Do you want to publish a course? Click here

Dynamical Systems and Neural Networks

92   0   0.0 ( 0 )
 Added by Akshunna S. Dogra
 Publication date 2020
and research's language is English




Ask ChatGPT about the research

Neural Networks (NNs) have been identified as a potentially powerful tool in the study of complex dynamical systems. A good example is the NN differential equation (DE) solver, which provides closed form, differentiable, functional approximations for the evolution of a wide variety of dynamical systems. A major disadvantage of such NN solvers can be the amount of computational resources needed to achieve accuracy comparable to existing numerical solvers. We present new strategies for existing dynamical system NN DE solvers, making efficient use of the textit{learnt} information, to speed up their training process, while still pursuing a completely unsupervised approach. We establish a fundamental connection between NN theory and dynamical systems theory via Koopman Operator Theory (KOT), by showing that the usual training processes for Neural Nets are fertile ground for identifying multiple Koopman operators of interest. We end by illuminating certain applications that KOT might have for NNs in general.



rate research

Read More

We propose the GENERIC formalism informed neural networks (GFINNs) that obey the symmetric degeneracy conditions of the GENERIC formalism. GFINNs comprise two modules, each of which contains two components. We model each component using a neural network whose architecture is designed to satisfy the required conditions. The component-wise architecture design provides flexible ways of leveraging available physics information into neural networks. We prove theoretically that GFINNs are sufficiently expressive to learn the underlying equations, hence establishing the universal approximation theorem. We demonstrate the performance of GFINNs in three simulation problems: gas containers exchanging heat and volume, thermoelastic double pendulum and the Langevin dynamics. In all the examples, GFINNs outperform existing methods, hence demonstrating good accuracy in predictions for both deterministic and stochastic systems.
194 - Lee DeVille , Eugene Lerman 2013
We propose a new framework for the study of continuous time dynamical systems on networks. We view such dynamical systems as collections of interacting control systems. We show that a class of maps between graphs called graph fibrations give rise to maps between dynamical systems on networks. This allows us to produce conjugacy between dynamical systems out of combinatorial data. In particular we show that surjective graph fibrations lead to synchrony subspaces in networks. The injective graph fibrations, on the other hand, give rise to surjective maps from large dynamical systems to smaller ones. One can view these surjections as a kind of fast/slow variable decompositions or as abstractions in the computer science sense of the word.
Many systems of interest in science and engineering are made up of interacting subsystems. These subsystems, in turn, could be made up of collections of smaller interacting subsystems and so on. In a series of papers David Spivak with collaborators formalized these kinds of structures (systems of systems) as algebras over presentable colored operads. It is also very useful to consider maps between dynamical systems. This amounts to viewing dynamical systems as objects in an appropriate category. This is the point taken by DeVille and Lerman in the study of dynamics on networks. The goal of this paper is to describe an algebraic structure that encompasses both approaches to systems of systems. To this end we replace the monoidal category of wiring diagrams by a monoidal double category whose objects are surjective submersions. This allows us, on one hand, build new large open systems out of collections of smaller open subsystems and on the other keep track of maps between open systems. As a special case we recover the results of DeVille and Lerman on fibrations of networks of manifolds.
In the study of reaction networks and the polynomial dynamical systems that they generate, special classes of networks with important properties have been identified. These include reversible, weakly reversible}, and, more recently, endotactic networks. While some inclusions between these network types are clear, such as the fact that all reversible networks are weakly reversible, other relationships are more complicated. Adding to this complexity is the possibility that inclusions be at the level of the dynamical systems generated by the networks rather than at the level of the networks themselves. We completely characterize the inclusions between reversible, weakly reversible, endotactic, and strongly endotactic network, as well as other less well studied network types. In particular, we show that every strongly endotactic network in two dimensions can be generated by an extremally weakly reversible network. We also introduce a new class of source-only networks, which is a computationally convenient property for networks to have, and show how this class relates to the above mentioned network types.
We give a description of the link between topological dynamical systems and their dimension groups. The focus is on minimal systems and, in particular, on substitution shifts. We describe in detail the various classes of systems including Sturmian shifts and interval exchange shifts. This is a preliminary version of a book which will be published by Cambridge University Press. Any comments are of course welcome.
comments
Fetching comments Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
mircosoft-partner

هل ترغب بارسال اشعارات عن اخر التحديثات في شمرا-اكاديميا