Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userControlling False Discovery Rates under Cross-Sectional Correlations
390
0
0.0
(
0
)
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
We consider controlling the false discovery rate for testing many time series with an unknown cross-sectional correlation structure. Given a large number of hypotheses, false and missing discoveries can plague an analysis. While many procedures have been proposed to control false discovery, most of them either assume independent hypotheses or lack statistical power. A problem of particular interest is in financial asset pricing, where the goal is to determine which ``factors lead to excess returns out of a large number of potential factors. Our contribution is two-fold. First, we show the consistency of Fama and Frenchs prominent method under multiple testing. Second, we propose a novel method for false discovery control using double bootstrapping. We achieve superior statistical power to existing methods and prove that the false discovery rate is controlled. Simulations and a real data application illustrate the efficacy of our method over existing methods.
rate research
Read More
We develop a new class of distribution--free multiple testing rules for false discovery rate (FDR) control under general dependence. A key element in our proposal is a symmetrized data aggregation (SDA) approach to incorporating the dependence structure via sample splitting, data screening and information pooling. The proposed SDA filter first constructs a sequence of ranking statistics that fulfill global symmetry properties, and then chooses a data--driven threshold along the ranking to control the FDR. The SDA filter substantially outperforms the knockoff method in power under moderate to strong dependence, and is more robust than existing methods based on asymptotic $p$-values. We first develop finite--sample theory to provide an upper bound for the actual FDR under general dependence, and then establish the asymptotic validity of SDA for both the FDR and false discovery proportion (FDP) control under mild regularity conditions. The procedure is implemented in the R package texttt{SDA}. Numerical results confirm the effectiveness and robustness of SDA in FDR control and show that it achieves substantial power gain over existing methods in many settings.
The knockoff-based multiple testing setup of Barber & Candes (2015) for variable selection in multiple regression where sample size is as large as the number of explanatory variables is considered. The method of Benjamini & Hochberg (1995) based on ordinary least squares estimates of the regression coefficients is adjusted to the setup, transforming it to a valid p-value based false discovery rate controlling method not relying on any specific correlation structure of the explanatory variables. Simulations and real data applications show that our proposed method that is agnostic to {pi}0, the proportion of unimportant explanatory variables, and a data-adaptive version of it that uses an estimate of {pi}0 are powerful competitors of the false discovery rate controlling method in Barber & Candes (2015).
In many domains, data measurements can naturally be associated with the leaves of a tree, expressing the relationships among these measurements. For example, companies belong to industries, which in turn belong to ever coarser divisions such as sectors; microbes are commonly arranged in a taxonomic hierarchy from species to kingdoms; street blocks belong to neighborhoods, which in turn belong to larger-scale regions. The problem of tree-based aggregation that we consider in this paper asks which of these tree-defined subgroups of leaves should really be treated as a single entity and which of these entities should be distinguished from each other. We introduce the false split rate, an error measure that describes the degree to which subgroups have been split when they should not have been. We then propose a multiple hypothesis testing algorithm for tree-based aggregation, which we prove controls this error measure. We focus on two main examples of tree-based aggregation, one which involves aggregating means and the other which involves aggregating regression coefficients. We apply this methodology to aggregate stocks based on their volatility and to aggregate neighborhoods of New York City based on taxi fares.
Selecting relevant features associated with a given response variable is an important issue in many scientific fields. Quantifying quality and uncertainty of a selection result via false discovery rate (FDR) control has been of recent interest. This paper introduces a way of using data-splitting strategies to asymptotically control the FDR while maintaining a high power. For each feature, the method constructs a test statistic by estimating two independent regression coefficients via data splitting. FDR control is achieved by taking advantage of the statistics property that, for any null feature, its sampling distribution is symmetric about zero. Furthermore, we propose Multiple Data Splitting (MDS) to stabilize the selection result and boost the power. Interestingly and surprisingly, with the FDR still under control, MDS not only helps overcome the power loss caused by sample splitting, but also results in a lower variance of the false discovery proportion (FDP) compared with all other methods in consideration. We prove that the proposed data-splitting methods can asymptotically control the FDR at any designated level for linear and Gaussian graphical models in both low and high dimensions. Through intensive simulation studies and a real-data application, we show that the proposed methods are robust to the unknown distribution of features, easy to implement and computationally efficient, and are often the most powerful ones amongst competitors especially when the signals are weak and the correlations or partial correlations are high among features.
False discovery rates (FDR) are an essential component of statistical inference, representing the propensity for an observed result to be mistaken. FDR estimates should accompany observed results to help the user contextualize the relevance and potential impact of findings. This paper introduces a new user-friendly R package for computing FDRs and adjusting p-values for FDR control. These tools respect the critical difference between the adjusted p-value and the estimated FDR for a particular finding, which are sometimes numerically identical but are often confused in practice. Newly augmented methods for estimating the null proportion of findings - an important part of the FDR estimation procedure - are proposed and evaluated. The package is broad, encompassing a variety of methods for FDR estimation and FDR control, and includes plotting functions for easy display of results. Through extensive illustrations, we strongly encourage wider reporting of false discovery rates for observed findings.
suggested questions
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
