Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userThe Laplace Mechanism has optimal utility for differential privacy over continuous queries
146
0
0.0
(
0
)
Added by
Natasha Fernandes
Publication date
2021
fields
Informatics Engineering
and research's language is
English
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
Differential Privacy protects individuals data when statistical queries are published from aggregated databases: applying obfuscating mechanisms to the query results makes the released information less specific but, unavoidably, also decreases its utility. Yet it has been shown that for discrete data (e.g. counting queries), a mandated degree of privacy and a reasonable interpretation of loss of utility, the Geometric obfuscating mechanism is optimal: it loses as little utility as possible. For continuous query results however (e.g. real numbers) the optimality result does not hold. Our contribution here is to show that optimality is regained by using the Laplace mechanism for the obfuscation. The technical apparatus involved includes the earlier discrete result by Ghosh et al., recent work on abstract channels and their geometric representation as hyper-distributions, and the dual interpretations of distance between distributions provided by the Kantorovich-Rubinstein Theorem.
rate research
Read More
Differential privacy (DP) and local differential privacy (LPD) are frameworks to protect sensitive information in data collections. They are both based on obfuscation. In DP the noise is added to the result of queries on the dataset, whereas in LPD the noise is added directly on the individual records, before being collected. The main advantage of LPD with respect to DP is that it does not need to assume a trusted third party. The main disadvantage is that the trade-off between privacy and utility is usually worse than in DP, and typically to retrieve reasonably good statistics from the locally sanitized data it is necessary to have a huge collection of them. In this paper, we focus on the problem of estimating counting queries from collections of noisy answers, and we propose a variant of LDP based on the addition of geometric noise. Our main result is that the geometric noise has a better statistical utility than other LPD mechanisms from the literature.
The wide deployment of machine learning in recent years gives rise to a great demand for large-scale and high-dimensional data, for which the privacy raises serious concern. Differential privacy (DP) mechanisms are conventionally developed for scalar values, not for structural data like matrices. Our work proposes Improved Matrix Gaussian Mechanism (IMGM) for matrix-valued DP, based on the necessary and sufficient condition of $ (varepsilon,delta) $-differential privacy. IMGM only imposes constraints on the singular values of the covariance matrices of the noise, which leaves room for design. Among the legitimate noise distributions for matrix-valued DP, we find the optimal one turns out to be i.i.d. Gaussian noise, and the DP constraint becomes a noise lower bound on each element. We further derive a tight composition method for IMGM. Apart from the theoretical analysis, experiments on a variety of models and datasets also verify that IMGM yields much higher utility than the state-of-the-art mechanisms at the same privacy guarantee.
When collecting information, local differential privacy (LDP) alleviates privacy concerns of users because their private information is randomized before being sent it to the central aggregator. LDP imposes large amount of noise as each user executes the randomization independently. To address this issue, recent work introduced an intermediate server with the assumption that this intermediate server does not collude with the aggregator. Under this assumption, less noise can be added to achieve the same privacy guarantee as LDP, thus improving utility for the data collection task. This paper investigates this multiple-party setting of LDP. We analyze the system model and identify potential adversaries. We then make two improvements: a new algorithm that achieves a better privacy-utility tradeoff; and a novel protocol that provides better protection against various attacks. Finally, we perform experiments to compare different methods and demonstrate the benefits of using our proposed method.
Differential privacy is the state-of-the-art formal definition for data release under strong privacy guarantees. A variety of mechanisms have been proposed in the literature for releasing the noisy output of numeric queries (e.g., using the Laplace mechanism), based on the notions of global sensitivity and local sensitivity. However, although there has been some work on generic mechanisms for releasing the output of non-numeric queries using global sensitivity (e.g., the Exponential mechanism), the literature lacks generic mechanisms for releasing the output of non-numeric queries using local sensitivity to reduce the noise in the query output. In this work, we remedy this shortcoming and present the local dampening mechanism. We adapt the notion of local sensitivity for the non-numeric setting and leverage it to design a generic non-numeric mechanism. We illustrate the effectiveness of the local dampening mechanism by applying it to two diverse problems: (i) Influential node analysis. Given an influence metric, we release the top-k most central nodes while preserving the privacy of the relationship between nodes in the network; (ii) Decision tree induction. We provide a private adaptation to the ID3 algorithm to build decision trees from a given tabular dataset. Experimental results show that we could reduce the use of privacy budget by 3 to 4 orders of magnitude for Influential node analysis and increase accuracy up to 12% for Decision tree induction when compared to global sensitivity based approaches.
We propose a new mechanism to accurately answer a user-provided set of linear counting queries under local differential privacy (LDP). Given a set of linear counting queries (the workload) our mechanism automatically adapts to provide accuracy on the workload queries. We define a parametric class of mechanisms that produce unbiased estimates of the workload, and formulate a constrained optimization problem to select a mechanism from this class that minimizes expected total squared error. We solve this optimization problem numerically using projected gradient descent and provide an efficient implementation that scales to large workloads. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our optimization-based approach in a wide variety of settings, showing that it outperforms many competitors, even outperforming existing mechanisms on the workloads for which they were intended.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
