Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userA Single-Timescale Stochastic Bilevel Optimization Method
132
0
0.0
(
0
)
Added by
Tianyi Chen
Publication date
2021
fields
Informatics Engineering
and research's language is
English
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
Stochastic bilevel optimization generalizes the classic stochastic optimization from the minimization of a single objective to the minimization of an objective function that depends the solution of another optimization problem. Recently, stochastic bilevel optimization is regaining popularity in emerging machine learning applications such as hyper-parameter optimization and model-agnostic meta learning. To solve this class of stochastic optimization problems, existing methods require either double-loop or two-timescale updates, which are sometimes less efficient. This paper develops a new optimization method for a class of stochastic bilevel problems that we term Single-Timescale stochAstic BiLevEl optimization (STABLE) method. STABLE runs in a single loop fashion, and uses a single-timescale update with a fixed batch size. To achieve an $epsilon$-stationary point of the bilevel problem, STABLE requires ${cal O}(epsilon^{-2})$ samples in total; and to achieve an $epsilon$-optimal solution in the strongly convex case, STABLE requires ${cal O}(epsilon^{-1})$ samples. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first bilevel optimization algorithm achieving the same order of sample complexity as the stochastic gradient descent method for the single-level stochastic optimization.
rate research
Read More
This paper proposes a new algorithm -- the underline{S}ingle-timescale Dounderline{u}ble-momentum underline{St}ochastic underline{A}pproxunderline{i}matiounderline{n} (SUSTAIN) -- for tackling stochastic unconstrained bilevel optimization problems. We focus on bilevel problems where the lower level subproblem is strongly-convex and the upper level objective function is smooth. Unlike prior works which rely on emph{two-timescale} or emph{double loop} techniques, we design a stochastic momentum-assisted gradient estimator for both the upper and lower level updates. The latter allows us to control the error in the stochastic gradient updates due to inaccurate solution to both subproblems. If the upper objective function is smooth but possibly non-convex, we show that {aname}~requires $mathcal{O}(epsilon^{-3/2})$ iterations (each using ${cal O}(1)$ samples) to find an $epsilon$-stationary solution. The $epsilon$-stationary solution is defined as the point whose squared norm of the gradient of the outer function is less than or equal to $epsilon$. The total number of stochastic gradient samples required for the upper and lower level objective functions matches the best-known complexity for single-level stochastic gradient algorithms. We also analyze the case when the upper level objective function is strongly-convex.
In this paper, we consider non-convex stochastic bilevel optimization (SBO) problems that have many applications in machine learning. Although numerous studies have proposed stochastic algorithms for solving these problems, they are limited in two perspectives: (i) their sample complexities are high, which do not match the state-of-the-art result for non-convex stochastic optimization; (ii) their algorithms are tailored to problems with only one lower-level problem. When there are many lower-level problems, it could be prohibitive to process all these lower-level problems at each iteration. To address these limitations, this paper proposes fast randomized stochastic algorithms for non-convex SBO problems. First, we present a stochastic method for non-convex SBO with only one lower problem and establish its sample complexity of $O(1/epsilon^3)$ for finding an $epsilon$-stationary point under Lipschitz continuous conditions of stochastic oracles, matching the lower bound for stochastic smooth non-convex optimization. Second, we present a randomized stochastic method for non-convex SBO with $m>1$ lower level problems (multi-task SBO) by processing a constant number of lower problems at each iteration, and establish its sample complexity no worse than $O(m/epsilon^3)$, which could be a better complexity than that of simply processing all $m$ lower problems at each iteration. Lastly, we establish even faster convergence results for gradient-dominant functions. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work considering multi-task SBO and developing state-of-the-art sample complexity results.
Sparsity-inducing regularization problems are ubiquitous in machine learning applications, ranging from feature selection to model compression. In this paper, we present a novel stochastic method -- Orthant Based Proximal Stochastic Gradient Method (OBProx-SG) -- to solve perhaps the most popular instance, i.e., the l1-regularized problem. The OBProx-SG method contains two steps: (i) a proximal stochastic gradient step to predict a support cover of the solution; and (ii) an orthant step to aggressively enhance the sparsity level via orthant face projection. Compared to the state-of-the-art methods, e.g., Prox-SG, RDA and Prox-SVRG, the OBProx-SG not only converges to the global optimal solutions (in convex scenario) or the stationary points (in non-convex scenario), but also promotes the sparsity of the solutions substantially. Particularly, on a large number of convex problems, OBProx-SG outperforms the existing methods comprehensively in the aspect of sparsity exploration and objective values. Moreover, the experiments on non-convex deep neural networks, e.g., MobileNetV1 and ResNet18, further demonstrate its superiority by achieving the solutions of much higher sparsity without sacrificing generalization accuracy.
This paper studies bilevel polynomial optimization problems. To solve them, we give a method based on polynomial optimization relaxations. Each relaxation is obtained from the Kurash-Kuhn-Tucker (KKT) conditions for the lower level optimization and the exchange technique for semi-infinite programming. For KKT conditions, Lagrange multipliers are represented as polynomial or rational functions. The Moment-SOS relaxations are used to solve the polynomial optimizattion relaxations. Under some general assumptions, we prove the convergence of the algorithm for solving bilevel polynomial optimization problems. Numerical experiments are presented to show the efficiency of the method.
Stochastic convex optimization problems with expectation constraints (SOECs) are encountered in statistics and machine learning, business, and engineering. In data-rich environments, the SOEC objective and constraints contain expectations defined with respect to large datasets. Therefore, efficient algorithms for solving such SOECs need to limit the fraction of data points that they use, which we refer to as algorithmic data complexity. Recent stochastic first order methods exhibit low data complexity when handling SOECs but guarantee near-feasibility and near-optimality only at convergence. These methods may thus return highly infeasible solutions when heuristically terminated, as is often the case, due to theoretical convergence criteria being highly conservative. This issue limits the use of first order methods in several applications where the SOEC constraints encode implementation requirements. We design a stochastic feasible level set method (SFLS) for SOECs that has low data complexity and emphasizes feasibility before convergence. Specifically, our level-set method solves a root-finding problem by calling a novel first order oracle that computes a stochastic upper bound on the level-set function by extending mirror descent and online validation techniques. We establish that SFLS maintains a high-probability feasible solution at each root-finding iteration and exhibits favorable iteration complexity compared to state-of-the-art deterministic feasible level set and stochastic subgradient methods. Numerical experiments on three diverse applications validate the low data complexity of SFLS relative to the former approach and highlight how SFLS finds feasible solutions with small optimality gaps significantly faster than the latter method.
suggested questions
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
