Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userThe Last Aproach to the Settlement of the Jacobian Conjecture
122
0
0.0
(
0
)
Authors
Susumu Oda
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
Let S be a polynomial ring over a field of characteristic zero in finitely may variables. Let T be an unramified, finitely generated extension of S with $T^times = k^times$. Then T = S.
rate research
Read More
This article has been withdrown by the author.
We describe an algorithm that computes possible corners of hypothetical counterexamples to the Jacobian Conjecture up to a given bound. Using this algorithm we compute the possible families corresponding to $gcd(deg(P),deg(Q))le 35$, and all the pairs $(deg(P),deg(Q))$ with $max(deg(P),deg(Q))le 150$ for any hypothetical counterexample.
We prove that if the Jacobian Conjecture in two variables is false and (P,Q) is a standard minimal pair, then the Newton polygon HH(P) of P must satisfy several restrictions that had not been found previously. This allows us to discard some of the corners found in [GGV, Remark 7.14] for HH(P), together with some of the infinite families found in [H, Theorem~2.25]
Our goal is to settle a fading problem, the Jacobian Conjecture $(JC_n)$~: If $f_1, cdots, f_n$ are elements in a polynomial ring $k[X_1, cdots, X_n]$ over a field $k$ of characteristic zero such that $ det(partial f_i/ partial X_j) $ is a nonzero constant, then $k[f_1, cdots, f_n] = k[X_1, cdots, X_n]$. Practically, what we deal with is the generalized one, oindent The Generalized Jacobian Conjecture$(GJC)$ :{it Let $S hookrightarrow T$ be an unramified homomorphism of Noetherian domains. Assume that $S$ is a simply connected UFD ({sl i.e.,} ${rm Spec}(S)$ is simply connected and $S$ is a unique factorization domain) and that $T^times cap S = S^times$. Then $T = S$.} In addition, for consistency of the discussion, we raise some serious (or idiot) questions and some comments about the examples appeared in the papers published by the certain excellent mathematicians (though we are not willing to deal with them). However, the existence of such examples would be against our Main Result above, so that we have to dispute in Appendix B their arguments about the existence of their respective (so called) counter-examples. Our conclusion is that they are not perfect counter-examples which is shown explicitly.
Mustac{t}u{a} has given a conjecture for the graded Betti numbers in the minimal free resolution of the ideal of a general set of points on an irreducible projective algebraic variety. For surfaces in $mathbb P^3$ this conjecture has been proven for points on quadric surfaces and on general cubic surfaces. In the latter case, Gorenstein liaison was the main tool. Here we prove the conjecture for general quartic surfaces. Gorenstein liaison continues to be a central tool, but to prove the existence of our links we make use of certain dimension computations. We also discuss the higher degree case, but now the dimension count does not force the existence of our links.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
