Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userHow Does GAN-based Semi-supervised Learning Work?
143
0
0.0
(
0
)
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
Generative adversarial networks (GANs) have been widely used and have achieved competitive results in semi-supervised learning. This paper theoretically analyzes how GAN-based semi-supervised learning (GAN-SSL) works. We first prove that, given a fixed generator, optimizing the discriminator of GAN-SSL is equivalent to optimizing that of supervised learning. Thus, the optimal discriminator in GAN-SSL is expected to be perfect on labeled data. Then, if the perfect discriminator can further cause the optimization objective to reach its theoretical maximum, the optimal generator will match the true data distribution. Since it is impossible to reach the theoretical maximum in practice, one cannot expect to obtain a perfect generator for generating data, which is apparently different from the objective of GANs. Furthermore, if the labeled data can traverse all connected subdomains of the data manifold, which is reasonable in semi-supervised classification, we additionally expect the optimal discriminator in GAN-SSL to also be perfect on unlabeled data. In conclusion, the minimax optimization in GAN-SSL will theoretically output a perfect discriminator on both labeled and unlabeled data by unexpectedly learning an imperfect generator, i.e., GAN-SSL can effectively improve the generalization ability of the discriminator by leveraging unlabeled information.
rate research
Read More
Recently proposed consistency-based Semi-Supervised Learning (SSL) methods such as the $Pi$-model, temporal ensembling, the mean teacher, or the virtual adversarial training, have advanced the state of the art in several SSL tasks. These methods can typically reach performances that are comparable to their fully supervised counterparts while using only a fraction of labelled examples. Despite these methodological advances, the understanding of these methods is still relatively limited. In this text, we analyse (variations of) the $Pi$-model in settings where analytically tractable results can be obtained. We establish links with Manifold Tangent Classifiers and demonstrate that the quality of the perturbations is key to obtaining reasonable SSL performances. Importantly, we propose a simple extension of the Hidden Manifold Model that naturally incorporates data-augmentation schemes and offers a framework for understanding and experimenting with SSL methods.
The problem of developing binary classifiers from positive and unlabeled data is often encountered in machine learning. A common requirement in this setting is to approximate posterior probabilities of positive and negative classes for a previously unseen data point. This problem can be decomposed into two steps: (i) the development of accurate predictors that discriminate between positive and unlabeled data, and (ii) the accurate estimation of the prior probabilities of positive and negative examples. In this work we primarily focus on the latter subproblem. We study nonparametric class prior estimation and formulate this problem as an estimation of mixing proportions in two-component mixture models, given a sample from one of the components and another sample from the mixture itself. We show that estimation of mixing proportions is generally ill-defined and propose a canonical form to obtain identifiability while maintaining the flexibility to model any distribution. We use insights from this theory to elucidate the optimization surface of the class priors and propose an algorithm for estimating them. To address the problems of high-dimensional density estimation, we provide practical transformations to low-dimensional spaces that preserve class priors. Finally, we demonstrate the efficacy of our method on univariate and multivariate data.
We currently lack a solid statistical understanding of semi-supervised learning methods, instead treating them as a collection of highly effective tricks. This precludes the principled combination e.g. of Bayesian methods and semi-supervised learning, as semi-supervised learning objectives are not currently formulated as likelihoods for an underlying generative model of the data. Here, we note that standard image benchmark datasets such as CIFAR-10 are carefully curated, and we provide a generative model describing the curation process. Under this generative model, several state-of-the-art semi-supervised learning techniques, including entropy minimization, pseudo-labelling and the FixMatch family emerge naturally as variational lower-bounds on the log-likelihood.
In this paper, we consider a general stochastic optimization problem which is often at the core of supervised learning, such as deep learning and linear classification. We consider a standard stochastic gradient descent (SGD) method with a fixed, large step size and propose a novel assumption on the objective function, under which this method has the improved convergence rates (to a neighborhood of the optimal solutions). We then empirically demonstrate that these assumptions hold for logistic regression and standard deep neural networks on classical data sets. Thus our analysis helps to explain when efficient behavior can be expected from the SGD method in training classification models and deep neural networks.
We exploit a recently derived inversion scheme for arbitrary deep neural networks to develop a new semi-supervised learning framework that applies to a wide range of systems and problems. The approach outperforms current state-of-the-art methods on MNIST reaching $99.14%$ of test set accuracy while using $5$ labeled examples per class. Experiments with one-dimensional signals highlight the generality of the method. Importantly, our approach is simple, efficient, and requires no change in the deep network architecture.
suggested questions
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
