Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userOn the determination of curvature and dynamical Dark Energy
140
0
0.0
(
0
)
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
Constraining simultaneously the Dark Energy(DE) equation of state and the curvature of the Universe is difficult due to strong degeneracies. To circumvent this problem when analyzing data it is usual to assume flatness to constrain DE, or conversely, to assume that DE is a cosmological constant to constrain curvature. In this paper, we quantify the impact of such assumptions in view of future large surveys. We simulate future data for type Ia Supernovae (SNIa), Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) and Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAO) for a large range of fiducial cosmologies allowing a small spatial curvature. We take into account a possible time evolution of DE through a parameterized equation of state : $w(a) = w_0 + (1-a) w_a$. We then fit the simulated data with a wrong assumption on the curvature or on the DE parameters. For a fiducial $Lambda$CDM cosmology, if flatness is incorrectly assumed in the fit and if the true curvature is within the ranges $0.01<Omega_k<0.03$ and $-0.07<Omega_k<-0.01$, one will conclude erroneously to the presence of an evolving DE, even with high statistics. On the other hand, models with curvature and dynamical DE can be confused with a flat $Lambda$CDM model when the fit ignores a possible DE evolution. We find that, in the future, with high statistics, such risks of confusion should be limited, but they are still possible, and biases on the cosmological parameters might be important. We conclude on recalling that, in the future, it will be mandatory to perform some complete multi-probes analyses, leaving the DE parameters as well as the curvature as free parameters.
rate research
Read More
We investigate how the nature of dark energy affects the determination of the curvature of the universe from recent observations. For this purpose, we consider the constraints on the matter and dark energy density using observations of type Ia supernovae, baryon acoustic oscillation peak and cosmic microwave background with several types of dark energy equation of state. Although it is usually said that the combination of current observations favors a flat universe, we found that a relatively large parameter space allows the universe to be open for a particular model of dark energy. We also discuss what kind of dark energy model or prior allow a non-flat universe.
We present limits on the parameters of the o$Lambda$CDM, $w_0$CDM, and $w_0 w_a$CDM models obtained from the joint analysis of the full-shape, baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO), big bang nucleosynthesis (BBN) and supernovae data. Our limits are fully independent of the data on the cosmic microwave background (CMB) anisotropies, but rival the CMB constraints in terms of parameter error bars. We find the spatial curvature consistent with a flat universe $Omega_k=-0.043_{-0.036}^{+0.036}$ ($68%$ C.L.); the dark-energy equation of state parameter $w_0$ is measured to be $w_0=-1.031_{-0.048}^{+0.052}$ ($68%$ C.L.), consistent with a cosmological constant. This conclusion also holds for the time-varying dark energy equation of state, for which we find $w_0=-0.98_{-0.11}^{+0.099}$ and $w_a=-0.33_{-0.48}^{+0.63}$ (both at $68%$ C.L.). The exclusion of the supernovae data from the analysis does not significantly weaken our bounds. This shows that using a single external BBN prior, the full-shape and BAO data can provide strong CMB-independent constraints on the non-minimal cosmological models.
In this work, we first discuss the possibility that dark energy models with negative energy density values in the past can alleviate the $H_0$ tension, as well as the discrepancy with the baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) Lyman-$alpha$ data, both which prevail within the $Lambda$CDM model. We then investigate whether two minimal extensions of the $Lambda$CDM model, together or separately, can successfully realize such a scenario: (i) the spatial curvature, which, in the case of spatially closed universe, mimics a negative density source and (ii) simple-graduated dark energy (gDE), which promotes the null inertial mass density of the usual vacuum energy to an arbitrary constant--if negative, the corresponding energy density decreases with redshift similar to the phantom models, but unlike them crosses below zero at a certain redshift. We find that, when the Planck data are not included in the observational analysis, the models with simple-gDE predict interesting and some significant deviations from the $Lambda$CDM model. In particular, a spatially closed universe along with a simple-gDE of positive inertial mass density, which work in contrast to each other, results in minor improvement to the $H_0$ tension. The joint dataset, including the Planck data, presents no evidence for a deviation from spatial flatness but almost the same evidence for a cosmological constant and the simple-gDE with an inertial mass density of order $mathcal{O}(10^{-12}),rm eV^4$. The latter case predicts almost no deviation from the $Lambda$CDM model up until today--so that it results in no improvement regarding the BAO Ly-$alpha$ data--except that it slightly aggravates the $H_0$ tension. We also study via dynamical analysis the history of the Universe in the models, as the simple-gDE results in futures different than the de Sitter future of the $Lambda$CDM model.
We use the Constitution supernova, the baryon acoustic oscillation, the cosmic microwave background, and the Hubble parameter data to analyze the evolution property of dark energy. We obtain different results when we fit different baryon acoustic oscillation data combined with the Constitution supernova data to the Chevallier-Polarski-Linder model. We find that the difference stems from the different values of $Omega_{m0}$. We also fit the observational data to the model independent piecewise constant parametrization. Four redshift bins with boundaries at $z=0.22$, 0.53, 0.85 and 1.8 were chosen for the piecewise constant parametrization of the equation of state parameter $w(z)$ of dark energy. We find no significant evidence for evolving $w(z)$. With the addition of the Hubble parameter, the constraint on the equation of state parameter at high redshift isimproved by 70%. The marginalization of the nuisance parameter connected to the supernova distance modulus is discussed.
Upcoming Weak Lensing (WL) surveys can be used to constrain Dark Energy (DE) properties, namely if tomographic techniques are used to improve their sensitivity. In this work, we use a Fisher matrix technique to compare the power of CMB anisotropy and polarization data with tomographic WL data, in constraining DE parameters. Adding WL data to available CMB data improves the detection of all cosmological parameters, but the impact is really strong when DE--DM coupling is considered, as WL tomography can then succeed to reduce the errors on some parameters by factors >10.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
