis shows that the proposed quantile-based representation results in a much higher predictive performance compared to simple distributional summaries and attains much stronger associations with clinical cognitive scales.
In the context of a pandemic like COVID-19, and until most people are vaccinated, proactive testing and interventions have been proved to be the only means to contain the disease spread. Recent academic work has offered significant evidence in this regard, but a critical question is still open: Can we accurately identify all new infections that happen every day, without this being forbiddingly expensive, i.e., using only a fraction of the tests needed to test everyone everyday (complete testing)? Group testing offers a powerful toolset for minimizing the number of tests, but it does not account for the time dynamics behind the infections. Moreover, it typically assumes that people are infected independently, while infections are governed by community spread. Epidemiology, on the other hand, does explore time dynamics and community correlations through the well-established continuous-time SIR stochastic network model, but the standard model does not incorporate discrete-time testing and interventions. In this paper, we introduce a discrete-time SIR stochastic block model that also allows for group testing and interventions on a daily basis. Our model can be regarded as a discrete version of the continuous-time SIR stochastic network model over a specific type of weighted graph that captures the underlying community structure. We analyze that model w.r.t. the minimum number of group tests needed everyday to identify all infections with vanishing error probability. We find that one can leverage the knowledge of the community and the model to inform nonadaptive group testing algorithms that are order-optimal, and therefore achieve the same performance as complete testing using a much smaller number of tests.
Disease maps display the spatial pattern in disease risk, so that high-risk clusters can be identified. The spatial structure in the risk map is typically represented by a set of random effects, which are modelled with a conditional autoregressive (CAR) prior. Such priors include a global spatial smoothing parameter, whereas real risk surfaces are likely to include areas of smooth evolution as well as discontinuities, the latter of which are known as risk boundaries. Therefore, this paper proposes an extension to the class of CAR priors, which can identify both areas of localised spatial smoothness and risk boundaries. However, allowing for this localised smoothing requires large numbers of correlation parameters to be estimated, which are unlikely to be well identified from the data. To address this problem we propose eliciting an informative prior about the locations of such boundaries, which can be combined with the information from the data to provide more precise posterior inference. We test our approach by simulation, before applying it to a study of the risk of emergency admission to hospital in Greater Glasgow, Scotland.