The subject of this research is a controversial subject between researchers and practitioners in the field of arbitration. They argue how to ensure the implementation of arbitral tribunals judgments, how to make it at the same level of importance as a judicial rulings and how enrich it with the force of the inevitable matter. Law and Finance and Economy specialist suffer from the previous obstacles in spite of they know the use of arbitration as a preferred method to solve the disputes. So we try in this research to highlight how to protect the arbitral decision through improving the performance reaching to a decision which couldn't be exposed to serious errors. Thus research in the development of the existing legislation and the international agreements trying to achieve the goal of giving the arbitral decision power of self-force equivalent to force of the inevitable matter. Which by the end, it will minimize the effort and the time. Our studies have included a comparison between the two terms which included the title, relying on Syrian evidence Act, Syrian arbitration Law and views of some scholars and jurists seeking to create a satisfaction to implement a valiant steps in this area mindful of the limits of national sovereignty and the rules of public order which it is considered as constants.