Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userThe Generalized Flanders Theorem in Unit-regular Rings
61
0
0.0
(
0
)
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
Let R be a unit-regular ring, and let a,b,c in R satisfy aba=aca. If ac and ba are group invertible, we prove that ac is similar to ba. Furthermore, if ac and ba are Drazin invertible, then their Drazin inverses are similar. For any ntimes n complex matrices A,B,C with ABA = ACA ,we prove that AC and BA are similar if and only if their k-powers have the same rank. These generalize the known Flanders theorem proved by Hartwig.
rate research
Read More
We show that any semiartinian *-regular ring R is unit-regular; if, in addition, R is subdirectly irreducible then it admits a representation within some inner product space.
Given a subdirectly irreducible *-regular ring R, we show that R is a homomorphic image of a regular *-subring of an ultraproduct of the (simple) eRe, e in the minimal ideal of R; moreover, R (with unit) is directly finite if all eRe are unit-regular. Finally, unit-regularity is shown for every member of the variety generated by artinian *-regular rings (endowed with unit and pseudo-inversion).
We survey recent progress on the realization problem for von Neumann regular rings, which asks whether every countable conical refinement monoid can be realized as the monoid of isoclasses of finitely generated projective right $R$-modules over a von Neumann regular ring $R$.
We show that a von Neumann regular ring with involution is directly finite provided that it admits a representation as a ring of endomorphisms (the involution given by taking adjoints) of a vector space endowed with a non-degenerate orthosymmetric sesquilinear form.
In a semiprime ring, von Neumann regular elements are determined by their inner inverses. In particular, for elements $a,b$ of a von Neumann regular ring $R$, $a=b$ if and only if $I(a)=I(b)$, where $I(x)$ denotes the set of inner inverses of $xin R$. We also prove that, in a semiprime ring, the same is true for reflexive inverses.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
