Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userIn-Order Chart-Based Constituent Parsing
140
0
0.0
(
0
)
Added by
Yang Wei
Publication date
2021
fields
Informatics Engineering
and research's language is
English
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
We propose a novel in-order chart-based model for constituent parsing. Compared with previous CKY-style and top-down models, our model gains advantages from in-order traversal of a tree (rich features, lookahead information and high efficiency) and makes a better use of structural knowledge by encoding the history of decisions. Experiments on the Penn Treebank show that our model outperforms previous chart-based models and achieves competitive performance compared with other discriminative single models.
rate research
Read More
Syntactic and semantic parsing has been investigated for decades, which is one primary topic in the natural language processing community. This article aims for a brief survey on this topic. The parsing community includes many tasks, which are difficult to be covered fully. Here we focus on two of the most popular formalizations of parsing: constituent parsing and dependency parsing. Constituent parsing is majorly targeted to syntactic analysis, and dependency parsing can handle both syntactic and semantic analysis. This article briefly reviews the representative models of constituent parsing and dependency parsing, and also dependency graph parsing with rich semantics. Besides, we also review the closely-related topics such as cross-domain, cross-lingual and joint parsing models, parser application as well as corpus development of parsing in the article.
Graph-based methods are popular in dependency parsing for decades. Recently, citet{yang2021headed} propose a headed span-based method. Both of them score all possible trees and globally find the highest-scoring tree. In this paper, we combine these two kinds of methods, designing several dynamic programming algorithms for joint inference. Experiments show the effectiveness of our proposed methodsfootnote{Our code is publicly available at url{https://github.com/sustcsonglin/span-based-dependency-parsing}.}.
Most of the unsupervised dependency parsers are based on first-order probabilistic generative models that only consider local parent-child information. Inspired by second-order supervised dependency parsing, we proposed a second-order extension of unsupervised neural dependency models that incorporate grandparent-child or sibling information. We also propose a novel design of the neural parameterization and optimization methods of the dependency models. In second-order models, the number of grammar rules grows cubically with the increase of vocabulary size, making it difficult to train lexicalized models that may contain thousands of words. To circumvent this problem while still benefiting from both second-order parsing and lexicalization, we use the agreement-based learning framework to jointly train a second-order unlexicalized model and a first-order lexicalized model. Experiments on multiple datasets show the effectiveness of our second-order models compared with recent state-of-the-art methods. Our joint model achieves a 10% improvement over the previous state-of-the-art parser on the full WSJ test set
We propose a novel linearization of a constituent tree, together with a new locally normalized model. For each split point in a sentence, our model computes the normalizer on all spans ending with that split point, and then predicts a tree span from them. Compared with global models, our model is fast and parallelizable. Different from previous local models, our linearization method is tied on the spans directly and considers more local features when performing span prediction, which is more interpretable and effective. Experiments on PTB (95.8 F1) and CTB (92.4 F1) show that our model significantly outperforms existing local models and efficiently achieves competitive results with global models.
We propose a headed span-based method for projective dependency parsing. In a projective tree, the subtree rooted at each word occurs in a contiguous sequence (i.e., span) in the surface order, we call the span-headword pair textit{headed span}. In this view, a projective tree can be regarded as a collection of headed spans. It is similar to the case in constituency parsing since a constituency tree can be regarded as a collection of constituent spans. Span-based methods decompose the score of a constituency tree sorely into the score of constituent spans and use the CYK algorithm for global training and exact inference, obtaining state-of-the-art results in constituency parsing. Inspired by them, we decompose the score of a dependency tree into the score of headed spans. We use neural networks to score headed spans and design a novel $O(n^3)$ dynamic programming algorithm to enable global training and exact inference. We evaluate our method on PTB, CTB, and UD, achieving state-of-the-art or comparable results.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
