Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userDynamic prediction and analysis based on restricted mean survival time in survival analysis with nonproportional hazards
116
0
0.0
(
0
)
Added by
Zheng Chen
Publication date
2021
fields
Mathematical Statistics
and research's language is
English
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
In the process of clinical diagnosis and treatment, the restricted mean survival time (RMST), which reflects the life expectancy of patients up to a specified time, can be used as an appropriate outcome measure. However, the RMST only calculates the mean survival time of patients within a period of time after the start of follow-up and may not accurately portray the change in a patients life expectancy over time. The life expectancy can be adjusted for the time the patient has already survived and defined as the conditional restricted mean survival time (cRMST). A dynamic RMST model based on the cRMST can be established by incorporating time-dependent covariates and covariates with time-varying effects. We analysed data from a study of primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) to illustrate the use of the dynamic RMST model. The predictive performance was evaluated using the C-index and the prediction error. The proposed dynamic RMST model, which can explore the dynamic effects of prognostic factors on survival time, has better predictive performance than the RMST model. Three PBC patient examples were used to illustrate how the predicted cRMST changed at different prediction times during follow-up. The use of the dynamic RMST model based on the cRMST allows for optimization of evidence-based decision-making by updating personalized dynamic life expectancy for patients.
rate research
Read More
Competing risks data are common in medical studies, and the sub-distribution hazard (SDH) ratio is considered an appropriate measure. However, because the limitations of hazard itself are not easy to interpret clinically and because the SDH ratio is valid only under the proportional SDH assumption, this article introduced an alternative index under competing risks, named restricted mean time lost (RMTL). Several test procedures were also constructed based on RMTL. First, we introduced the definition and estimation of RMTL based on Aalen-Johansen cumulative incidence functions. Then, we considered several combined tests based on the SDH and the RMTL difference (RMTLd). The statistical properties of the methods are evaluated using simulations and are applied to two examples. The type I errors of combined tests are close to the nominal level. All combined tests show acceptable power in all situations. In conclusion, RMTL can meaningfully summarize treatment effects for clinical decision making, and three combined tests have robust power under various conditions, which can be considered for statistical inference in real data analysis.
Antibodies, an essential part of our immune system, develop through an intricate process to bind a wide array of pathogens. This process involves randomly mutating DNA sequences encoding these antibodies to find variants with improved binding, though mutations are not distributed uniformly across sequence sites. Immunologists observe this nonuniformity to be consistent with mutation motifs, which are short DNA subsequences that affect how likely a given site is to experience a mutation. Quantifying the effect of motifs on mutation rates is challenging: a large number of possible motifs makes this statistical problem high dimensional, while the unobserved history of the mutation process leads to a nontrivial missing data problem. We introduce an $ell_1$-penalized proportional hazards model to infer mutation motifs and their effects. In order to estimate model parameters, our method uses a Monte Carlo EM algorithm to marginalize over the unknown ordering of mutations. We show that our method performs better on simulated data compared to current methods and leads to more parsimonious models. The application of proportional hazards to mutation processes is, to our knowledge, novel and formalizes the current methods in a statistical framework that can be easily extended to analyze the effect of other biological features on mutation rates.
We discuss causal mediation analyses for survival data and propose a new approach based on the additive hazards model. The emphasis is on a dynamic point of view, that is, understanding how the direct and indirect effects develop over time. Hence, importantly, we allow for a time varying mediator. To define direct and indirect effects in such a longitudinal survival setting we take an interventional approach (Didelez (2018)) where treatment is separated into one aspect affecting the mediator and a different aspect affecting survival. In general, this leads to a version of the non-parametric g-formula (Robins (1986)). In the present paper, we demonstrate that combining the g-formula with the additive hazards model and a sequential linear model for the mediator process results in simple and interpretable expressions for direct and indirect effects in terms of relative survival as well as cumulative hazards. Our results generalise and formalise the method of dynamic path analysis (Fosen et al. (2006), Strohmaier et al. (2015)). An application to data from a clinical trial on blood pressure medication is given.
With the availability of massive amounts of data from electronic health records and registry databases, incorporating time-varying patient information to improve risk prediction has attracted great attention. To exploit the growing amount of predictor information over time, we develop a unified framework for landmark prediction using survival tree ensembles, where an updated prediction can be performed when new information becomes available. Compared to the conventional landmark prediction, our framework enjoys great flexibility in that the landmark times can be subject-specific and triggered by an intermediate clinical event. Moreover, the nonparametric approach circumvents the thorny issue in model incompatibility at different landmark times. When both the longitudinal predictors and the outcome event time are subject to right censoring, existing tree-based approaches cannot be directly applied. To tackle the analytical challenges, we consider a risk-set-based ensemble procedure by averaging martingale estimating equations from individual trees. Extensive simulation studies are conducted to evaluate the performance of our methods. The methods are applied to the Cystic Fibrosis Patient Registry (CFFPR) data to perform dynamic prediction of lung disease in cystic fibrosis patients and to identify important prognosis factors.
We study the variable selection problem in survival analysis to identify the most important factors affecting the survival time when the variables have prior knowledge that they have a mutual correlation through a graph structure. We consider the Cox proportional hazard model with a graph-based regularizer for variable selection. A computationally efficient algorithm is developed to solve the graph regularized maximum likelihood problem by connecting to group lasso. We provide theoretical guarantees about the recovery error and asymptotic distribution of the proposed estimators. The good performance and benefit of the proposed approach compared with existing methods are demonstrated in both synthetic and real data examples.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
