Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userOn the nature of X-ray Bright Optically Normal galaxies
60
0
0.0
(
0
)
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
Multiwavelength observations of the hard X-ray selected sources by Chandra and XMM-Newton surveys have significantly improved our knowledge of the objects responsible of the hard X-ray background. A surprising finding is the discovery of a population of optically dull, X-ray bright galaxies emerging at 2-10 keV fluxes of the order of 10^{-14} erg cm^{-2} s^{-1}. We present preliminary results of multiwavelength observations of a few objects serendipitously discovered in the field of XMM-Newton and Chandra observations and intensively studied at longer wavelengths.
rate research
Read More
X-ray Bright Optically Normal Galaxies (XBONGs) constitute a small but not negligible fraction of hard X-ray selected sources in recent Chandra and XMM-Newton surveys. Even though several possibilities were proposed to explain why a relatively luminous hard X-ray source does not leave any significant signature of its presence in terms of optical emission lines, the nature of XBONGs is still subject of debate. We aim to a better understanding of their nature by means of a multiwavelength and morphological analysis of a small sample of these sources. Good-quality photometric near-infrared data (ISAAC/VLT) of four low-redshift (z=0.1-0.3) XBONGs, selected from the HELLAS2XMM survey, have been used to search for the presence of the putative nucleus, applying the surface-brightness decomposition technique through the least-squares fitting program GALFIT. The surface brightness decomposition allows us to reveal a nuclear point-like source, likely to be responsible of the X-ray emission, in two out of the four sources. The results indicate that moderate amounts of gas and dust, covering a large solid angle (possibly 4pi) at the nuclear source, combined with the low nuclear activity, may explain the lack of optical emission lines. The third XBONG is associated with an X-ray extended source and no nuclear excess is detected in the near infrared at the limits of our observations. The last source is associated to a close (d< 1 arcsec) double system and the fitting procedure cannot achieve a firm conclusion.
In this paper we investigate the properties of low X-ray-to-optical flux ratio sources detected in a wide area (2.5deg^2) shallow (f(0.5-8keV)~10e-14cgs) XMM-Newton survey. We find a total of 26 sources (5% of the total X-ray selected population) with log f_X/f_{opt}<-0.9 to the above flux limit. Optical spectroscopy is available for 20 of these low X-ray-to-optical flux ratio objects. Most of them are found to be associated with Galactic stars (total of 8) and broad line AGNs (total of 8).We also find two sources with optical spectra showing absorption and/or narrow emission lines and X-ray/optical properties suggesting AGN activity. Another two sources are found to be associated with low redshift galaxies with narrow emission line optical spectra, X-ray luminosities L_X(0.5-8keV)~10e41cgs and logf_X/f_opt ~ -2 suggesting `normal star-forming galaxies. Despite the small number statistics the sky density of `normal X-ray selected star-forming galaxies at the flux limit of the present sample is low consistent with previous ROSAT HRI deep surveys. Also, the number density estimated here is in good agreement with both the logN-logS of `normal galaxies in the Chandra Deep Field North (extrapolated to bright fluxes) and model predictions based on the X-ray luminosity function of local star-forming galaxies.
We have studied the correlation among X-ray absorption, optical reddening and nuclear dust morphology in Seyfert 2 galaxies. Two main conclusions emerge: a) the Balmer decrement and the amount of X-ray absorption are anticorrelated on a wide range of column density: 10^{21} < N_H < 10^{24} atoms/cm/cm. The correlation does no longer apply to Compton-thick objects (N_H < 10^{24} atoms/cm/cm), although they span a comparable range in Balmer decrement; b) Compton-thin Seyfert 2s seem to prefer nuclear environments, which are rich of dust on scales of the hundreds parsecs. On the other hand, Compton-thick Seyferts exhibit indifferently ``dust-poor and ``dust-rich environments. These results support an extension of the Seyfert unification scenario (as recently proposed by Matt, 2000), where Compton-thick Seyfert 2s are observed through compact ``torii, whereas Compton-thin ones are obscured by dust on much larger scales
We show that the observed relationship between the fraction of low-mass X-ray binaries (LMXBs) found in globular clusters (GCs) and the GC-specific frequency for early-type galaxies is consistent with an LMXB formation model in which the field population of LMXBs is formed in situ via primordial binary formation. The suggestion that a significant fraction of the field LMXB population in early-type galaxies was formed in GCs is not required by the data. Finally, we discuss observational studies that will test this model more thoroughly.
We use the number counts of X-ray selected normal galaxies to explore their evolution by combining the most recent wide-angle shallow and pencil-beam deep samples available. The differential X-ray number counts, dN/dS, for early and late-type normal galaxies are constructed separately and then compared with the predictions of the local X-ray luminosity function under different evolution scenarios. The dN/dS of early type galaxies is consistent with no evolution out to z~0.5. For late-type galaxies our analysis suggests that it is the sources with X-ray--to--optical flux ratio logfx/fopt>-2 that are evolving the fastest. Including these systems in the late-type galaxy sample yields evolution of the form ~(1+z)^{2.7} out to z~0.4. On the contrary late-type sources with logfx/fopt<-2 are consistent with no evolution. This suggests that the logfx/fopt>-2 population comprises the most powerful and fast evolving starbursts at moderate and high-z. We argue that although residual low-luminosity AGN contamination may bias our results toward stronger evolution, this is unlikely to modify our main conclusions.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
