Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userCooperative-Competitive Reinforcement Learning with History-Dependent Rewards
237
0
0.0
(
0
)
Added by
Keyang He
Publication date
2020
fields
Informatics Engineering
and research's language is
English
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
Consider a typical organization whose worker agents seek to collectively cooperate for its general betterment. However, each individual agent simultaneously seeks to act to secure a larger chunk than its co-workers of the annual increment in compensation, which usually comes from a {em fixed} pot. As such, the individual agent in the organization must cooperate and compete. Another feature of many organizations is that a worker receives a bonus, which is often a fraction of previous years total profit. As such, the agent derives a reward that is also partly dependent on historical performance. How should the individual agent decide to act in this context? Few methods for the mixed cooperative-competitive setting have been presented in recent years, but these are challenged by problem domains whose reward functions do not depend on the current state and action only. Recent deep multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) methods using long short-term memory (LSTM) may be used, but these adopt a joint perspective to the interaction or require explicit exchange of information among the agents to promote cooperation, which may not be possible under competition. In this paper, we first show that the agents decision-making problem can be modeled as an interactive partially observable Markov decision process (I-POMDP) that captures the dynamic of a history-dependent reward. We present an interactive advantage actor-critic method (IA2C$^+$), which combines the independent advantage actor-critic network with a belief filter that maintains a belief distribution over other agents models. Empirical results show that IA2C$^+$ learns the optimal policy faster and more robustly than several other baselines including one that uses a LSTM, even when attributed models are incorrect.
rate research
Read More
Training a multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) algorithm is more challenging than training a single-agent reinforcement learning algorithm, because the result of a multi-agent task strongly depends on the complex interactions among agents and their interactions with a stochastic and dynamic environment. We propose an algorithm that boosts MARL training using the biased action information of other agents based on a friend-or-foe concept. For a cooperative and competitive environment, there are generally two groups of agents: cooperative-agents and competitive-agents. In the proposed algorithm, each agent updates its value function using its own action and the biased action information of other agents in the two groups. The biased joint action of cooperative agents is computed as the sum of their actual joint action and the imaginary cooperative joint action, by assuming all the cooperative agents jointly maximize the target agents value function. The biased joint action of competitive agents can be computed similarly. Each agent then updates its own value function using the biased action information, resulting in a biased value function and corresponding biased policy. Subsequently, the biased policy of each agent is inevitably subjected to recommend an action to cooperate and compete with other agents, thereby introducing more active interactions among agents and enhancing the MARL policy learning. We empirically demonstrate that our algorithm outperforms existing algorithms in various mixed cooperative-competitive environments. Furthermore, the introduced biases gradually decrease as the training proceeds and the correction based on the imaginary assumption vanishes.
Action and observation delays exist prevalently in the real-world cyber-physical systems which may pose challenges in reinforcement learning design. It is particularly an arduous task when handling multi-agent systems where the delay of one agent could spread to other agents. To resolve this problem, this paper proposes a novel framework to deal with delays as well as the non-stationary training issue of multi-agent tasks with model-free deep reinforcement learning. We formally define the Delay-Aware Markov Game that incorporates the delays of all agents in the environment. To solve Delay-Aware Markov Games, we apply centralized training and decentralized execution that allows agents to use extra information to ease the non-stationarity issue of the multi-agent systems during training, without the need of a centralized controller during execution. Experiments are conducted in multi-agent particle environments including cooperative communication, cooperative navigation, and competitive experiments. We also test the proposed algorithm in traffic scenarios that require coordination of all autonomous vehicles to show the practical value of delay-awareness. Results show that the proposed delay-aware multi-agent reinforcement learning algorithm greatly alleviates the performance degradation introduced by delay. Codes and demo videos are available at: https://github.com/baimingc/delay-aware-MARL.
We study deep reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms with delayed rewards. In many real-world tasks, instant rewards are often not readily accessible or even defined immediately after the agent performs actions. In this work, we first formally define the environment with delayed rewards and discuss the challenges raised due to the non-Markovian nature of such environments. Then, we introduce a general off-policy RL framework with a new Q-function formulation that can handle the delayed rewards with theoretical convergence guarantees. For practical tasks with high dimensional state spaces, we further introduce the HC-decomposition rule of the Q-function in our framework which naturally leads to an approximation scheme that helps boost the training efficiency and stability. We finally conduct extensive experiments to demonstrate the superior performance of our algorithms over the existing work and their variants.
Learning effective policies for sparse objectives is a key challenge in Deep Reinforcement Learning (RL). A common approach is to design task-related dense rewards to improve task learnability. While such rewards are easily interpreted, they rely on heuristics and domain expertise. Alternate approaches that train neural networks to discover dense surrogate rewards avoid heuristics, but are high-dimensional, black-box solutions offering little interpretability. In this paper, we present a method that discovers dense rewards in the form of low-dimensional symbolic trees - thus making them more tractable for analysis. The trees use simple functional operators to map an agents observations to a scalar reward, which then supervises the policy gradient learning of a neural network policy. We test our method on continuous action spaces in Mujoco and discrete action spaces in Atari and Pygame environments. We show that the discovered dense rewards are an effective signal for an RL policy to solve the benchmark tasks. Notably, we significantly outperform a widely used, contemporary neural-network based reward-discovery algorithm in all environments considered.
Reinforcement learning agents that operate in diverse and complex environments can benefit from the structured decomposition of their behavior. Often, this is addressed in the context of hierarchical reinforcement learning, where the aim is to decompose a policy into lower-level primitives or options, and a higher-level meta-policy that triggers the appropriate behaviors for a given situation. However, the meta-policy must still produce appropriate decisions in all states. In this work, we propose a policy design that decomposes into primitives, similarly to hierarchical reinforcement learning, but without a high-level meta-policy. Instead, each primitive can decide for themselves whether they wish to act in the current state. We use an information-theoretic mechanism for enabling this decentralized decision: each primitive chooses how much information it needs about the current state to make a decision and the primitive that requests the most information about the current state acts in the world. The primitives are regularized to use as little information as possible, which leads to natural competition and specialization. We experimentally demonstrate that this policy architecture improves over both flat and hierarchical policies in terms of generalization.
suggested questions
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
