A General Framework for Design Courses: Experimentation towards a Comprehensive Architectural Curriculum
published by Damascus University
in 2014
in Civil Engineering
and research's language is
العربية
Download
Abstract in English
Different teaching methods make students’ educational experience hard and even frustrating. This article
suggests a framework for architectural design courses that aims to provide a general road map according
to which information is addressed in parallel with theoretical information gained from other courses. It is
based on the three main issues of architectural design as defined by Vitruvius; namely, function,
structure, and form. Two other issues are also addressed: the social and the environmental side. The
framework was applied for two semesters at the International University for Science and Technology in
Damascus; open juries were also used for the first time. Results obtained from questionnaires and
interviews indicate acceptance of the proposed framework and the idea of open juries by faculty and
students. However, the application of the framework requires longer time to be fully and seriously
accepted and then adopted by faculty. Students were enthusiastic about the open jury.
References used
Forsyth, G., et al. (2007). National Forum on Studio Teaching. Australia: University of New South Wales
Kuhn, S. (2001). Learning from the Architecture Studio: Implications for Project-Based Pedagogy. International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 17, no. 4 -5, pp. 349-352
La Harpe, B., et al. (2009). Assessment Focus in Studio: What is Most Prominent in Architecture, Art, and Design? International Journal of Art & Design Education, Volume 28, Number 1, February 2009, pp. 37-51
Ostwald, M., et. al. (2008). Understanding Architectural Education in Australia, volume 2. Australia: Australian Learning and Teaching Council
Salama, A. (1995). New Trends in Architectural Education: Designing the Design Studio. Raleigh, NC: Tailored Text and Unlimited Potential Publishing