Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userLimitations on Realistic Hyperbolic Graph Drawing
74
0
0.0
(
0
)
Added by
David Eppstein
Publication date
2021
fields
Informatics Engineering
and research's language is
English
Authors
David Eppstein
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
We show that several types of graph drawing in the hyperbolic plane require features of the drawing to be separated from each other by sub-constant distances, distances so small that they can be accurately approximated by Euclidean distance. Therefore, for these types of drawing, hyperbolic geometry provides no benefit over Euclidean graph drawing.
rate research
Read More
Proceedings of GD2020: This volume contains the papers presented at GD~2020, the 28th International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization, held on September 18-20, 2020 online. Graph drawing is concerned with the geometric representation of graphs and constitutes the algorithmic core of network visualization. Graph drawing and network visualization are motivated by applications where it is crucial to visually analyse and interact with relational datasets. Information about the conference series and past symposia is maintained at http://www.graphdrawing.org. The 2020 edition of the conference was hosted by University Of British Columbia, with Will Evans as chair of the Organizing Committee. A total of 251 participants attended the conference.
It is well-known that both the pathwidth and the outer-planarity of a graph can be used to obtain lower bounds on the height of a planar straight-line drawing of a graph. But both bounds fall short for some graphs. In this paper, we consider two other parameters, the (simple) homotopy height and the (simple) grid-major height. We discuss the relationship between them and to the other parameters, and argue that they give lower bounds on the straight-line drawing height that are never worse than the ones obtained from pathwidth and outer-planarity.
This is the arXiv index for the electronic proceedings of GD 2019, which contains the peer-reviewed and revised accepted papers with an optional appendix. Proceedings (without appendices) are also to be published by Springer in the Lecture Notes in Computer Science series.
This is the arXiv index for the electronic proceedings of GD 2021, which contains the peer-reviewed and revised accepted papers with an optional appendix. Proceedings (without appendices) are also to be published by Springer in the Lecture Notes in Computer Science series.
We investigate the problem of drawing graphs in 2D and 3D such that their edges (or only their vertices) can be covered by few lines or planes. We insist on straight-line edges and crossing-free drawings. This problem has many connections to other challenging graph-drawing problems such as small-area or small-volume drawings, layered or track drawings, and drawing graphs with low visual complexity. While some facts about our problem are implicit in previous work, this is the first treatment of the problem in its full generality. Our contribution is as follows. We show lower and upper bounds for the numbers of lines and planes needed for covering drawings of graphs in certain graph classes. In some cases our bounds are asymptotically tight; in some cases we are able to determine exact values. We relate our parameters to standard combinatorial characteristics of graphs (such as the chromatic number, treewidth, maximum degree, or arboricity) and to parameters that have been studied in graph drawing (such as the track number or the number of segments appearing in a drawing). We pay special attention to planar graphs. For example, we show that there are planar graphs that can be drawn in 3-space on a lot fewer lines than in the plane.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
