Comparison the treatment between lateral pins and medial and lateral (crossed) pins for fixation of displaced supracondylar fractures of humerus in children after closed reduction
published by Aِl-Baath University
in 2016
in
and research's language is
العربية
Download
Abstract in English
Closed reduction and percutaneous pin fixation is considered
standard management for displaced supracondylar fractures of the
humerus in children. However, controversy exists regarding whether
to use pins from the lateral side or medial and lateral side of the
elbow for fixation .
We performed this research to know the results of two ways of
treatment and to compare : 1- the risk of iatrogenic ulnar nerve
injury caused by pin fixation . 2- quality of fracture reduction in
terms of radiographic outcomes . 3- compare function of the elbow
and other surgical complications caused by pin fixation between two
ways.
References used
ABRAHAM E, GORDON A, ABDUL-HADI O,2005-: Management of supracondylar fractures of humerus with condylar involvement in children. J Pediatr Orthop, New York, 3. 75-101
AITKEN AP , SMITH L , BLACKETT CW,2007- Supracondylar fractures in children. Am J Surg, Northern Ireland, 5.27-35
ALBURGER PD,WEIDNER PL,1992- Supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. J Pediatr Orthop, North Carolina, 6.103- 151