Do you want to publish a course? Click here

Solar wind magnetic field background spectrum from fluid to kinetic scales

100   0   0.0 ( 0 )
 Added by Roberto Bruno
 Publication date 2017
  fields Physics
and research's language is English
 Authors R. Bruno




Ask ChatGPT about the research

The solar wind is highly structured in fast and slow flows. These two dynamical regimes remarkably differ not only for the average values of magnetic field and plasma parameters but also for the type of fluctuations they transport. Fast wind is characterized by large amplitude, incompressible fluctuations, mainly Alfv{e}nic, slow wind is generally populated by smaller amplitude and less Alfv{e}nic fluctuations, mainly compressive. The typical corotating fast stream is characterized by a stream interface, a fast wind region and a slower rarefaction region formed by the trailing expansion edge of the stream. Moving {between these two regions}, from faster to slower wind, we observe the following behavior: a) the power level of magnetic fluctuations within the inertial range largely decreases, keeping the typical Kolmogorov scaling; b) at proton scales, for about one decade right beyond the high frequency break, the spectral index becomes flatter and flatter towards a value around -2.7; c) at higher frequencies, before the electron scales, the spectral index remains around -2.7 and, {based on suitable observations available for $4$ corotating streams}, the power level does not change, irrespective of the flow speed. All these spectral features, characteristic of high speed streams, suggest the existence of a sort of magnetic field background spectrum. This spectrum would be common to both faster and slower wind but, any time the observer would cross the inner part of a fluxtube channeling the faster wind into the interplanetary space, a turbulent and large amplitude Alfv{e}nic spectrum would be superposed to it.



rate research

Read More

Turbulent spectra of magnetic fluctuations in the free solar wind are studied from MHD to electron scales using Cluster observations. We discuss the problem of the instrumental noise and its influence on the measurements at the electron scales. We confirm the presence of a curvature of the spectrum $sim exp{sqrt{krho_e}}$ over the broad frequency range $sim[10,100]$ Hz, indicating the presence of a dissipation. Analysis of seven spectra under different plasma conditions show clearly the presence of a quasi-universal power-law spectrum at MHD and ion scales. However, the transition from the inertial range $sim k^{-1.7}$ to the spectrum at ion scales $sim k^{-2.7}$ is not universal. Finally, we discuss the role of different kinetic plasma scales on the spectral shape, considering normalized dimensionless spectra.
An exospheric kinetic solar wind model is interfaced with an observation-driven single fluid magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) model. Initially, a photospheric magnetogram serves as observational input in the fluid approach to extrapolate the heliospheric magnetic field. Then semi-empirical coronal models are used for estimating the plasma characteristics up to a heliocentric distance of 0.1AU. From there on a full MHD model which computes the three-dimensional time-dependent evolution of the solar wind macroscopic variables up to the orbit of the Earth is used. After interfacing the density and velocity at the inner MHD boundary, we compare with the results of a kinetic exospheric solar wind model based on the assumption of Maxwell and Kappa velocity distribution functions for protons and electrons respectively, as well as with textit{in situ} observations at 1AU. This provides insight on more physically detailed processes, such as coronal heating and solar wind acceleration, that naturally arise by inclusion of suprathermal electrons in the model. We are interested in the profile of the solar wind speed and density at 1AU, in characterizing the slow and fast source regions of the wind and in comparing MHD with exospheric models in similar conditions. We calculate the energetics of both models from low to high heliocentric distances.
Seven-year long seeing-free observations of solar magnetic fields with the Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager (HMI) on board the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO) were used to study the sources of the solar mean magnetic field, SMMF, defined as the net line-of-sight magnetic flux divided over the solar disk area. To evaluate the contribution of different regions to the SMMF, we separated all the pixels of each SDO/HMI magnetogram into three subsets: weak (B_W), intermediate (B_I), and strong (B_S) fields. The B_W component represents areas with magnetic flux densities below the chosen threshold; the B_I component is mainly represented by network fields, remains of decayed active regions (ARs), and ephemeral regions. The B_S component consists of magnetic elements in ARs. To derive the contribution of a subset to the total SMMF, the linear regression coefficients between the corresponding component and the SMMF were calculated. We found that: i) when the threshold level of 30 Mx cm^-2 is applied, the B_I and B_S components together contribute from 65% to 95% of the SMMF, while the fraction of the occupied area varies in a range of 2-6% of the disk area; ii) as the threshold magnitude is lowered to 6 Mx cm^-2, the contribution from B_I+B_S grows to 98%, and the fraction of the occupied area reaches the value of about 40% of the solar disk. In summary, we found that regardless of the threshold level, only a small part of the solar disk area contributes to the SMMF. This means that the photospheric magnetic structure is an intermittent, inherently porous medium, resembling a percolation cluster. These findings suggest that the long-standing concept that continuous vast unipolar areas on the solar surface are the source of the SMMF may need to be reconsidered.
The application of linear kinetic treatments to plasma waves, damping, and instability requires favorable inequalities between the associated linear timescales and timescales for nonlinear (e.g., turbulence) evolution. In the solar wind these two types of timescales may be directly compared using standard Kolmogorov-style analysis and observational data. The estimated local nonlinear magnetohydrodynamic cascade times, evaluated as relevant kinetic scales are approached, remain slower than the cyclotron period, but comparable to, or faster than, the typical timescales of instabilities, anisotropic waves, and wave damping. The variation with length scale of the turbulence timescales is supported by observations and simulations. On this basis the use of linear theory - which assumes constant parameters to calculate the associated kinetic rates - may be questioned. It is suggested that the product of proton gyrofrequency and nonlinear time at the ion gyroscales provides a simple measure of turbulence influence on proton kinetic behavior.
We have studied the relationship between the solar-wind speed $[V]$ and the coronal magnetic-field properties (a flux expansion factor [$f$] and photospheric magnetic-field strength [$B_{mathrm{S}}$]) at all latitudes using data of interplanetary scintillation and solar magnetic field obtained for 24 years from 1986 to 2009. Using a cross-correlation analyses, we verified that $V$ is inversely proportional to $f$ and found that $V$ tends to increase with $B_{mathrm{S}}$ if $f$ is the same. As a consequence, we find that $V$ has extremely good linear correlation with $B_{mathrm{S}}/f$. However, this linear relation of $V$ and $B_{mathrm{S}}/f$ cannot be used for predicting the solar-wind velocity without information on the solar-wind mass flux. We discuss why the inverse relation between $V$ and $f$ has been successfully used for solar-wind velocity prediction, even though it does not explicitly include the mass flux and magnetic-field strength, which are important physical parameters for solar-wind acceleration.
comments
Fetching comments Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
mircosoft-partner

هل ترغب بارسال اشعارات عن اخر التحديثات في شمرا-اكاديميا