Collaborative inference has recently emerged as an intriguing framework for applying deep learning to Internet of Things (IoT) applications, which works by splitting a DNN model into two subpart models respectively on resource-constrained IoT devices and the cloud. Even though IoT applications raw input data is not directly exposed to the cloud in such framework, revealing the local-part models intermediate output still entails privacy risks. For mitigation of privacy risks, differential privacy could be adopted in principle. However, the practicality of differential privacy for collaborative inference under various conditions remains unclear. For example, it is unclear how the calibration of the privacy budget epsilon will affect the protection strength and model accuracy in presence of the state-of-the-art reconstruction attack targeting collaborative inference, and whether a good privacy-utility balance exists. In this paper, we provide the first systematic study to assess the effectiveness of differential privacy for protecting collaborative inference in presence of the reconstruction attack, through extensive empirical evaluations on various datasets. Our results show differential privacy can be used for collaborative inference when confronted with the reconstruction attack, with insights provided about privacyutility trade-offs. Specifically, across the evaluated datasets, we observe there exists a suitable privacy budget range (particularly 100<=epsilon<=200 in our evaluation) providing a good tradeoff between utility and privacy protection. Our key observation drawn from our study is that differential privacy tends to perform better in collaborative inference for datasets with smaller intraclass variations, which, to our knowledge, is the first easy-toadopt practical guideline.
Download