Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userPhysical parameters of GRB 970508 and GRB 971214 from their afterglow synchrotron emission
195
0
0.0
(
0
)
Authors
R.A.M.J. Wijers
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
We have calculated synchrotron spectra of relativistic blast waves, and find predicted characteristic frequencies that are more than an order of magnitude different from previous calculations. For the case of an adiabatically expanding blast wave, which is applicable to observed gamma-ray burst (GRB) afterglows at late times, we give expressions to infer the physical properties of the afterglow from the measured spectral features. We show that enough data exist for GRB970508 to compute unambiguously the ambient density, n=0.03/cm**3, and the blast wave energy per unit solid angle, E=3E52 erg/4pi sr. We also compute the energy density in electrons and magnetic field. We find that they are 12% and 9%, respectively, of the nucleon energy density and thus confirm for the first time that both are close to but below equipartition. For GRB971214, we discuss the break found in its spectrum by Ramaprakash et al. (1998). It can be interpreted either as the peak frequency or as the cooling frequency; both interpretations have some problems, but on balance the break is more likely to be the cooling frequency. Even when we assume this, our ignorance of the self-absorption frequency and presence or absence of beaming make it impossible to constrain the physical parameters of GRB971214 very well.
rate research
Read More
We report on the results of optical follow-up observations of the counterpart of GRB 970508, starting 7 hours after the event. Multi-color U, B, V, R$_{c}$ and I$_{c}$ band observations were obtained during the first three consecutive nights. The counterpart was monitored regularly in R$_{c}$ until $sim$ 4 months after the burst. The light curve after the maximum follows a decline that can be fitted with a power law with exponent $alpha$ = --1.141 $pm$ 0.014. Deviations from a smooth power law decay are moderate (r.m.s. = 0.15 magnitude). We find no flattening of the light curve at late times. The optical afterglow fluence is a significant fraction, $sim$ 5%, of the GRB fluence. The optical energy distribution can be well represented by a power law, the slope of which changed at the time of the maximum (the spectrum became redder).
The curvature of a relativistic blast wave implies that its emission arrives to observers with a spread in time. This effect is believed to wash out fast variability in the lightcurves of GRB afterglows. We note that the spreading effect is reduced if emission is anisotropic in the rest-frame of the blast wave (i.e. if emission is limb-brightened or limb-darkened). In particular, synchrotron emission is almost certainly anisotropic, and may be strongly anisotropic, depending on details of electron acceleration in the blast wave. Anisotropic afterglows can display fast and strong variability at high frequencies (above the fast-cooling frequency). This may explain the existence of bizarre features in the X-ray afterglows of GRBs, such as sudden drops and flares. We also note that a moderate anisotropy can significantly delay the jet break in the lightcurve, which makes it harder to detect.
After more than 40 years from their discovery, the long-lasting tension between predictions and observations of GRBs prompt emission spectra starts to be solved. We found that the observed spectra can be produced by the synchrotron process, if the emitting particles do not completely cool. Evidence for incomplete cooling was recently found in Swift GRBs spectra with prompt observations down to 0.5 keV (Oganesyan et al. 2017, 2018), characterized by an additional low-energy break. In order to search for this break at higher energies, we analysed the 10 long and 10 short brightest GRBs detected by the Fermi satellite in over 10 years of activity. We found that in 8/10 long GRBs there is compelling evidence of a low energy break (below the peak energy) and the photon indices below and above that break are remarkably consistent with the values predicted by the synchrotron spectrum (-2/3 and -3/2, respectively). None of the ten short GRBs analysed shows a break, but the low energy spectral slope is consistent with -2/3. Within the framework of the GRB standard model, these results imply a very low magnetic field in the emission region, at odds with expectations. I also present the spectral evolution of GRB 190114C, the first GRB detected with high significance by the MAGIC Telescopes, which shows the compresence (in the keV-MeV energy range) of the prompt and of the afterglow emission, the latter rising and dominating the high energy part of the spectral energy range.
We present a comprehensive analysis of a bright, long duration (T90 ~ 257 s) GRB 110205A at redshift z= 2.22. The optical prompt emission was detected by Swift/UVOT, ROTSE-IIIb and BOOTES telescopes when the GRB was still radiating in the gamma-ray band. Nearly 200 s of observations were obtained simultaneously from optical, X-ray to gamma-ray, which makes it one of the exceptional cases to study the broadband spectral energy distribution across 6 orders of magnitude in energy during the prompt emission phase. By fitting the time resolved prompt spectra, we clearly identify, for the first time, an interesting two-break energy spectrum, roughly consistent with the standard GRB synchrotron emission model in the fast cooling regime. Although the prompt optical emission is brighter than the extrapolation of the best fit X/gamma-ray spectra, it traces the gamma-ray light curve shape, suggesting a relation to the prompt high energy emission. The synchrotron + SSC scenario is disfavored by the data, but the models invoking a pair of internal shocks or having two emission regions can interpret the data well. Shortly after prompt emission (~ 1100 s), a bright (R = 14.0) optical emission hump with very steep rise (alpha ~ 5.5) was observed which we interpret as the emission from the reverse shock. It is the first time that the rising phase of a reverse shock component has been closely observed. The full optical and X-ray afterglow lightcurves can be interpreted within the standard reverse shock (RS) + forward shock (FS) model. In general, the high quality prompt emission and afterglow data allow us to apply the standard fireball shock model to extract valuable information about the GRB including the radiation mechanism, radius of prompt emission R, initial Lorentz factor of the outflow, the composition of the ejecta, as well as the collimation angle and the total energy budget.
The afterglow of GRB 170817A has been detected for more than three years, but the origin of the multi-band afterglow light curves remains under debate. A classical top-hat jet model is faced with difficulties in producing a shallow rise of the afterglow light curves as observed $(F_{ u} propto T^{0.8})$. Here we reconsider the model of stratified ejecta with energy profile of $E(>Gamma beta)=E_0(Gamma beta)^{-k}$ as the origin of the afterglow light curves of the burst, where $Gamma$ and $beta$ are the Lorentz factor and speed of the ejecta, respectively. $k$ is the power-law slope of the energy profile. We consider the ejecta are collimated into jets. Two kinds of jet evolutions are investigated, including a lateral-spreading jet and a non-lateral-spreading jet. We fit the multi-band afterglow light curves, including the X-ray data at one thousand days post-burst, and find that both the models of the spreading and non-spreading jets can fit the light curves well, but the observed angular size of the source and the apparent velocity of the flux centroid for the spreading jet model are beyond the observation limits, while the non-spreading jet model meets the observation limits. Some of the best-fit parameters for the non-spreading jet model, such as the number density of the circumburst medium $sim10^{-2}$ cm$^{-3}$ and the total jet kinetic energy $E sim 4.8times 10^{51}$ erg, also appear plausible. The best-fit slope of the jet energy profile is $k sim 7.1$. Our results suggest that the afterglow of GRB 170817A may arise from the stratified jet and that the lateral spreading of the jet is not significant.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
