Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new user$t$-Resilient $k$-Immediate Snapshot and its Relation with Agreement Problems
68
0
0.0
(
0
)
Added by
Sergio Rajsbaum
Publication date
2020
fields
Informatics Engineering
and research's language is
English
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
An immediate snapshot object is a high level communication object, built on top of a read/write distributed system in which all except one processes may crash. It allows a process to write a value and obtain a set of values that represent a snapshot of the values written to the object, occurring immediately after the write step. Considering an $n$-process model in which up to $t$ processes may crash, this paper introduces first the $k$-resilient immediate snapshot object, which is a natural generalization of the basic immediate snapshot (which corresponds to the case $k=t=n-1$). In addition to the set containment properties of the basic immediate snapshot, a $k$-resilient immediate snapshot object requires that each set returned to a process contains at least $(n-k)$ pairs. The paper first shows that, for $k,t<n-1$, $k$-resilient immediate snapshot is impossible in asynchronous read/write systems. %Then the paper investigates the space of objects that %are impossible to solve in $n$-process $t$-crash read/write systems. Then the paper investigates a model of computation where the processes communicate with each other by accessing $k$-immediate snapshot objects, and shows that this model is stronger than the $t$-crash model. Considering the space of $x$-set agreement problems (which are impossible to solve in systems such that $xleq t$), the paper shows then that $x$-set agreement can be solved in read/write systems enriched with $k$-immediate snapshot objects for $x=max(1,t+k-(n-2))$. It also shows that, in these systems, $k$-resilient immediate snapshot and consensus are equivalent when $1leq t<n/2$ and $tleq kleq (n-1)-t$. Hence, %thanks to the problem map it provides, the paper establishes strong relations linking fundamental distributed computing objects (one related to communication, the other to agreement), which are impossible to solve in pure read/write systems.
rate research
Read More
We show that asynchronous $t$ faults Byzantine system is equivalent to asynchronous $t$-resilient system, where unbeknownst to all, the private inputs of at most $t$ processors were altered and installed by a malicious oracle. The immediate ramification is that dealing with asynchronous Byzantine systems does not call for new topological methods, as was recently employed by various researchers: Asynchronous Byzantine is a standard asynchronous system with an input caveat. It also shows that two recent independent investigations of vector $epsilon$-agreement in the Byzantine model, and then in the fail-stop model, one was superfluous - in these problems the change of $t$ inputs allowed in the Byzantine has no effect compared to the fail-stop case. This result was motivated by the aim of casting any asynchronous system as a synchronous system where all processors are correct and it is the communication substrate in the form of message-adversary that misbehaves. Thus, in addition, we get such a characterization for the asynchronous Byzantine system.
A task is a distributed problem for $n$ processes, in which each process starts with a private input value, communicates with other processes, and eventually decides an output value. A task is colorless if each process can adopt the input or output value of another process. Colorless tasks are well studied in the non-anonymous shared-memory model where each process has a distinct identifier that can be used to access a single-writer/multi-reader shared register. In the anonymous case, where processes have no identifiers and communicate through multi-writer/multi-reader registers, there is a recent topological characterization of the colorless tasks that are solvable when any number of asynchronous processes may crash. In this paper we study the case where at most $t$ processes may crash, where $1 le t < n$. We prove that a colorless task is $t$-resilient solvable non-anonymously if and only if it is $t$-resilient solvable anonymously. This implies a complete characterization of colorless anonymous t-resilient asynchronous task computability.
For mitigating Byzantine behaviors in federated learning (FL), most state-of-the-art approaches, such as Bulyan, tend to leverage the similarity of updates from the benign clients. However, in many practical FL scenarios, data is non-IID across clients, thus the updates received from even the benign clients are quite dissimilar. Hence, using similarity based methods result in wasted opportunities to train a model from interesting non-IID data, and also slower model convergence. We propose DiverseFL to overcome this challenge in heterogeneous data distribution settings. Rather than comparing each clients update with other client updates to detect Byzantine clients, DiverseFL compares each clients update with a guiding update of that client. Any client whose update diverges from its associated guiding update is then tagged as a Byzantine node. The FL server in DiverseFL computes the guiding update in every round for each client over a small sample of the clients local data that is received only once before start of the training. However, sharing even a small sample of clients data with the FL server can compromise clients data privacy needs. To tackle this challenge, DiverseFL creates a Trusted Execution Environment (TEE)-based enclave to receive each clients sample and to compute its guiding updates. TEE provides a hardware assisted verification and attestation to each client that its data is not leaked outside of TEE. Through experiments involving neural networks, benchmark datasets and popular Byzantine attacks, we demonstrate that DiverseFL not only performs Byzantine mitigation quite effectively, it also almost matches the performance of OracleSGD, where the server only aggregates the updates from the benign clients.
Consider a distributed system with $n$ processors out of which $f$ can be Byzantine faulty. In the approximate agreement task, each processor $i$ receives an input value $x_i$ and has to decide on an output value $y_i$ such that - the output values are in the convex hull of the non-faulty processors input values, - the output values are within distance $d$ of each other. Classically, the values are assumed to be from an $m$-dimensional Euclidean space, where $m ge 1$. In this work, we study the task in a discrete setting, where input values with some structure expressible as a graph. Namely, the input values are vertices of a finite graph $G$ and the goal is to output vertices that are within distance $d$ of each other in $G$, but still remain in the graph-induced convex hull of the input values. For $d=0$, the task reduces to consensus and cannot be solved with a deterministic algorithm in an asynchronous system even with a single crash fault. For any $d ge 1$, we show that the task is solvable in asynchronous systems when $G$ is chordal and $n > (omega+1)f$, where $omega$ is the clique number of~$G$. In addition, we give the first Byzantine-tolerant algorithm for a variant of lattice agreement. For synchronous systems, we show tight resilience bounds for the exact variants of these and related tasks over a large class of combinatorial structures.
In this paper we address Approximate Agreement problem in the Mobile Byzantine faults model. Our contribution is threefold. First, we propose the the first mapping from the existing variants of Mobile Byzantine models to the Mixed-Mode faults model.This mapping further help us to prove the correctness of class MSR (Mean-Subsequence-Reduce) Approximate Agreement algorithms in the Mobile Byzantine fault model, and is of independent interest. Secondly, we prove lower bounds for solving Approximate Agreement under all existing Mobile Byzantine faults models. Interestingly, these lower bounds are different from the static bounds. Finally, we propose matching upper bounds. Our paper is the first to link the Mobile Byzantine Faults models and the Mixed-Mode Faults models, and we advocate that a similar approach can be adopted in order to prove the correctness of other classical distributed building blocks (e.g. agreement, clock synchronization, interactive consistency etc) under Mobile Byzantine Faults model.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
