Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userHierarchical clustering in particle physics through reinforcement learning
62
0
0.0
(
0
)
Added by
Johann Brehmer Mr
Publication date
2020
fields
Informatics Engineering
and research's language is
English
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
Particle physics experiments often require the reconstruction of decay patterns through a hierarchical clustering of the observed final-state particles. We show that this task can be phrased as a Markov Decision Process and adapt reinforcement learning algorithms to solve it. In particular, we show that Monte-Carlo Tree Search guided by a neural policy can construct high-quality hierarchical clusterings and outperform established greedy and beam search baselines.
rate research
Read More
Hierarchical reinforcement learning (HRL) helps address large-scale and sparse reward issues in reinforcement learning. In HRL, the policy model has an inner representation structured in levels. With this structure, the reinforcement learning task is expected to be decomposed into corresponding levels with sub-tasks, and thus the learning can be more efficient. In HRL, although it is intuitive that a high-level policy only needs to make macro decisions in a low frequency, the exact frequency is hard to be simply determined. Previous HRL approaches often employed a fixed-time skip strategy or learn a terminal condition without taking account of the context, which, however, not only requires manual adjustments but also sacrifices some decision granularity. In this paper, we propose the emph{temporal-adaptive hierarchical policy learning} (TEMPLE) structure, which uses a temporal gate to adaptively control the high-level policy decision frequency. We train the TEMPLE structure with PPO and test its performance in a range of environments including 2-D rooms, Mujoco tasks, and Atari games. The results show that the TEMPLE structure can lead to improved performance in these environments with a sequential adaptive high-level control.
Cognitive Psychology and related disciplines have identified several critical mechanisms that enable intelligent biological agents to learn to solve complex problems. There exists pressing evidence that the cognitive mechanisms that enable problem-solving skills in these species build on hierarchical mental representations. Among the most promising computational approaches to provide comparable learning-based problem-solving abilities for artificial agents and robots is hierarchical reinforcement learning. However, so far the existing computational approaches have not been able to equip artificial agents with problem-solving abilities that are comparable to intelligent animals, including human and non-human primates, crows, or octopuses. Here, we first survey the literature in Cognitive Psychology, and related disciplines, and find that many important mental mechanisms involve compositional abstraction, curiosity, and forward models. We then relate these insights with contemporary hierarchical reinforcement learning methods, and identify the key machine intelligence approaches that realise these mechanisms. As our main result, we show that all important cognitive mechanisms have been implemented independently in isolated computational architectures, and there is simply a lack of approaches that integrate them appropriately. We expect our results to guide the development of more sophisticated cognitively inspired hierarchical methods, so that future artificial agents achieve a problem-solving performance on the level of intelligent animals.
We investigate active learning by pairwise similarity over the leaves of trees originating from hierarchical clustering procedures. In the realizable setting, we provide a full characterization of the number of queries needed to achieve perfect reconstruction of the tree cut. In the non-realizable setting, we rely on known important-sampling procedures to obtain regret and query complexity bounds. Our algorithms come with theoretical guarantees on the statistical error and, more importantly, lend themselves to linear-time implementations in the relevant parameters of the problem. We discuss such implementations, prove running time guarantees for them, and present preliminary experiments on real-world datasets showing the compelling practical performance of our algorithms as compared to both passive learning and simple active learning baselines.
This work is inspired by recent advances in hierarchical reinforcement learning (HRL) (Barto and Mahadevan 2003; Hengst 2010), and improvements in learning efficiency from heuristic-based subgoal selection, experience replay (Lin 1993; Andrychowicz et al. 2017), and task-based curriculum learning (Bengio et al. 2009; Zaremba and Sutskever 2014). We propose a new method to integrate HRL, experience replay and effective subgoal selection through an implicit curriculum design based on human expertise to support sample-efficient learning and enhance interpretability of the agents behavior. Human expertise remains indispensable in many areas such as medicine (Buch, Ahmed, and Maruthappu 2018) and law (Cath 2018), where interpretability, explainability and transparency are crucial in the decision making process, for ethical and legal reasons. Our method simplifies the complex task sets for achieving the overall objectives by decomposing them into subgoals at different levels of abstraction. Incorporating relevant subjective knowledge also significantly reduces the computational resources spent in exploration for RL, especially in high speed, changing, and complex environments where the transition dynamics cannot be effectively learned and modelled in a short time. Experimental results in two StarCraft II (SC2) (Vinyals et al. 2017) minigames demonstrate that our method can achieve better sample efficiency than flat and end-to-end RL methods, and provides an effective method for explaining the agents performance.
Can artificial agents learn to assist others in achieving their goals without knowing what those goals are? Generic reinforcement learning agents could be trained to behave altruistically towards others by rewarding them for altruistic behaviour, i.e., rewarding them for benefiting other agents in a given situation. Such an approach assumes that other agents goals are known so that the altruistic agent can cooperate in achieving those goals. However, explicit knowledge of other agents goals is often difficult to acquire. Even assuming such knowledge to be given, training of altruistic agents would require manually-tuned external rewards for each new environment. Thus, it is beneficial to develop agents that do not depend on external supervision and can learn altruistic behaviour in a task-agnostic manner. Assuming that other agents rationally pursue their goals, we hypothesize that giving them more choices will allow them to pursue those goals better. Some concrete examples include opening a door for others or safeguarding them to pursue their objectives without interference. We formalize this concept and propose an altruistic agent that learns to increase the choices another agent has by maximizing the number of states that the other agent can reach in its future. We evaluate our approach on three different multi-agent environments where another agents success depends on the altruistic agents behaviour. Finally, we show that our unsupervised agents can perform comparably to agents explicitly trained to work cooperatively. In some cases, our agents can even outperform the supervised ones.
suggested questions
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
