Despite the nonlinear nature of turbulence, there is evidence that part of the energy-transfer mechanisms sustaining wall turbulence can be ascribed to linear processes. The different scenarios stem from linear stability theory and comprise exponential instabilities, neutral modes, transient growth from non-normal operators, and parametric instabilities from temporal mean-flow variations, among others. These mechanisms, each potentially capable of leading to the observed turbulence structure, are rooted in theoretical and conceptual arguments. Whether the flow follows any or a combination of them remains elusive. Here, we evaluate the linear mechanisms responsible for the energy transfer from the streamwise-averaged mean-flow ($bf U$) to the fluctuating velocities ($bf u$). We use cause-and-effect analysis based on interventions. This is achieved by direct numerical simulation of turbulent channel flows at low Reynolds number, in which the energy transfer from $bf U$ to $bf u$ is constrained to preclude a targeted linear mechanism. We show that transient growth is sufficient for sustaining realistic wall turbulence. Self-sustaining turbulence persists when exponential instabilities, neutral modes, and parametric instabilities of the mean flow are suppressed. We further show that a key component of transient growth is the Orr/push-over mechanism induced by spanwise variations of the base flow. Finally, we demonstrate that an ensemble of simulations with various frozen-in-time $bf U$ arranged so that only transient growth is active, can faithfully represent the energy transfer from $bf U$ to $bf u$ as in realistic turbulence. Our approach provides direct cause-and-effect evaluation of the linear energy-injection mechanisms from $bf U$ to $bf u$ in the fully nonlinear system and simplifies the conceptual model of self-sustaining wall turbulence.
Download