The Multiharmony Concept For The Cephalometric Evaluation Of Craniofacial Patterns


Abstract in English

All the analysis of craniofacialpatterns is essential since a considerable amountof dental compensation can mask the severity of a malocclusion. Disagreement prevails over the standards that should be used to judge the individual values.In this study, a method is presented—the multiharmony method [MHM], which assists in treatment planning.The approach was applied to a data set of 75 Syrian adults [35 males and 40 females, mean age 23 years] that had not received orthodontic treatment. They were selected frompatients enrolled at Tishreen University Dental colleage, Lattakia, Syria. The subjects had an ideal or near-ideal occlusion [Class I molar relationship, not more than 4 mm overbite and overjet, and no missing teeth] and a well-balanced face.With multiple regression analysis, the expected value that each angle should take in a norm individual when the remaining angles are given is estimated. The residual difference between the measured angle and its expected value then indicates the deviation from a harmonic appearance in the respective angle. The MHM can serves as a supportive tool for the orthodontic expert in the diagnosiss and decision for potential treatment.

References used

SCHWARZ R. Cephalometric methods and orthodontics. International Journal of Orthodontia, Oral Surgery and Radiography 12: 1926, 1078–1102
STEINER, C. C, Cephalometrics for you and me. American Journal of Orthodontics 39: 1953, 729–755
STEINER, C. C, Cephalometrics in clinical practice. Angle Orthodontist 29: 1959, 8–29

Download