Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userConstraints on the properties of warm dark matter using the satellite galaxies of the Milky Way
105
0
0.0
(
0
)
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
The satellite galaxies of the Milky Way (MW) are effective probes of the underlying dark matter (DM) substructure, which is sensitive to the nature of the DM particle. In particular, a class of DM models have a power spectrum cut-off on the mass scale of dwarf galaxies and thus predict only small numbers of substructures below the cut-off mass. This makes the MW satellite system appealing to constrain the DM properties: feasible models must produce enough substructure to host the number of observed Galactic satellites. Here, we compare theoretical predictions of the abundance of DM substructure in thermal relic warm DM (WDM) models with estimates of the total satellite population of the MW. This produces conservative robust lower limits on the allowed mass, $m_mathrm{th}$, of the thermal relic WDM particle. As the abundance of satellite galaxies depends on the MW halo mass, we marginalize over the corresponding uncertainties and rule out $m_mathrm{th} leq 2.02, mathrm{keV}$ at 95 per cent confidence independently of assumptions about galaxy formation processes. Modelling some of these - in particular, the effect of reionization, which suppresses the formation of dwarf galaxies - strengthens our constraints on the DM properties and excludes models with $m_mathrm{th} leq 3.99, mathrm{keV}$ in our fiducial model. We also find that thermal relic models cannot produce enough satellites if the MW halo mass is $M_{200}leq 0.6times 10^{12}, mathrm{M_odot}$, which imposes a lower limit on the MW halo mass in CDM. We address several observational and theoretical uncertainties and discuss how improvements in these will strengthen the DM mass constraints.
rate research
Read More
We perform a comprehensive study of Milky Way (MW) satellite galaxies to constrain the fundamental properties of dark matter (DM). This analysis fully incorporates inhomogeneities in the spatial distribution and detectability of MW satellites and marginalizes over uncertainties in the mapping between galaxies and DM halos, the properties of the MW system, and the disruption of subhalos by the MW disk. Our results are consistent with the cold, collisionless DM paradigm and yield the strongest cosmological constraints to date on particle models of warm, interacting, and fuzzy dark matter. At $95%$ confidence, we report limits on (i) the mass of thermal relic warm DM, $m_{rm WDM} > 6.5 mathrm{keV}$ (free-streaming length, $lambda_{rm{fs}} lesssim 10,h^{-1} mathrm{kpc}$), (ii) the velocity-independent DM-proton scattering cross section, $sigma_{0} < 8.8times 10^{-29} mathrm{cm}^{2}$ for a $100 mathrm{MeV}$ DM particle mass (DM-proton coupling, $c_p lesssim (0.3 mathrm{GeV})^{-2}$), and (iii) the mass of fuzzy DM, $m_{phi}> 2.9 times 10^{-21} mathrm{eV}$ (de Broglie wavelength, $lambda_{rm{dB}} lesssim 0.5 mathrm{kpc}$). These constraints are complementary to other observational and laboratory constraints on DM properties.
A small fraction of thermalized dark radiation that transitions into cold dark matter (CDM) between big bang nucleosynthesis and matter-radiation equality can account for the entire dark matter relic density. Because of its transition from dark radiation, late-forming dark matter (LFDM) suppresses the growth of linear matter perturbations and imprints the oscillatory signatures of dark radiation perturbations on small scales. The cutoff scale in the linear matter power spectrum is set by the redshift $z_T$ of the phase transition; tracers of small-scale structure can therefore be used to infer the LFDM formation epoch. Here, we use a forward model of the Milky Way (MW) satellite galaxy population to address the question: How late can dark matter form? For dark radiation with strong self-interactions, which arises in theories of neutrinolike LFDM, we report $z_{T}>5.5times 10^6$ at $95%$ confidence based on the abundance of known MW satellite galaxies. This limit rigorously accounts for observational incompleteness corrections, marginalizes over uncertainties in the connection between dwarf galaxies and dark matter halos, and improves upon galaxy clustering and Lyman-$alpha$ forest constraints by nearly an order of magnitude. We show that this limit can also be interpreted as a lower bound on $z_T$ for LFDM that free-streams prior to its phase transition, although dedicated simulations will be needed to analyze this case in detail. Thus, dark matter created by a transition from dark radiation must form no later than one week after the big bang.
In the thermal dark matter (DM) paradigm, primordial interactions between DM and Standard Model particles are responsible for the observed DM relic density. In Boehm et al. (2014), we showed that weak-strength interactions between DM and radiation (photons or neutrinos) can erase small-scale density fluctuations, leading to a suppression of the matter power spectrum compared to the collisionless cold DM (CDM) model. This results in fewer DM subhaloes within Milky Way-like DM haloes, implying a reduction in the abundance of satellite galaxies. Here we use very high resolution N-body simulations to measure the dynamics of these subhaloes. We find that when interactions are included, the largest subhaloes are less concentrated than their counterparts in the collisionless CDM model and have rotation curves that match observational data, providing a new solution to the too big to fail problem.
The fact that dark matter (DM), thus far, has revealed itself only on scales of galaxies and larger, again thrusts onto astrophysics the opportunity and the responsibility to confront the age old mystery What is the nature of matter? By deriving basic data on the nature of DM - e.g., mass of its particle(s), present mean temperature, distribution in galaxies and other structures in the universe, and capacity for dissipational collapse - we will be uncovering the properties of the dominant species of matter in the universe and significantly extending the standard models of particle physics. Determining the mass of the DM particle to an order of magnitude would help to sort out the particle family to which it (or they) belongs. Beyond mass, there are issues of stability. The DM particle may be unstable with a measurable half-life, or it may become unstable after absorbing a certain amount of energy from collisions. In both cases it would contribute to the present hot dark matter component. Some key parameters of DM can most accurately be measured in the very nearby universe because DM dominates the mass in the outer Milky Way (MW), in other galaxies in the Local Group, and in the Local Group in its entirety. The presence and amount of DM can be quantified by study of dynamical processes observable in fine detail within these entities. Precise measurements of 3-D velocities for stars, coherent star streams, and stars in satellite stellar systems out to the edge of the Galaxy can reveal what is the shape, orientation, density law, and lumpiness of the dark matter halo as well as what is the total mass of the Galaxy?
We use the distribution of maximum circular velocities, $V_{max}$, of satellites in the Milky Way (MW) to constrain the virial mass, $M_{200}$, of the Galactic halo under an assumed prior of a $Lambda$CDM universe. This is done by analysing the subhalo populations of a large sample of halos found in the Millennium II cosmological simulation. The observation that the MW has at most three subhalos with $V_{max}ge30 km/s$ requires a halo mass $M_{200}le1.4times10^{12} M_odot$, while the existence of the Magellanic Clouds (assumed to have $V_{max}ge60 km/s$) requires $M_{200}ge1.0times10^{12} M_odot$. The first of these conditions is necessary to avoid the too-big-to-fail problem highlighted by Boylan-Kolchin et al., while the second stems from the observation that massive satellites like the Magellanic Clouds are rare. When combining both requirements, we find that the MW halo mass must lie in the range $0.25 le M_{200}/(10^{12} M_odot) le 1.4$ at $90%$ confidence. The gap in the abundance of Galactic satellites between $30 km/sle V_{max} le 60 km/s$ places our galaxy in the tail of the expected satellite distribution.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
