Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userQCD Explorer Proposal: E-Linac Versus E-Ring
91
0
0.0
(
0
)
Authors
H. Karadeniz
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
TeV center of mass energy lepton-hadron collider is necessary both to clarify fundamental aspects of strong interactions and for adequate interpretation of the LHC data. Recently proposed QCD Explorer utilizes the energy advantage of the LHC proton and ion beams, which allows the usage of relatively low energy electron beam. Two options for the LHC based ep collider are posibble: construction of a new electron ring in the LHC tunnel or construction of an e-linac tangentially to the LHC. In the latter case, which seems more acceptable for a number of reasons, two options are under consideration for electron linac: the CLIC technology allows shorter linac length, whereas TESLA technology gives higher luminosity.
rate research
Read More
The relative center-of-mass energy spread at $e^+e^-$ colliders is about $10^{-3}$, which is much larger than the widths of narrow resonances produced in the s-channel in $e^+e^-$ collisions. This circumstance greatly lowers the resonance production rates of J/Psi, Upsilon(1S), Upsilon(2S), Upsilon(3S) and makes it extremely difficult to observe resonance production of the Higgs boson. Thus, a significant reduction of the center-of-mass energy spread would open up great opportunities in the search for new physics in rare decays of narrow resonances, the search for new narrow states with small $Gamma_{e^+e^-}$, the study of true muonium and tauonium, etc. The existing monochromatization scheme is only suitable for head-on collisions, while $e^+e^-$ colliders with crossing angles (the so-called Crab Waist collision scheme) can provide significantly higher luminosity due to reduced collision effects. In this paper, we propose a new monochromatization method for colliders with a large crossing angle. The contribution of the beam energy spread to the spread of the center-of-mass energy is canceled by introducing an appropriate energy-angle correlation at the interaction point; $sigma_W/W sim (3-5)10^{-6}$ appears possible. Limitations of the proposed method are also considered.
204 -
V.I. Telnov (Budker Institute of Nuclear physics
, Novosibirsk Staten Univ.
, Novosibirsk
2021
Superconducting niobium cavity technology (used for ILC) makes it possible to build a linear collider with energy recovery (ERLC). To avoid parasitic collisions inside the linacs a twin LC is proposed. In this article, we consider the principle scheme of the collider and its energy consumption, and also estimate the achievable luminosity, which is limited by collision effects. With a duty cycle of 1/3, a luminosity of about $5times 10^{35} ,rm cm^{-2}s^{-1}$ is possible, which is almost two orders of magnitude higher than at the ILC, where the beams are used only once.
The international Future Circular Collider (FCC) study aims at a design of $pp$, $e^+e^-$, $ep$ colliders to be built in a new 100 km tunnel in the Geneva region. The $e^+e^-$ collider (FCC-ee) has a centre of mass energy range between 90 (Z-pole) and 375 GeV (tt_bar). To reach such unprecedented energies and luminosities, the design of the interaction region is crucial. The crab-waist collision scheme has been chosen for the design and it will be compatible with all beam energies. In this paper we will describe the machine detector interface layout including the solenoid compensation scheme. We will describe how this layout fulfills all the requirements set by the parameters table and by the physical constraints. We will summarize the studies of the impact of the synchrotron radiation, the analysis of trapped modes and of the backgrounds induced by single beam and luminosity effects giving an estimate of the losses in the interaction region and in the detector.
A strong candidate for the Standard Model Scalar boson, H(126), has been discovered by the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) experiments. In order to study this fundamental particle with unprecedented precision, and to perform precision tests of the closure of the Standard Model, we investigate the possibilities offered by An e+e- storage ring collider. We use a design inspired by the B-factories, taking into account the performance achieved at LEP2, and imposing a synchrotron radiation power limit of 100 MW. At the most relevant centre-of-mass energy of 240 GeV, near-constant luminosities of 10^34 cm^{-2}s^{-1} are possible in up to four collision points for a ring of 27km circumference. The achievable luminosity increases with the bending radius, and for 80km circumference, a luminosity of 5 10^34 cm^{-2}s^{-1} in four collision points appears feasible. Beamstrahlung becomes relevant at these high luminosities, leading to a design requirement of large momentum acceptance both in the accelerating system and in the optics. The larger machine could reach the top quark threshold, would yield luminosities per interaction point of 10^36 cm^{-2}s^{-1} at the Z pole (91 GeV) and 2 10^35 cm^{-2}s^{-1} at the W pair production threshold (80 GeV per beam). The energy spread is reduced in the larger ring with respect to what is was at LEP, giving confidence that beam polarization for energy calibration purposes should be available up to the W pair threshold. The capabilities in term of physics performance are outlined.
Particle loss due to the emission of single energetic beamstrahlung photons in beam collisions is shown to impose a fundamental limit on storage-ring luminosities at energies greater than 2E~140 GeV for head-on collisions and 2E~40 GeV for crab-waist collisions. Above these threshold energies, the suppression factor due to beamstrahlung scales as 1/E^{4/3}, and for a fixed power of synchrotron radiation, the luminosity L is proportional to R/E^{13/3}, where R is the collider radius. For 2E > 150 GeV, both collision schemes have similar luminosity limits. The luminosities attainable at storage-ring and linear-collider (LC) 2E=240 GeV Higgs factories are comparable; at higher energies, LCs are preferable. This conference paper is based on my recent PRL publication [1], supplemented with additional comments on linac-ring e+e- colliders and ring e+e- colliders with charge compensation (four-beam collisions).
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
