Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userBlocked and Hierarchical Disentangled Representation From Information Theory Perspective
71
0
0.0
(
0
)
Added by
Ziwen Liu
Publication date
2021
fields
Informatics Engineering
and research's language is
English
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
We propose a novel and theoretical model, blocked and hierarchical variational autoencoder (BHiVAE), to get better-disentangled representation. It is well known that information theory has an excellent explanatory meaning for the network, so we start to solve the disentanglement problem from the perspective of information theory. BHiVAE mainly comes from the information bottleneck theory and information maximization principle. Our main idea is that (1) Neurons block not only one neuron node is used to represent attribute, which can contain enough information; (2) Create a hierarchical structure with different attributes on different layers, so that we can segment the information within each layer to ensure that the final representation is disentangled. Furthermore, we present supervised and unsupervised BHiVAE, respectively, where the difference is mainly reflected in the separation of information between different blocks. In supervised BHiVAE, we utilize the label information as the standard to separate blocks. In unsupervised BHiVAE, without extra information, we use the Total Correlation (TC) measure to achieve independence, and we design a new prior distribution of the latent space to guide the representation learning. It also exhibits excellent disentanglement results in experiments and superior classification accuracy in representation learning.
rate research
Read More
We introduce algorithmic information theory, also known as the theory of Kolmogorov complexity. We explain the main concepts of this quantitative approach to defining `information. We discuss the extent to which Kolmogorovs and Shannons information theory have a common purpose, and where they are fundamentally different. We indicate how recent developments within the theory allow one to formally distinguish between `structural (meaningful) and `random information as measured by the Kolmogorov structure function, which leads to a mathematical formalization of Occams razor in inductive inference. We end by discussing some of the philosophical implications of the theory.
The information bottleneck (IB) method is a technique for extracting information that is relevant for predicting the target random variable from the source random variable, which is typically implemented by optimizing the IB Lagrangian that balances the compression and prediction terms. However, the IB Lagrangian is hard to optimize, and multiple trials for tuning values of Lagrangian multiplier are required. Moreover, we show that the prediction performance strictly decreases as the compression gets stronger during optimizing the IB Lagrangian. In this paper, we implement the IB method from the perspective of supervised disentangling. Specifically, we introduce Disentangled Information Bottleneck (DisenIB) that is consistent on compressing source maximally without target prediction performance loss (maximum compression). Theoretical and experimental results demonstrate that our method is consistent on maximum compression, and performs well in terms of generalization, robustness to adversarial attack, out-of-distribution detection, and supervised disentangling.
Recently, the partial information decomposition emerged as a promising framework for identifying the meaningful components of the information contained in a joint distribution. Its adoption and practical application, however, have been stymied by the lack of a generally-accepted method of quantifying its components. Here, we briefly discuss the bivariate (two-source) partial information decomposition and two implicitly directional interpretations used to intuitively motivate alternative component definitions. Drawing parallels with secret key agreement rates from information-theoretic cryptography, we demonstrate that these intuitions are mutually incompatible and suggest that this underlies the persistence of competing definitions and interpretations. Having highlighted this hitherto unacknowledged issue, we outline several possible solutions.
We show state-of-the-art word representation learning methods maximize an objective function that is a lower bound on the mutual information between different parts of a word sequence (i.e., a sentence). Our formulation provides an alternative perspective that unifies classical word embedding models (e.g., Skip-gram) and modern contextual embeddings (e.g., BERT, XLNet). In addition to enhancing our theoretical understanding of these methods, our derivation leads to a principled framework that can be used to construct new self-supervised tasks. We provide an example by drawing inspirations from related methods based on mutual information maximization that have been successful in computer vision, and introduce a simple self-supervised objective that maximizes the mutual information between a global sentence representation and n-grams in the sentence. Our analysis offers a holistic view of representation learning methods to transfer knowledge and translate progress across multiple domains (e.g., natural language processing, computer vision, audio processing).
Constraints on entropies are considered to be the laws of information theory. Even though the pursuit of their discovery has been a central theme of research in information theory, the algorithmic aspects of constraints on entropies remain largely unexplored. Here, we initiate an investigation of decision problems about constraints on entropies by placing several different such problems into levels of the arithmetical hierarchy. We establish the following results on checking the validity over all almost-entropic functions: first, validity of a Boolean information constraint arising from a monotone Boolean formula is co-recursively enumerable; second, validity of tight conditional information constraints is in $Pi^0_3$. Furthermore, under some restrictions, validity of conditional information constraints with slack is in $Sigma^0_2$, and validity of information inequality constraints involving max is Turing equivalent to validity of information inequality constraints (with no max involved). We also prove that the classical implication problem for conditional independence statements is co-recursively enumerable.
suggested questions
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
