Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userHellinger volume and number-on-the-forehead communication complexity
215
0
0.0
(
0
)
Added by
Nikos Leonardos
Publication date
2014
fields
Informatics Engineering
and research's language is
English
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
Information-theoretic methods have proven to be a very powerful tool in communication complexity, in particular giving an elegant proof of the linear lower bound for the two-party disjointness function, and tight lower bounds on disjointness in the multi-party number-in-the-hand (NIH) model. In this paper, we study the applicability of information theoretic methods to the multi-party number-on-the-forehead model (NOF), where determining the complexity of disjointness remains an important open problem. There are two basic parts to the NIH disjointness lower bound: a direct sum theorem and a lower bound on the one-bit AND function using a beautiful connection between Hellinger distance and protocols revealed by Bar-Yossef, Jayram, Kumar and Sivakumar [BYJKS04]. Inspired by this connection, we introduce the notion of Hellinger volume. We show that it lower bounds the information cost of multi-party NOF protocols and provide a small toolbox that allows one to manipulate several Hellinger volume terms and lower bound a Hellinger volume when the distributions involved satisfy certain conditions. In doing so, we prove a new upper bound on the difference between the arithmetic mean and the geometric mean in terms of relative entropy. We then apply these new tools to obtain a lower bound on the informational complexity of the AND_k function in the NOF setting. Finally, we discuss the difficulties of proving a direct sum theorem for information cost in the NOF model.
rate research
Read More
Two parties wish to carry out certain distributed computational tasks, and they are given access to a source of correlated random bits. It allows the parties to act in a correlated manner, which can be quite useful. But what happens if the shared randomness is not perfect? In this work, we initiate the study of the power of different sources of shared randomness in communication complexity. This is done in the setting of simultaneous message passing (SMP) model of communication complexity, which is one of the most suitable models for studying the resource of shared randomness. Toward characterising the power of various sources of shared randomness, we introduce a measure for the quality of a source - we call it collision complexity. Our results show that the collision complexity tightly characterises the power of a (shared) randomness resource in the SMP model. Of independent interest is our demonstration that even the weakest sources of shared randomness can in some cases increase the power of SMP substantially: the equality function can be solved very efficiently with virtually any nontrivial shared randomness.
We show that disjointness requires randomized communication Omega(n^{1/(k+1)}/2^{2^k}) in the general k-party number-on-the-forehead model of complexity. The previous best lower bound for k >= 3 was log(n)/(k-1). Our results give a separation between nondeterministic and randomized multiparty number-on-the-forehead communication complexity for up to k=log log n - O(log log log n) many players. Also by a reduction of Beame, Pitassi, and Segerlind, these results imply subexponential lower bounds on the size of proofs needed to refute certain unsatisfiable CNFs in a broad class of proof systems, including tree-like Lovasz-Schrijver proofs.
We describe algorithmic Number On the Forehead protocols that provide dense Ruzsa-Szemer{e}di graphs. One protocol leads to a simple and natural extension of the original construction of Ruzsa and Szemer{e}di. The graphs induced by this protocol have $n$ vertices, $Omega(n^2/log n)$ edges, and are decomposable into $n^{1+O(1/log log n)}$ induced matchings. Another protocol is an explicit (and slightly simpler) version of the construction of Alon, Moitra and Sudakov, producing graphs with similar properties. We also generalize the above protocols to more than three players, in order to construct dense uniform hypergraphs in which every edge lies in a positive small number of simplices.
Help bits are some limited trusted information about an instance or instances of a computational problem that may reduce the computational complexity of solving that instance or instances. In this paper, we study the value of help bits in the settings of randomized and average-case complexity. Amir, Beigel, and Gasarch (1990) show that for constant $k$, if $k$ instances of a decision problem can be efficiently solved using less than $k$ bits of help, then the problem is in P/poly. We extend this result to the setting of randomized computation: We show that the decision problem is in P/poly if using $ell$ help bits, $k$ instances of the problem can be efficiently solved with probability greater than $2^{ell-k}$. The same result holds if using less than $k(1 - h(alpha))$ help bits (where $h(cdot)$ is the binary entropy function), we can efficiently solve $(1-alpha)$ fraction of the instances correctly with non-vanishing probability. We also extend these two results to non-constant but logarithmic $k$. In this case however, instead of showing that the problem is in P/poly we show that it satisfies $k$-membership comparability, a notion known to be related to solving $k$ instances using less than $k$ bits of help. Next we consider the setting of average-case complexity: Assume that we can solve $k$ instances of a decision problem using some help bits whose entropy is less than $k$ when the $k$ instances are drawn independently from a particular distribution. Then we can efficiently solve an instance drawn from that distribution with probability better than $1/2$. Finally, we show that in the case where $k$ is super-logarithmic, assuming $k$-membership comparability of a decision problem, one cannot prove that the problem is in P/poly by a black-box proof.
Three decades of research in communication complexity have led to the invention of a number of techniques to lower bound randomized communication complexity. The majority of these techniques involve properties of large submatrices (rectangles) of the truth-table matrix defining a communication problem. The only technique that does not quite fit is information complexity, which has been investigated over the last decade. Here, we connect information complexity to one of the most powerful rectangular techniques: the recently-introduced smooth corruption (or smooth rectangle) bound. We show that the former subsumes the latter under rectangular input distributions. We conjecture that this subsumption holds more generally, under arbitrary distributions, which would resolve the long-standing direct sum question for randomized communication. As an application, we obtain an optimal $Omega(n)$ lower bound on the information complexity---under the {em uniform distribution}---of the so-called orthogonality problem (ORT), which is in turn closely related to the much-studied Gap-Hamming-Distance (GHD). The proof of this bound is along the lines of recent communication lower bounds for GHD, but we encounter a surprising amount of additional technical detail.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
