Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userRedshift Dependence of QSO Spectral Variability
85
0
0.0
(
0
)
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
We present a combined analysis of the optical spectral variability for two samples of QSOs, 42 objects at $z<0.4$ monitored at the Wise Observatory (Giveon et al 1999), plus 59 objects up to $zsim 3$ in the field of the Magellanic Clouds, detected and/or monitored within the MACHO Project database (Geha et al 2003). Our analysis shows some increase of the observed spectral variability as a function of redshift, with a large scatter. These data are compared with a model based on the addition of flares of different temperatures to a stationary quasar SED, taking into account also the intrinsic scatter of the SEDs.
rate research
Read More
The relationship between variability, luminosity and redshift in the South Galactic Pole QSO sample is examined in an effort to disentangle the effects of luminosity and redshift in the amplitude of the optical variations. The anticorrelation between variability and luminosity found by other authors is confirmed. Our analysis also supports claims that variability increases with redshift, most likely due to an anticorrelation between variability and wavelength. In particular, our parametric fits show that the QSO variability-wavelength relation is consistent with that observed in low-luminosity nearby active galactic nuclei. The results are used to constrain Poissonian-type models. We find that if QSO variability results from a random superposition of pulses, then the individual events must have B-band energies between $sim 10^{50}$ and a few times $10^{51}$ erg and time-scales of $sim 2$ yr. Generalized Poissonian models in which the pulse energy and lifetime scale with luminosity are also discussed.
We report on the discovery of a dramatic X-ray spectral variability event observed in a $zsim 1$ broad line type-1 QSO. The XMM-Newton spectrum from the year 2000 is characterized by an unobscured power-law spectrum with photon index of $Gammasim 2$, a column density of $N_{mathrm{H}}sim 5times 10^{20},mathrm{cm^{-2}}$, and no prominent reflection component. Five years later, Chandra captured the source in a heavily-obscured, reflection-dominated state. The observed X-ray spectral variability could be caused by a Compton-thick cloud with $N_{mathrm{H}}sim 2times 10^{24},mathrm{cm^{-2}}$ eclipsing the direct emission of the hot corona, implying an extreme $N_{mathrm{H}}$ variation never before observed in a type-1 QSO. An alternative scenario is a corona that switched off in between the observations. In addition, both explanations require a significant change of the X-ray luminosity prior to the obscuration or fading of the corona and/or a change of the relative geometry of the source/reflector system. Dramatic X-ray spectral variability of this kind could be quite common in type-1 QSOs, considering the relatively few datasets in which such an event could have been identified. Our analysis implies that there may be a population of type-1 QSOs which are Compton-thick in the X-rays when observed at any given time.
We present a power spectrum analysis of the final 2dF QSO Redshift Survey catalogue containing 22652 QSOs. Utilising the huge volume probed by the QSOs, we can accurately measure power out to scales of ~500Mpc and derive new constraints, at z~1.4, on the matter and baryonic contents of the Universe. Importantly, these new cosmological constraints are derived at an intermediate epoch between the CMB observations at z~1000, and local (z~0) studies of large-scale structure; the average QSO redshift corresponds to a look-back time of approximately two-thirds of the age of the Universe. We find that the amplitude of clustering of the QSOs at z~1.4 is similar to that of present day galaxies. The power spectra of the QSOs at high and low redshift are compared and we find little evidence for any evolution in the amplitude. Assuming a lambda cosmology to derive the comoving distances, r(z), to the QSOs, the power spectrum derived can be well described by a model with shape parameter Gamma=0.13+-0.02. If an Einstein-de Sitter model r(z) is instead assumed, a slightly higher value of Gamma=0.16+-0.03 is obtained. A comparison with the Hubble Volume LCDM simulation shows very good agreement over the whole range of scales considered. A standard (Omega_m=1) CDM model, however, predicts a much higher value of Gamma than is observed, and it is difficult to reconcile such a model with these data. We fit CDM model power spectra (assuming scale-invariant initial fluctuations), convolved with the survey window function, and corrected for redshift space distortions, and find that models with baryon oscillations are slightly preferred, with the baryon fraction Omega_b/Omega_m=0.18+-0.10. The overall shape of the power spectrum provides a strong constraint on Omega_m*h (where h is the Hubble parameter), with Omega_m*h=0.19+-0.05.
The Swift satellite has observed more than a thousand GRBs with X-ray data. Almost a third of them have redshift measurement, too. Here we start to investigate the X-ray spectral fitting of the data considering the low energy part where the N(H) absorption happens. Based on the available more accurate input data we examined the robustness of previous fittings and tested how sensitive the changes of the starting parameters are. We studied the change of the intrinsic hydrogen column density during the outburst for a few events. No significant variability of N(H) column density was identified.
We analyse the redshift-space (z-space) distortions of QSO clustering in the 2dF QSO Redshift Survey (2QZ). To interpret the z-space correlation function, xi(sigma,pi), we require an accurate model for the QSO real-space correlation function, xi(r). Although a single power-law xi(r) model fits the projected correlation function (wp(sigma)) at small scales, it implies somewhat too shallow a slope for both wp(sigma) and the z-space correlation function, xi(s), at larger scales > 20 h^(-1) Mpc. Motivated by the form for xi(r) seen in the 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey (2dFGRS) and in standard LCDM predictions, we use a double power-law model for xi(r) which gives a good fit to xi(s) and wp(sigma). The model is parametrized by a slope of gamma=1.45 for 1<r<10 h^(-1) Mpc and gamma=2.30 for 10<r<40 h^(-1) Mpc. As found for 2dFGRS, the value of beta determined from the ratio of xi(s)/xi(r) depends sensitively on the form of xi(r) assumed. With our double power-law form for xi(r), we measure beta(z=1.4)=0.32(+0.09)(-0.11). Assuming the same model for xi(r) we then analyse the z-space distortions in the 2QZ xi(sigma,pi) and put constraints on the values of Omega m and beta(z=1.4), using an improved version of the method of Hoyle et al. The constraints we derive are Omega m=0.35(+0.19)(-0.13), beta(z=1.4)=0.50(+0.13)(-0.15), in agreement with our xi(s)/xi(r) results at the ~1 sigma level.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
