Do you want to publish a course? Click here

Decidability of multiset, set and numerically decipherable directed figure codes

291   0   0.0 ( 0 )
 Publication date 2016
and research's language is English




Ask ChatGPT about the research

Codes with various kinds of decipherability, weaker than the usual unique decipherability, have been studied since multiset decipherability was introduced in mid-1980s. We consider decipherability of directed figure codes, where directed figures are defined as labelled polyominoes with designated start and end points, equipped with catenation operation that may use a merging function to resolve possible conflicts. This is one of possible extensions generalizing words and variable-length codes to planar structures. Here, verification whether a given set is a code is no longer decidable in general. We study the decidability status of figure codes depending on catenation type (with or without a merging function), decipherability kind (unique, multiset, set or numeric) and code geometry (several classes determined by relative positions of start and end points of figures). We give decidability or undecidability proofs in all but two cases that remain open.



rate research

Read More

We prove that the genus of a regular language is decidable. For this purpose, we use a graph-theoretical approach. We show that the original question is equivalent to the existence of a special kind of graph epimorphism - a directed emulator morphism -- onto the underlying graph of the minimal deterministic automaton for the regular language. We also prove that the class of directed emulators of genus less than or equal to $g$ is closed under minors. Decidability follows from the Robertson-Seymour theorem.
156 - Chao Wang , Gustavo Petri , Yi Lv 2021
An important property of concurrent objects is whether they support progress -a special case of liveness-guarantees, which ensure the termination of individual method calls under system fairness assumptions. Liveness properties have been proposed for concurrent objects. Typical liveness properties includelock-freedom,wait-freedom,deadlock-freedom,starvation-freedom and obstruction-freedom. It is known that the five liveness properties above are decidable on the Sequential Consistency (SC) memory model for a bounded number of processes. However, the problem of decidability of liveness for finite state concurrent programs running on relaxed memory models remains open. In this paper we address this problem for the Total Store Order (TSO) memory model,as found in the x86 architecture. We prove that lock-freedom, wait-freedom,deadlock-freedom and starvation-freedom are undecidable on TSO for a bounded number of processes, while obstruction-freedom is decidable.
We study the problems of finding a shortest synchronizing word and its length for a given prefix code. This is done in two different settings: when the code is defined by an arbitrary decoder recognizing its star and when the code is defined by its literal decoder (whose size is polynomially equivalent to the total length of all words in the code). For the first case for every $varepsilon > 0$ we prove $n^{1 - varepsilon}$-inapproximability for recognizable binary maximal prefix codes, $Theta(log n)$-inapproximability for finite binary maximal prefix codes and $n^{frac{1}{2} - varepsilon}$-inapproximability for finite binary prefix codes. By $c$-inapproximability here we mean the non-existence of a $c$-approximation polynomial time algorithm under the assumption P $ e$ NP, and by $n$ the number of states of the decoder in the input. For the second case, we propose approximation and exact algorithms and conjecture that for finite maximal prefix codes the problem can be solved in polynomial time. We also study the related problems of finding a shortest mortal and a shortest avoiding word.
166 - Olivier Finkel 2011
We prove that some fairly basic questions on automata reading infinite words depend on the models of the axiomatic system ZFC. It is known that there are only three possibilities for the cardinality of the complement of an omega-language $L(A)$ accepted by a Buchi 1-counter automaton $A$. We prove the following surprising result: there exists a 1-counter Buchi automaton $A$ such that the cardinality of the complement $L(A)^-$ of the omega-language $L(A)$ is not determined by ZFC: (1). There is a model $V_1$ of ZFC in which $L(A)^-$ is countable. (2). There is a model $V_2$ of ZFC in which $L(A)^-$ has cardinal $2^{aleph_0}$. (3). There is a model $V_3$ of ZFC in which $L(A)^-$ has cardinal $aleph_1$ with $aleph_0<aleph_1<2^{aleph_0}$. We prove a very similar result for the complement of an infinitary rational relation accepted by a 2-tape Buchi automaton $B$. As a corollary, this proves that the Continuum Hypothesis may be not satisfied for complements of 1-counter omega-languages and for complements of infinitary rational relations accepted by 2-tape Buchi automata. We infer from the proof of the above results that basic decision problems about 1-counter omega-languages or infinitary rational relations are actually located at the third level of the analytical hierarchy. In particular, the problem to determine whether the complement of a 1-counter omega-language (respectively, infinitary rational relation) is countable is in $Sigma_3^1 setminus (Pi_2^1 cup Sigma_2^1)$. This is rather surprising if compared to the fact that it is decidable whether an infinitary rational relation is countable (respectively, uncountable).
We study a family of generalizations of Edge Dominating Set on directed graphs called Directed $(p,q)$-Edge Dominating Set. In this problem an arc $(u,v)$ is said to dominate itself, as well as all arcs which are at distance at most $q$ from $v$, or at distance at most $p$ to $u$. First, we give significantly improved FPT algorithms for the two most important cases of the problem, $(0,1)$-dEDS and $(1,1)$-dEDS (that correspond
comments
Fetching comments Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
mircosoft-partner

هل ترغب بارسال اشعارات عن اخر التحديثات في شمرا-اكاديميا