Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userTime Scales in Evolutionary Dynamics
160
0
0.0
(
0
)
Added by
Angel (Anxo) Sanchez
Publication date
2006
fields
Biology
and research's language is
English
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
Evolutionary game theory has traditionally assumed that all individuals in a population interact with each other between reproduction events. We show that eliminating this restriction by explicitly considering the time scales of interaction and selection leads to dramatic changes in the outcome of evolution. Examples include the selection of the inefficient strategy in the Harmony and Stag-Hunt games, and the disappearance of the coexistence state in the Snowdrift game. Our results hold for any population size and in the presence of a background of fitness.
rate research
Read More
Animals use a wide variety of strategies to reduce or avoid aggression in conflicts over resources. These strategies range from sharing resources without outward signs of conflict to the development of dominance hierarchies, in which initial fighting is followed by the submission of subordinates. Although models have been developed to analyze specific strategies for resolving conflicts over resources, little work has focused on trying to understand why particular strategies are more likely to arise in certain situations. In this paper, we use a model based on an iterated Hawk--Dove game to analyze how resource holding potentials (RHPs) and other factors affect whether sharing, dominance relationships, or other behaviours are evolutionarily stable. We find through extensive numerical simulations that sharing is stable only when the cost of fighting is low and the animals in a contest have similar RHPs, whereas dominance relationships are stable in most other situations. We also explore what happens when animals are unable to assess each others RHPs without fighting, and we compare a range of strategies for this problem using simulations. We find (1) that the most successful strategies involve a limited period of assessment followed by a stable relationship in which fights are avoided and (2) that the duration of assessment depends both on the costliness of fighting and on the difference between the animals RHPs. Along with our direct work on modeling and simulations, we develop extensive software to facilitate further testing; it is available at url{https://bitbucket.org/CameronLHall/dominancesharingassessmentmatlab/}.
Darwinian evolution can be modeled in general terms as a flow in the space of fitness (i.e. reproductive rate) distributions. In the diffusion approximation, Tsimring et al. have showed that this flow admits fitness wave solutions: Gaussian-shape fitness distributions moving towards higher fitness values at constant speed. Here we show more generally that evolving fitness distributions are attracted to a one-parameter family of distributions with a fixed parabolic relationship between skewness and kurtosis. Unlike fitness waves, this statistical pattern encompasses both positive and negative (a.k.a. purifying) selection and is not restricted to rapidly adapting populations. Moreover we find that the mean fitness of a population under the selection of pre-existing variation is a power-law function of time, as observed in microbiological evolution experiments but at variance with fitness wave theory. At the conceptual level, our results can be viewed as the resolution of the dynamic insufficiency of Fishers fundamental theorem of natural selection. Our predictions are in good agreement with numerical simulations.
Biodiversity and extinction are central issues in evolution. Dynamical balance among different species in ecosystems is often described by deterministic replicator equations with moderate success. However, fluctuations are inevitable, either caused by external environment or intrinsic random competitions in finite populations, and the evolutionary dynamics is stochastic in nature. Here we show that, after appropriate coarse-graining, random fluctuations generate dissipation towards extinction because the evolution trajectories in the phase space of all competing species possess positive curvature. As a demonstrating example, we compare the fluctuation-induced dissipative dynamics in Lotka-Volterra model with numerical simulations and find impressive agreement. Our finding is closely related to the fluctuation-dissipation theorem in statistical mechanics but the marked difference is the non-equilibrium essence of the generic evolutionary dynamics. As the evolving ecosystems are far from equilibrium, the relation between fluctuations and dissipations is often complicated and dependent on microscopic details. It is thus remarkable that the generic positivity of the trajectory curvature warrants dissipation arisen from the seemingly harmless fluctuations. The unexpected dissipative dynamics is beyond the reach of conventional replicator equations and plays a crucial role in investigating the biodiversity in ecosystems.
Temporal environmental variations are ubiquitous in nature, yet most of the theoretical works in population genetics and evolution assume fixed environment. Here we analyze the effect of variations in carrying capacity on the fate of a mutant type. We consider a two-state Moran model, where selection intensity at equilibrium may differ (in amplitude and in sign) from selection during periods of sharp growth and sharp decline. Using Kimuras diffusion approximation we present simple formulae for effective population size and effective selection, and use it to calculate the chance of ultimate fixation, the time to fixation and the time to absorption (either fixation or loss). Our analysis shows perfect agreement with numerical solutions for neutral, beneficial and deleterious mutant. The contributions of different processes to the mean and the variance of abundance variations are additive and commutative. As a result, when selection intensity $s$ is weak such that ${cal O}(s^2)$ terms are negligible, periodic or stochastic environmental variations yield identical results.
The incubation period of a disease is the time between an initiating pathologic event and the onset of symptoms. For typhoid fever, polio, measles, leukemia and many other diseases, the incubation period is highly variable. Some affected people take much longer than average to show symptoms, leading to a distribution of incubation periods that is right skewed and often approximately lognormal. Although this statistical pattern was discovered more than sixty years ago, it remains an open question to explain its ubiquity. Here we propose an explanation based on evolutionary dynamics on graphs. For simple models of a mutant or pathogen invading a network-structured population of healthy cells, we show that skewed distributions of incubation periods emerge for a wide range of assumptions about invader fitness, competition dynamics, and network structure. The skewness stems from stochastic mechanisms associated with two classic problems in probability theory: the coupon collector and the random walk. Unlike previous explanations that rely crucially on heterogeneity, our results hold even for homogeneous populations. Thus, we predict that two equally healthy individuals subjected to equal doses of equally pathogenic agents may, by chance alone, show remarkably different time courses of disease.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
