Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userA generalization of the Subspace Theorem with polynomials of higher degree
65
0
0.0
(
0
)
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
Recently, Corvaja and Zannier obtained an extension of the Subspace Theorem with arbitrary homogeneous polynomials of arbitrary degreee instead of linear forms. Their result states that the set of solutions in P^n(K) (K number field) of the inequality being considered is not Zariski dense. In our paper we prove by a different method a generalization of their result, in which the solutions are taken from an arbitrary projective variety X instead of P^n. Further, we give a quantitative version which states in a precise form that the solutions with large height lie ina finite number of proper subvarieties of X, with explicit upper bounds for the number and for the degrees of these subvarieties.
rate research
Read More
In 2002, Evertse and Schlickewei obtained a quantitative version of the so-called Absolute Parametric Subspace Theorem. This result deals with a parametrized class of twisted heights. One of the consequences of this result is a quantitative version of the Absolute Subspace Theorem, giving an explicit upper bound for the number of subspaces containing the solutions of the Diophantine inequality under consideration. In the present paper, we further improve Evertses and Schlickeweis quantitative version of the Absolute Parametric Subspace Theorem, and deduce an improved quantitative version of the Absolute Subspace Theorem. We combine ideas from the proof of Evertse and Schlickewei (which is basically a substantial refinement of Schmidts proof of his Subspace Theorem from 1972, with ideas from Faltings and Wuestholz proof of the Subspace Theorem.
Let $n$ be a positive integer. In 1915, Theisinger proved that if $nge 2$, then the $n$-th harmonic sum $sum_{k=1}^nfrac{1}{k}$ is not an integer. Let $a$ and $b$ be positive integers. In 1923, Nagell extended Theisingers theorem by showing that the reciprocal sum $sum_{k=1}^{n}frac{1}{a+(k-1)b}$ is not an integer if $nge 2$. In 1946, ErdH{o}s and Niven proved a theorem of a similar nature that states that there is only a finite number of integers $n$ for which one or more of the elementary symmetric functions of $1,1/2, ..., 1/n$ is an integer. In this paper, we present a generalization of Nagells theorem. In fact, we show that for arbitrary $n$ positive integers $s_1, ..., s_n$ (not necessarily distinct and not necessarily monotonic), the following reciprocal power sum $$sumlimits_{k=1}^{n}frac{1}{(a+(k-1)b)^{s_{k}}}$$ is never an integer if $nge 2$. The proof of our result is analytic and $p$-adic in character.
By virtue of Baileys well-known bilateral 6psi_6 summation formula and Watsons transformation formula,we extend the four-variable generalization of Ramanujans reciprocity theorem due to Andrews to a five-variable one. Some relevant new q-series identities including a new proof of Ramanujans reciprocity theorem and of Watsons quintuple product identity only based on Jacksons transformation are presented.
Let $G$ be a connected reductive group over a $p$-adic local field $F$. We propose and study the notions of $G$-$varphi$-modules and $G$-$(varphi, abla)$-modules over the Robba ring, which are exact faithful $F$-linear tensor functors from the category of $G$-representations on finite-dimensional $F$-vector spaces to the categories of $varphi$-modules and $(varphi, abla)$-modules over the Robba ring, respectively, commuting with the respective fiber functors. We study Kedlayas slope filtration theorem in this context, and show that $G$-$(varphi, abla)$-modules over the Robba ring are $G$-quasi-unipotent, which is a generalization of the $p$-adic local monodromy theorem proven independently by Y. Andre, K. S. Kedlaya, and Z. Mebkhout.
We define and investigate real analytic weak Jacobi forms of degree 1 and arbitrary rank. En route we calculate the Casimir operator associated to the maximal central extension of the real Jacobi group, which for rank exceeding 1 is of order 4. In ranks exceeding 1, the notions of H-harmonicity and semi-holomorphicity are the same.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
