Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userDissecting the Energy Budget of a Gamma-Ray Burst Fireball
118
0
0.0
(
0
)
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
The jet composition and radiative efficiency of GRBs are poorly constrained from the data. If the jet composition is matter-dominated (i.e. a fireball), the GRB prompt emission spectra would include a dominant thermal component originating from the fireball photosphere, and a non-thermal component presumably originating from internal shocks whose radii are greater than the photosphere radius. We propose a method to directly dissect the GRB fireball energy budget into three components and measure their values by combining the prompt emission and early afterglow data. The measured parameters include the initial dimensionless specific enthalpy density ($eta$), bulk Lorentz factors at the photosphere radius ($Gamma_{rm ph}$) and before fireball deceleration ($Gamma_0$), the amount of mass loading ($M$), as well as the GRB radiative efficiency ($eta_gamma$). All the parameters can be derived from the data for a GRB with a dominant thermal spectral component, a deceleration bump feature in the early afterglow lightcurve, and a measured redshift. The results only weakly depend on the density $n$ of the interstellar medium when the composition ${cal Y}$ parameter (typically unity) is specified.
rate research
Read More
We investigate properties of the interstellar medium (ISM) in galaxies hosting long-duration gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) from an analysis of atomic species (MgI, FeI) and excited fine-structure levels of ions (e.g. SiII). Our analysis is guided primarily by echelle observations of GRB 050730 and GRB 051111. These sightlines exhibit fine-structure transitions of OI, SiII, and FeII gas that have not yet been detected in intervening quasar absorption line systems. Our results indicate that the gas with large MgI equivalent width (e.g. GRB 051111) must occur at distances >~50pc from GRB afterglows to avoid photoionization. We examine the mechanisms for fine-structure excitation and find two processes can contribute: (1) indirect UV pumping by the GRB afterglow provided a far-UV intensity in excess of 10^6 times the Galactic radiation field; and (2) collisional excitation in gas with electron density n_e>10^4 cm^-3. The observed abundances of excited ions are well explained by UV pumping with the gas at approximately a few hundred pc from the afterglow for GRB 051111 and r<100pc for GRB 050730, without invoking extreme gas density and temperature in the ISM. We show that UV pumping alone provides a simple explanation for all reported detections of excited ions in GRB afterglow spectra. The presence of strong fine-structure transitions therefore may offer little constraint for the gas density or temperature. We discuss additional implications of UV pumping including its impact on chemical abundance measurements, new prospects for observing line-strength variability, and future prospects for studying the gas density and temperature. Finally, we list a series of criteria that can distinguish between the mechanisms of UV pumping and collisional excitation.
We study the emission observed at energies greater than 100 MeV of 11 Gamma Ray Bursts (GRBs) detected by the Fermi/Large Area Telescope (LAT) until October 2009. The GeV emission has three main properties: (i) its duration is often longer than the duration of the softer emission detected by the Gamma Burst Monitor (GBM) onboard Fermi [this confirms earlier results from the Energetic Gamma-Ray Experiment Telescope (EGRET)]; (ii) its spectrum is consistent with F(v) propto v^(-1) and does not show strong spectral evolution; (iii) for the brightest bursts, the flux detected by the LAT decays as a power law with a typical slope: t^(-1.5). We argue that the observed >0.1 GeV flux can be interpreted as afterglow emission shortly following the start of the prompt phase emission as seen at smaller frequencies. The decay slope is what expected if the fireball emission is produced in the radiative regime, i.e. all dissipated energy is radiated away. We also argue that the detectability in the GeV energy range depends on the bulk Lorentz factor Gamma of the bursts, being strongly favoured in the case of large Gamma. This implies that the fraction of bursts detected at high energies corresponds to the fraction of bursts having the largest Gamma. The radiative interpretation can help to explain why the observed X-ray and optical afterglow energetics are much smaller than the energetics emitted during the prompt phase, despite the fact that the collision with the external medium should be more efficient than internal shocks in producing the radiation we see.
136 -
H. Abdalla R. Adam F. Aharonian F. Ait Benkhali E.O. Anguener M.n Arakawa
, C. Arcaro
, C. Armand
2019
Gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) are brief flashes of gamma rays, considered to be the most energetic explosive phenomena in the Universe. The emission from GRBs comprises a short (typically tens of seconds) and bright prompt emission, followed by a much longer afterglow phase. During the afterglow phase, the shocked outflow -- produced by the interaction between the ejected matter and the circumburst medium -- slows down, and a gradual decrease in brightness is observed. GRBs typically emit most of their energy via gamma-rays with energies in the kiloelectronvolt-to-megaelectronvolt range, but a few photons with energies of tens of gigaelectronvolts have been detected by space-based instruments. However, the origins of such high-energy (above one gigaelectronvolt) photons and the presence of very-high-energy (more than 100 gigaelectronvolts) emission have remained elussive. Here we report observations of very-high-energy emission in the bright GRB 180720B deep in the GRB afterglow -ten hours after the end of the prompt emission phase, when the X-ray flux had already decayed by four orders of magnitude. Two possible explanations exist for the observed radiation: inverse Compton emission and synchrotron emission of ultrarelativistic electrons. Our observations show that the energy fluxes in the X-ray and gamma-ray range and their photon indices remain comparable to each other throughout the afterglow. This discovery places distinct constraints on the GRB environment for both emission mechanisms, with the inverse Compton explanation alleviating the particle energy requirements for the emission observed at late times. The late timing of this detection has consequences for the future observations of GRBs at the highest energies.
Since its launch in 2004, the Swift satellite has monitored the X-ray afterglows of several hundred Gamma-Ray Bursts, and revealed that their X-ray light-curves are more complex than previously thought, exhibiting up to three power-law segments. Energy injection into the relativistic blast-wave energizing the burst ambient medium has been proposed most often to be the reason for the X-ray afterglow complexity. We examine 117 light-curve breaks of 98 Swift X-ray afterglows, selected for their high-quality monitoring and well-constrained flux decay rates. Thirty percent of afterglows have a break that can be an adiabatic jet-break, in the sense that there is one variant of the forward-shock emission from a collimated outflow model that can account for both the pre- and post-break flux power-law decay indices, given the measured X-ray spectral slope. If allowance is made for a steady energy injection into the forward-shock, then another 56 percent of X-ray afterglows have a light-curve break that can be explained with a jet-break. The remaining 12 percent that are not jet-breaks, as well as the existence of two breaks in 19 afterglows (out of which only one can be a jet-break), suggest that some X-ray breaks arise from a sudden change in the rate at which energy is added to the blast-wave, and it may well be that a larger fraction of X-ray light-curve breaks are generated by that mechanism. To test the above two mechanisms for afterglow light-curve breaks, we derive comprehensive analytical results for the dynamics of outflows undergoing energy injection and for their light-curves, including closure relations for inverse-Compton afterglows and for the emission from spreading jets interacting with an wind-like ambient medium.
The origin of the X-ray afterglows of gamma-ray bursts has regularly been debated. We fit both the fireball-shock and millisecond-magnetar models of gamma-ray bursts to the X-ray data of GRB 130603B and 140903A. We use Bayesian model selection to answer the question of which model best explains the data. This is dependent on the maximum allowed non-rotating neutron star mass $M_{textrm{TOV}}$, which depends solely on the unknown nuclear equation of state. We show that the data for GRB140903A favours the millisecond-magnetar model for all possible equations of state, while the data for GRB130603B favours the millisecond-magnetar model if $M_{textrm{TOV}} gtrsim 2.3 M_{odot}$. If $M_{textrm{TOV}} lesssim 2.3 M_{odot}$, the data for GRB130603B supports the fireball-shock model. We discuss implications of this result in regards to the nuclear equation of state and the prospect of gravitational-wave emission from newly-born millisecond magnetars.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
