Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userLast Round Convergence and No-Instant Regret in Repeated Games with Asymmetric Information
93
0
0.0
(
0
)
Added by
Le Cong Dinh
Publication date
2020
fields
Informatics Engineering
and research's language is
English
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
This paper considers repeated games in which one player has more information about the game than the other players. In particular, we investigate repeated two-player zero-sum games where only the column player knows the payoff matrix A of the game. Suppose that while repeatedly playing this game, the row player chooses her strategy at each round by using a no-regret algorithm to minimize her (pseudo) regret. We develop a no-instant-regret algorithm for the column player to exhibit last round convergence to a minimax equilibrium. We show that our algorithm is efficient against a large set of popular no-regret algorithms of the row player, including the multiplicative weight update algorithm, the online mirror descent method/follow-the-regularized-leader, the linear multiplicative weight update algorithm, and the optimistic multiplicative weight update.
rate research
Read More
This paper examines the convergence of no-regret learning in Cournot games with continuous actions. Cournot games are the essential model for many socio-economic systems, where players compete by strategically setting their output quantity. We assume that players do not have full information of the game and thus cannot pre-compute a Nash equilibrium. Two types of feedback are considered: one is bandit feedback and the other is gradient feedback. To study the convergence of the induced sequence of play, we introduce the notion of convergence in measure, and show that the players actual sequence of action converges to the unique Nash equilibrium. In addition, our results naturally extend the no-regret learning algorithms time-average regret bounds to obtain the final-iteration convergence rates. Together, our work presents significantly sharper convergence results for learning in games without strong assumptions on game property (e.g., monotonicity) and shows how exploiting the game information feedback can influence the convergence rates.
We consider an information elicitation game where the center needs the agent to self-report her actual usage of a service and charges her a payment accordingly. The center can only observe a partial signal, representing part of the agents true consumption, that is generated randomly from a publicly known distribution. The agent can report any information, as long as it does not contradict the signal, and the center issues a payment based on the reported information. Such problems find application in prosumer pricing, tax filing, etc., when the agents actual consumption of a service is masked from the center and verification of the submitted reports is impractical. The key difference between the current problem and classic information elicitation problems is that the agent gets to observe the full signal and act strategically, but the center can only see the partial signal. For this seemingly impossible problem, we propose a penalty mechanism that elicits truthful self-reports in a repeated game. In particular, besides charging the agent the reported value, the mechanism charges a penalty proportional to her inconsistent reports. We show how a combination of the penalty rate and the length of the game incentivizes the agent to be truthful for the entire game, a phenomenon we call fear of tomorrow verification. We show how approximate results for arbitrary distributions can be obtained by analyzing Bernoulli distributions. We extend our mechanism to a multi-agent cost sharing setting and give equilibrium results.
Counterfactual Regret Minimization (CFR) is an efficient no-regret learning algorithm for decision problems modeled as extensive games. CFRs regret bounds depend on the requirement of perfect recall: players always remember information that was revealed to them and the order in which it was revealed. In games without perfect recall, however, CFRs guarantees do not apply. In this paper, we present the first regret bound for CFR when applied to a general class of games with imperfect recall. In addition, we show that CFR applied to any abstraction belonging to our general class results in a regret bound not just for the abstract game, but for the full game as well. We verify our theory and show how imperfect recall can be used to trade a small increase in regret for a significant reduction in memory in three domains: die-roll poker, phantom tic-tac-toe, and Bluff.
We consider an example of stochastic games with partial, asymmetric and non-classical information. We obtain relevant equilibrium policies using a new approach which allows managing the belief updates in a structured manner. Agents have access only to partial information updates, and our approach is to consider optimal open loop control until the information update. The agents continuously control the rates of their Poisson search clocks to acquire the locks, the agent to get all the locks before others would get reward one. However, the agents have no information about the acquisition status of others and will incur a cost proportional to their rate process. We solved the problem for the case with two agents and two locks and conjectured the results for $N$-agents. We showed that a pair of (partial) state-dependent time-threshold policies form a Nash equilibrium.
The notion of emph{policy regret} in online learning is a well defined? performance measure for the common scenario of adaptive adversaries, which more traditional quantities such as external regret do not take into account. We revisit the notion of policy regret and first show that there are online learning settings in which policy regret and external regret are incompatible: any sequence of play that achieves a favorable regret with respect to one definition must do poorly with respect to the other. We then focus on the game-theoretic setting where the adversary is a self-interested agent. In that setting, we show that external regret and policy regret are not in conflict and, in fact, that a wide class of algorithms can ensure a favorable regret with respect to both definitions, so long as the adversary is also using such an algorithm. We also show that the sequence of play of no-policy regret algorithms converges to a emph{policy equilibrium}, a new notion of equilibrium that we introduce. Relating this back to external regret, we show that coarse correlated equilibria, which no-external regret players converge to, are a strict subset of policy equilibria. Thus, in game-theoretic settings, every sequence of play with no external regret also admits no policy regret, but the converse does not hold.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
