Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userMeasurements of the Hubble constant and cosmic curvature with quasars: ultra-compact radio structure and strong gravitational lensing
111
0
0.0
(
0
)
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
Although the Hubble constant $H_0$ and spatial curvature $Omega_{K}$ have been measured with very high precision, they still suffer from some tensions. In this paper, we propose an improved method to combine the observations of ultra-compact structure in radio quasars and strong gravitational lensing with quasars acting as background sources to determine $H_0$ and $Omega_{K}$ simultaneously. By applying the distance sum rule to the time-delay measurements of 7 strong lensing systems and 120 intermediate-luminosity quasars calibrated as standard rulers, we obtain stringent constraints on the Hubble constant ($H_0=78.3pm2.9 mathrm{~km~s^{-1}~Mpc^{-1}}$) and the cosmic curvature ($Omega_K=0.49pm0.24$). On the one hand, in the framework of a flat universe, the measured Hubble constant ($H_0=73.6^{+1.8}_{-1.6} mathrm{~km~s^{-1}~Mpc^{-1}}$) is strongly consistent with that derived from the local distance ladder, with a precision of 2%. On the other hand, if we use the local $H_0$ measurement as a prior, our results are marginally compatible with zero spatial curvature ($Omega_K=0.23^{+0.15}_{-0.17}$) and there is no significant deviation from a flat universe. Finally, we also evaluate whether strongly lensed quasars would produce robust constraints on $H_0$ and $Omega_{K}$ in the non-flat and flat $Lambda$CDM model if the compact radio structure measurements are available from VLBI observations.
rate research
Read More
Testing the distance-sum-rule in strong lensing systems provides an interesting method to determine the curvature parameter $Omega_k$ using more local objects. In this paper, we apply this method to a quite recent data set of strong lensing systems in combination with intermediate-luminosity quasars calibrated as standard rulers. In the framework of three types of lens models extensively used in strong lensing studies (SIS model, power-law spherical model, and extended power-law lens model), we show that the assumed lens model has a considerable impact on the cosmic curvature constraint, which is found to be compatible or marginally compatible with the flat case (depending on the lens model adopted). Analysis of low, intermediate and high-mass sub-samples defined according to the lens velocity dispersion demonstrates that, although it is not reasonable to characterize all lenses with a uniform model, such division has little impact on cosmic curvature inferred. Finally, thinking about future when massive surveys will provide their yields, we simulated a mock catalog of strong lensing systems expected to be seen by the LSST, together with a realistic catalog of quasars. We found that with about 16000 such systems, combined with the distance information provided by 500 compact milliarcsecond radio sources seen in future radio astronomical surveys, one would be able to constrain the cosmic curvature with an accuracy of $Delta Omega_ksimeq 10^{-3}$, which is comparable to the precision of textit{Planck} 2015 results.
Applying the distance sum rule in strong gravitational lensing (SGL) and type Ia supernova (SN Ia) observations, one can provide an interesting cosmological model-independent method to determine the cosmic curvature parameter $Omega_k$. In this paper, with the newly compiled data sets including 161 galactic-scale SGL systems and 1048 SN Ia data, we place constraints on $Omega_k$ within the framework of three types of lens models extensively used in SGL studies. Moreover, to investigate the effect of different mass lens samples on the results, we divide the SGL sample into three sub-samples based on the center velocity dispersion of intervening galaxies. In the singular isothermal sphere (SIS) and extended power-law lens models, a flat universe is supported with the uncertainty about 0.2, while a closed universe is preferred in the power-law lens model. We find that the choice of lens models and the classification of SGL data actually can influence the constraints on $Omega_k$ significantly.
We apply a tension metric $Q_textrm{UDM}$, the update difference in mean parameters, to understand the source of the difference in the measured Hubble constant $H_0$ inferred with cosmic microwave background lensing measurements from the Planck satellite ($H_0=67.9^{+1.1}_{-1.3}, mathrm{km/s/Mpc}$) and from the South Pole Telescope ($H_0=72.0^{+2.1}_{-2.5}, mathrm{km/s/Mpc}$) when both are combined with baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) measurements with priors on the baryon density (BBN). $Q_textrm{UDM}$ isolates the relevant parameter directions for tension or concordance where the two data sets are both informative, and aids in the identification of subsets of data that source the observed tension. With $Q_textrm{UDM}$, we uncover that the difference in $H_0$ is driven by the tension between Planck lensing and BAO+BBN, at probability-to-exceed of 6.6%. Most of this mild tension comes from the galaxy BAO measurements parallel to the line of sight. The redshift dependence of the parallel BAOs pulls both the matter density $Omega_m$ and $H_0$ high in $Lambda$CDM, but these parameter anomalies are usually hidden when the BAO measurements are combined with other cosmological data sets with much stronger $Omega_m$ constraints.
Using a new sub-sample of observed strong gravitational lens systems, for the first time, we present the equation for the angular diameter distance in the $y$-redshift scenario for cosmography and use it to test the cosmographic parameters. In addition, we also use the observational Hubble data from cosmic chronometers and a Joint analysis of both data is performed. Among the most important conclusions are that this new analysis for cosmography using Strong Lensing Systems is equally competitive to constrain the cosmographic parameters as others presented in literature. Additionally, we present the reconstruction of the effective equation of state inferred from our samples, showing that at $z=0$ those reconstructions from Strong Lensing Systems and Joint analysis are in concordance with the standard model of cosmology.
In this paper, we place constraints on four alternative cosmological models under the assumption of the spatial flatness of the Universe: CPL, EDE, GCG and MPC. A new compilation of 120 compact radio quasars observed by very-long-baseline interferometry, which represents a type of new cosmological standard rulers, are used to test these cosmological models. Our results show that the fits on CPL obtained from the quasar sample are well consistent with those obtained from BAO. For other cosmological models considered, quasars provide constraints in agreement with those derived with other standard probes at $1sigma$ confidence level. Moreover, the results obtained from other statistical methods including Figure of Merit, $Om(z)$ and statefinder diagnostics indicate that: (1) Radio quasar standard ruler could provide better statistical constraints than BAO for all cosmological models considered, which suggests its potential to act as a powerful complementary probe to BAO and galaxy clusters. (2) Turning to $Om(z)$ diagnostics, CPL, GCG and EDE models can not be distinguished from each other at the present epoch. (3) In the framework of statefinder diagnostics, MPC and EDE will deviate from $rm{Lambda}$CDM model in the near future, while GCG model cannot be distinguished from $rm{Lambda}$CDM model unless much higher precision observations are available.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
