Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userOut-of-distribution Prediction with Invariant Risk Minimization: The Limitation and An Effective Fix
100
0
0.0
(
0
)
Added by
Ruocheng Guo
Publication date
2021
fields
Informatics Engineering
and research's language is
English
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
This work considers the out-of-distribution (OOD) prediction problem where (1)~the training data are from multiple domains and (2)~the test domain is unseen in the training. DNNs fail in OOD prediction because they are prone to pick up spurious correlations. Recently, Invariant Risk Minimization (IRM) is proposed to address this issue. Its effectiveness has been demonstrated in the colored MNIST experiment. Nevertheless, we find that the performance of IRM can be dramatically degraded under emph{strong $Lambda$ spuriousness} -- when the spurious correlation between the spurious features and the class label is strong due to the strong causal influence of their common cause, the domain label, on both of them (see Fig. 1). In this work, we try to answer the questions: why does IRM fail in the aforementioned setting? Why does IRM work for the original colored MNIST dataset? How can we fix this problem of IRM? Then, we propose a simple and effective approach to fix the problem of IRM. We combine IRM with conditional distribution matching to avoid a specific type of spurious correlation under strong $Lambda$ spuriousness. Empirically, we design a series of semi synthetic datasets -- the colored MNIST plus, which exposes the problems of IRM and demonstrates the efficacy of the proposed method.
rate research
Read More
Empirical Risk Minimization (ERM) based machine learning algorithms have suffered from weak generalization performance on data obtained from out-of-distribution (OOD). To address this problem, Invariant Risk Minimization (IRM) objective was suggested to find invariant optimal predictor which is less affected by the changes in data distribution. However, even with such progress, IRMv1, the practical formulation of IRM, still shows performance degradation when there are not enough training data, and even fails to generalize to OOD, if the number of spurious correlations is larger than the number of environments. In this paper, to address such problems, we propose a novel meta-learning based approach for IRM. In this method, we do not assume the linearity of classifier for the ease of optimization, and solve ideal bi-level IRM objective with Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning (MAML) framework. Our method is more robust to the data with spurious correlations and can provide an invariant optimal classifier even when data from each distribution are scarce. In experiments, we demonstrate that our algorithm not only has better OOD generalization performance than IRMv1 and all IRM variants, but also addresses the weakness of IRMv1 with improved stability.
We introduce Invariant Risk Minimization (IRM), a learning paradigm to estimate invariant correlations across multiple training distributions. To achieve this goal, IRM learns a data representation such that the optimal classifier, on top of that data representation, matches for all training distributions. Through theory and experiments, we show how the invariances learned by IRM relate to the causal structures governing the data and enable out-of-distribution generalization.
The standard risk minimization paradigm of machine learning is brittle when operating in environments whose test distributions are different from the training distribution due to spurious correlations. Training on data from many environments and finding invariant predictors reduces the effect of spurious features by concentrating models on features that have a causal relationship with the outcome. In this work, we pose such invariant risk minimization as finding the Nash equilibrium of an ensemble game among several environments. By doing so, we develop a simple training algorithm that uses best response dynamics and, in our experiments, yields similar or better empirical accuracy with much lower variance than the challenging bi-level optimization problem of Arjovsky et al. (2019). One key theoretical contribution is showing that the set of Nash equilibria for the proposed game are equivalent to the set of invariant predictors for any finite number of environments, even with nonlinear classifiers and transformations. As a result, our method also retains the generalization guarantees to a large set of environments shown in Arjovsky et al. (2019). The proposed algorithm adds to the collection of successful game-theoretic machine learning algorithms such as generative adversarial networks.
Distributional shift is one of the major obstacles when transferring machine learning prediction systems from the lab to the real world. To tackle this problem, we assume that variation across training domains is representative of the variation we might encounter at test time, but also that shifts at test time may be more extreme in magnitude. In particular, we show that reducing differences in risk across training domains can reduce a models sensitivity to a wide range of extreme distributional shifts, including the challenging setting where the input contains both causal and anti-causal elements. We motivate this approach, Risk Extrapolation (REx), as a form of robust optimization over a perturbation set of extrapolated domains (MM-REx), and propose a penalty on the variance of training risks (V-REx) as a simpler variant. We prove that variants of REx can recover the causal mechanisms of the targets, while also providing some robustness to changes in the input distribution (covariate shift). By appropriately trading-off robustness to causally induced distributional shifts and covariate shift, REx is able to outperform alternative methods such as Invariant Risk Minimization in situations where these types of shift co-occur.
We show that the Invariant Risk Minimization (IRM) formulation of Arjovsky et al. (2019) can fail to capture natural invariances, at least when used in its practical linear form, and even on very simple problems which directly follow the motivating examples for IRM. This can lead to worse generalization on new environments, even when compared to unconstrained ERM. The issue stems from a significant gap between the linear variant (as in their concrete method IRMv1) and the full non-linear IRM formulation. Additionally, even when capturing the right invariances, we show that it is possible for IRM to learn a sub-optimal predictor, due to the loss function not being invariant across environments. The issues arise even when measuring invariance on the population distributions, but are exacerbated by the fact that IRM is extremely fragile to sampling.
suggested questions
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
