Recent studies have shown that the majority of published computational models in systems biology and physiology are not repeatable or reproducible. There are a variety of reasons for this. One of the most likely reasons is that given how busy modern researchers are and the fact that no credit is given to authors for publishing repeatable work, it is inevitable that this will be the case. The situation can only be rectified when government agencies, universities and other research institutions change policies and that journals begin to insist that published work is in fact at least repeatable if not reproducible. In this chapter guidelines are described that can be used by researchers to help make sure their work is repeatable. A scoring system is suggested that authors can use to determine how well they are doing.
Download