Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userRao-Blackwellization to give Improved Estimates in Multi-List Studies
215
0
0.0
(
0
)
Added by
Kyle Vincent Ph. D
Publication date
2017
fields
Mathematical Statistics
and research's language is
English
Authors
Kyle Vincent
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
Sufficient statistics are derived for the population size and parameters of commonly used closed population mark-recapture models. Rao-Blackwellization details for improving estimators that are not functions of the statistics are presented. As Rao-Blackwellization entails enumerating all sample reorderings consistent with the sufficient statistic, Markov chain Monte Carlo resampling procedures are provided to approximate the computationally intensive estimators. Simulation studies demonstrate that significant improvements can be made with the strategy. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.
rate research
Read More
Rao-Blackwellization is a notion often occurring in the MCMC literature, with possibly different meanings and connections with the original Rao--Blackwell theorem (Rao, 1945 and Blackwell,1947), including a reduction of the variance of the resulting Monte Carlo approximations. This survey reviews some of the meanings of the term.
We investigate a Poisson sampling design in the presence of unknown selection probabilities when applied to a population of unknown size for multiple sampling occasions. The fixed-population model is adopted and extended upon for inference. The complete minimal sufficient statistic is derived for the sampling model parameters and fixed-population parameter vector. The Rao-Blackwell version of population quantity estimators is detailed. An application is applied to an emprical population. The extended inferential framework is found to have much potential and utility for empirical studies.
In microbiome studies, one of the ways of studying bacterial abundances is to estimate bacterial composition based on the sequencing read counts. Various transformations are then applied to such compositional data for downstream statistical analysis, among which the centered log-ratio (clr) transformation is most commonly used. Due to limited sequencing depth and DNA dropouts, many rare bacterial taxa might not be captured in the final sequencing reads, which results in many zero counts. Naive composition estimation using count normalization leads to many zero proportions, which makes clr transformation infeasible. This paper proposes a multi-sample approach to estimation of the clr matrix directly in order to borrow information across samples and across species. Empirical results from real datasets suggest that the clr matrix over multiple samples is approximately low rank, which motivates a regularized maximum likelihood estimation with a nuclear norm penalty. An efficient optimization algorithm using the generalized accelerated proximal gradient is developed. Theoretical upper bounds of the estimation errors and of its corresponding singular subspace errors are established. Simulation studies demonstrate that the proposed estimator outperforms the naive estimators. The method is analyzed on Gut Microbiome dataset and the American Gut project.
When drawing causal inference from observational data, there is always concern about unmeasured confounding. One way to tackle this is to conduct a sensitivity analysis. One widely-used sensitivity analysis framework hypothesizes the existence of a scalar unmeasured confounder U and asks how the causal conclusion would change were U measured and included in the primary analysis. Works along this line often make various parametric assumptions on U, for the sake of mathematical and computational simplicity. In this article, we substantively further this line of research by developing a valid sensitivity analysis that leaves the distribution of U unrestricted. Our semiparametric estimator has three desirable features compared to many existing methods in the literature. First, our method allows for a larger and more flexible family of models, and mitigates observable implications (Franks et al., 2019). Second, our methods work seamlessly with any primary analysis that models the outcome regression parametrically. Third, our method is easy to use and interpret. We construct both pointwise confidence intervals and confidence bands that are uniformly valid over a given sensitivity parameter space, thus formally accounting for unknown sensitivity parameters. We apply our proposed method on an influential yet controversial study of the causal relationship between war experiences and political activeness using observational data from Uganda.
We propose a method to test for the presence of differential ascertainment in case-control studies, when data are collected by multiple sources. We show that, when differential ascertainment is present, the use of only the observed cases leads to severe bias in the computation of the odds ratio. We can alleviate the effect of such bias using the estimates that our method of testing for differential ascertainment naturally provides. We apply it to a dataset obtained from the National Violent Death Reporting System, with the goal of checking for the presence of differential ascertainment by race in the count of deaths caused by child maltreatment.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
